Silicone Nozzles User Report

, I have about a 34fr and a larger, homemade 5/8" diameter closed/rounded end tube that the same force only gets in to the middle of the sigmoid (I guess that's expected because it's stiffer).

Moliere, I wouldn't give up yet. From reading your previous post with the quote above, I see that the tubes you are using could be your main problem.

Using the right tube made all the difference for me. I tried a few long tubes from various sources with zero success. Then I read in Zity about Silicone Nozzles. I first tried a 28-inch, 63 Fr, tube in mildly firm silicone from Silicon Nozzles. I was able to insert it up to the top of my descending colon the first time. This eventually led me to order the same tube Enema Runner has, a long (66-inch in my case), 75 Fr tube in semi-soft silicone. I had doubts, but it was a thrill to get it fully inserted on my first session.

I recommend you try the shortest (18") 75 Fr tube from Silicone Nozzles in semi-soft silicone for $70.

http://siliconenozzles.com/CT-75French-1-Diameter-Silicone-Serpentine-Colon-Tube-CT-75Fr.htm

If you are able to insert that tube easily, then you might want to make a bigger investment in a longer tube.

Yep, yep and yep. I'm pretty sure that my rectosigmoid also is uncooperative often, but "tortuous colon" did definitely come as a side note from an exam. Now the exam wasn't for that, but I'm really not interested enough to push for a second opinion and barium enema, colonoscopy, or whatever they would use to confirm it. I'll just accept it as very probable - at any rate the colon seems to go all over the place in the pictures, and it would explain some of why I've had ongoing bowel issues. The times I have gotten a tube up into the sigmoid it catches multiple times and isn't what I would describe as pleasurable. Combining that with the added risk of perforation and I think I'll just sit colon tubes out.

I'm not sure what a Model S is.

A nice midsized nozzle from Siliconenozzles. One and a quarter inches diameter, sort of what seems to be described as a "bat" style. I probably could have gone to the smaller model "M", but wasn't sure how easily it would go in, and the Model S isn't bad. Stays in place, comfortable, and only needs a bit of warm up to insert.

Personal experience with resistance:

Sometimes the navigation of a tube through the sigmoid itself can be a real challenge. For me, the smaller diameter tubes have much more difficulty working their way through and I'm more worried about the concentrated pressure that smaller diameter tubes can place on the colon walls (more force per square inch or square centimeter). It is much easier to insert the smaller tubes with a good deal of enema solution already infused than without.

My larger diameter tubes can and do occasionally present a bit of resistance somewhere between six and eight inches after insertion. Inserting at an angle (in my case towards the center of my lower back) often gets around that sphincter like structure or closure that seems to occur. Anatomically, I think that these are the transverse folds or valves of Houston that can extend well into the rectum. That is the place where there seems to be a good deal of resistance and then the tube suddenly slips by. That moment of relaxation of whatever muscle structure is involved is quite pleasurable for me. However, I have experienced times when it is quite difficult to get beyond this point.

Beyond that the two larger tube diameters I own (75fr and 122fr, 1.0 and 1.6 inches diameter, respectively) slide on by quite smoothly. The larger diameter will trigger peristaltic contractions and by allowing them to pass, the tube slides easily once the muscle contraction relaxes.

As I have written elsewhere, I can navigate the tubes up the descending colon. Most of the tubes can make the turn at the splenic flexure to allow the enema solution to flow directly into the transverse colon.

I have a bit of a Silicone Nozzles shopping dilemma. I am interested in a thick and relatively firm tube for enema use and depth play. Having really enjoyed my CT-75 in 10 soft for enemas and internal colon massage, I decided that I wanted something wider to provide more oomph. My CT-122 (1.6" diameter) in 05 soft is actually too soft for the type of massage-style stimulation I want, plus it's lacking ribs. It's still fun under the right conditions since its width helps hold the solution deeper. I started to look at the 2.5" and 3" diameter colon tubes here, which are offered with a ribbed tapered start. Further shopping on the site has convinced me that I'd enjoy the Rattler (http://siliconenozzles.com/The-Rattler-32-Silicone-Retention-Enema-Colon-Nozzle-RATLR-32.htm) or MaxiBall (http://siliconenozzles.com/MAXIBALL30-Silicone-Retention-Ball-Enema-Colon-Nozzle-MAXIBALL30.htm) more. They are similar length and diameter so the decision is tough. I'm wondering if anyone has experience with them to help me make the decision. I'm thinking 12 semi-soft, 15 lightly soft or 18 mildly firm, given my desire for an internal massage experience. I can imagine that either of these pieces would feel amazing as the bumps pop through my outer ring, inner ring, sigmoid opening, and splenic flexure. That type of stimulation makes me ooze, then cum a ton. I'm leaning towards the Rattler since it would offer some more varied sensations.

@permitdrab I have a Rattler. I picked it up a few weeks ago from SN's ready to ship selection, having also considered both the Miniball and Maxiball. I forget exactly what softness specification it is, but in my limited experience with it to date I will say that so far I've not been able to get it all the way in. The combination of width and softness conspire to make transition through the splenic flexure a challenge I've not yet determined a solution for. Once the tip encounters the turn, the experience becomes like pushing on a string with the softness allowing the tube to double back on itself.

Not having the Maxiball I cannot compare it to the Rattler, but my reason for choosing the Rattler in the first place was the variety of the design.

@permitdrab I have a Rattler. I picked it up a few weeks ago from SN's ready to ship selection, having also considered both the Miniball and Maxiball. I forget exactly what softness specification it is, but in my limited experience with it to date I will say that so far I've not been able to get it all the way in.

How great to wake up today and already have a reply. I noticed that Bob still has out of stock ready to ship items listed. Is this by chance what you bought: http://siliconenozzles.com/The-Rattler-32-Retention-Enema-Colon-Nozzle-BROWN-OPEN-RTS-RATTLER-BROWN-OPEN-RTS.htm? My experience with the CT-122 in 05 plus soft is similar to yours with the Rattler. I know I must go former than that in order to more easily round bends, but also in order to feel the texture of the Rattler firmly massage the walls of my colon. I'm leaning towards 12 semi-soft because I'm concerned that 18 mildly firm could cause its own issues with turns due to the Rattler's thickness. However, with the spacing between the max diameter expansions, this may be a false concern. The tight spacing of the expansion balls on the MaxiBall make me unsure of the handling of the sigmoid and splenic flexure bends. I'm sure large volume fills to stretch and straighten the colon first would help, but I ambitiously want to use my new purchase for initial fills. I also don't own anything in 18 mildy firm from SN, in order to compare. I go from 12 semi-soft to 30 firm.

?.. Is this by chance what you bought: http://siliconenozzles.com/The-Rattler-32-Retention-Enema-Colon-Nozzle-BROWN-OPEN-RTS-RATTLER-BROWN-OPEN-RTS.htm?...

No, sir. Mine is the resplendent orange one they had listed prior to the brown one.

It seems like the thinner the tube, the stiffer it has to be to keep from doubling over which is why SN limits length to 36 inches. My smallest diameter tube from SN is a CT75fr. The #12 softness can (rarely) fold back on itself. The #18 firm is not so likely.

If you're concerned, SN makes the recommendation that you move up one size.

The CT-54 is one of my favorite tubes. I like it better than my CT-63 or CT-75 It's a very comfortable tube.

professor

Well, I pulled the trigger on the Rattler, figuring the future Maxiball decision can be made once I have a better idea of the softness performance of the Rattler. I decided on a fluorescent green (why not, LOL) Rattler in 12 semi soft, with a 7/32" bore. Based on one of the thickest parts of the tube being the bumps right at the beginning, I didn't want the flexibility into the splenic flexure to be limited by the silicone being too firm. I also figured that the slightly narrower bore, will add a slightly firmer feel to that softness.

While I was browsing, I came across some extra goodies that I could resist.

The multiple series of bumps on this "ready to ship" one looked very arousing as I could imagine them popping their way through my sigmoid: http://siliconenozzles.com/Multi-Ribbed-1375-FLESH-OPEN-RTS-MultiRib-12-FLESH-OPEN-RTS.htm (custom version here: http://www.siliconenozzles.com/Multi-Ribbed-15-Long-Unique-Ball-Ribs-Silicone-Colon-Nozzle-MLTIRIB15.htm)

Then I saw the longer version, which unfortunately has slightly narrower bumps and ribs, except for the entry point: http://siliconenozzles.com/Multi-Ribbed-32-Long-Unique-Barrel-Rib-Silicone-Colon-Nozzle-MLTIRIB32.htm. Reading the description of it as a massage piece, as well as a colon tube, really reeled me in. The prospect of feeling each of those textures move through my anal rings, sigmoid ring and most hopefully my splenic flexure was so appealing that I leaked precum as I contemplated experiencing it. I ordered it in fluorescent orange (again, why not) in 18 mildly firm with a 7/32" bore. The 18 mildly firm is actually the softest option available, which is likely a positive since I didn't have to waffle between that and a lower softness. I want to ensure that the various textures are as pronounced as possible as I sink the 30+ inches into my craving colon.

Needless to say, I'll have several new SN items to provide Zity members feedback on. I hadn't taken a close look at Bob's vastly expanded options for quite some time, but I'm glad to see that other considerations of enemas and colon play are factoring into the designs, most specifically the massage of the colon walls by the nozzle/tube used, in addition to the enema fill itself. Has anyone else had experience with Bob's various ribbed, bumped, spiraled (curious about that, especially if longer), etc. offerings, that they can share?

Happy fills...I'm so horny with anticipation that I'm going to go fill up with my trusty CT-75 and lately neglected Model T!

@permitdrab

I look forward to your report(s). I had thought about the Maxiball30. But it would just turn the corner at the splenic flexure though it would have a variable diameter that is larger than the 122fr that I have that turns that corner.

I'm think about moving up in diameter and the SNCMAX3 seems interesting even though it is much shorter than I'm accustomed to using. Definitely would seal the lower colon, though.

Also giving some thought to the 228fr. A massive nozzle, to be sure.

For previous questions about which softness/firmness options for Silicone Nozzles’ colon tubes are best, here is what’s offered and my experience with the five tubes I’ve purchased.

Softness/Firmness Options

CT-54: 12 Semi-soft; 18 Mildly Firm; 30 Firm

CT-63 & CT-75: 12 Semi-soft; 18 Mildly Firm

CT-86: 10 Soft; 12 Semi-soft; 18 Mildly Firm (discontinued)

CT-103: 00-50 Plus Soft; 10 Soft; 12 Semi-soft; 18 Mildly Firm

CT-122 & CT-152: 00-20 Extra Soft; 00-50 Plus Soft; 10 Soft; 12 Semi-soft

My Experience

CT-63 28” 18 Mildly Firm: Works well, full insertion every time

CT-75, 66”, 12 Semi-soft: Perfect, love it, full insertion most sessions

CT-86, 60”, 18 Mildly Firm: Too firm or wide to pass through my splenic flexure

CT-122, 60”, 00-50 Plus Soft: Too soft to insert > 24” easily, but great feeling for short insertions

CT-152, 60”, 00-20 Extra Soft: Too soft to insert > 24” at all, but great feeling for short insertions

You need to go firmer for smaller diameter, and softer for larger diameter. As tube diameter goes up, so does the softness of the materials offered. I believe tubes in the middle softness/firmness material(s) offered for each diameter have roughly equal degrees of flexibility.

Be careful with the softest and the firmest options for the tubes that have three or more options. For tubes with only two softness/firmness options, either one is probably OK,

For longer tubes (> 30”), I recommend sticking to the middle of the softness/firmness levels offered for whatever diameter tube you want. Too soft a material makes insertion difficult and fold-overs and double-backs more likely. Too firm a material makes insertion impossible because of insufficient flexibility to round sharp turns, especially the splenic flexure and the first sigmoid turn.

@WildBill2 having the CT-122 in the same softness as you, my experience has been the same.

There is something tempting about the tapered redesign in a 10 or 12 softness: http://siliconenozzles.com/CT80-122French-34-Silicone-Tapered-Rib-Serpentine-Colon-Tube-CT80-122-TPRDRIB.htm. I'll have a better idea of which softness may work best for me once I can test the Rattler.

@permidrab, I took note of this one too a short time ago. I'm very tempted by the taper and the ribs. I'd probably go with '10 Soft' I think if I ordered it. '12 Semi-soft' would be fine for the first few inches in the 80 Fr diameter, but probably too firm for the 122 Fr tail end to go easily through the tight turns of the sigmoid colon, but maybe not.

@permidrab, if you want to get the ribbing effect for less money, you might want to try this reversible tube modification that Susie suggested to me in a PM. It worked for her husband.

SwichableSussie wrote, "What my husband did was to take #10 rubber bands and place them around the 1" OD hose every 2 inches. Then he got a heavy gauge shrink tubing 1 1/4 - 1 1/2 inches in diameter and slid the hose with the rubber band through it. Then he took a heat gun and shrunk the heat shrink tubing around it. That made a bumpy textured tube you could really appreciate when your stroked it in and out. The end of the tube was sealed with GE silicone to make a sealed, smooth, round domed end."

Sounds like he used this technique for a homemade tube, but it should work on a Silicone Nozzles tube. Apparently the GE silicone sticks to heavy gauge shrink tubing. I'm thinking about trying this to make my CT 122 in '00-50 Plus Soft' a little stiffer with ribbed texture. I would guess the heat shrink tubing compresses '00-50 Plus Soft' silicone to make it stiffer and slightly smaller in diameter. Google "shrink wrap", and you'll see the stuff is cheap, including the heat gun needed. I'd go with polyethylene, and avoid PVC.

@permitdrab

Also giving some thought to the 228fr. A massive nozzle, to be sure.

Me too! I would get it in 00-20 Extra Soft.

I've got a retention plug of the same diameter in 00-20 Extra Soft:

http://siliconenozzles.com/SPD30-3-Inch-Diameter-Super-Retention-Silicone-Nozzle-SPD30.htm

This plug, which is a cheap preview of the 228fr, feels amazing inside me. I have to be extremely relaxed to handle a rigid 3" plug, but this one is the exact opposite of rigid and goes in easily and painlessly through my anus like a 2.5 or even smaller plug because the Extra Soft material actually compresses into a smaller diameter on its way in. Then it pops out inside my rectum to absolutely seal it by molding to the exact shape of my rectum. The seal is perfect. The outward pressure of it trying to expand back to full size is very pleasurable. It looks painful to pull out, but I don't think Extra Soft silicone can cause pain. Getting it out requires external pulling and internal pushing, but it's much easier to take out than it looks when you want it out. Yet I've never had it pop out on its own, even when running, stair climbing, and doing squats at the gym.

My CT-152 in Extra Soft goes past my sigmoid and bogs down in my descending. I think the hyper-flexibility is the issue. A CT-228 fr in Extra Soft would be stiffer because of the greater diameter, and might actually go in deeper for me than my CT-152. The two reviews on Silicon Nozzels say that is what happens. I may yet try a 228.

@WildBill2

Sometimes getting the CT122fr tube inserted beyond the rectum can be a challenge because of the tube's combined softness and length. At the 00-50 "soft" density, once these tubes get into the sigmoid, they tend to navigate my descending colon fairly easily. The trick for me is making the turn at the splenic flexure into the transverse colon. I sometimes think that the softness (compression) of the tube can be a bit of a hindrance because translating the forward pressure around the corner seems to be the challenge. I can feel the tube nosing its way into and through the transverse colon but I think it would be "easier" if I was about one level or two less soft.

On the CT75, the #12 and #18 softness levels work just fine. The smaller diameter tube makes it easier to make those turns and the more stiff tube translate the forward motion more easily.

I'm think about moving up in diameter and the SNCMAX3 seems interesting...Definitely would seal the lower colon, though.

@Enema_Runner Whoa! Thanks for the heads up about the SNCMAX3 (http://siliconenozzles.com/SNCMAX3-3-Inch-Diameter-Maxi-Silicone-Retention-Nozzle-SNCMAX3.htm). The experience Bob describes in the description sound great to me. A nozzle to to stretch and hold the sigmoid sphincter open, fill from the bottom up and prevent backflow into the rectum...excellent. Somehow I'd missed that one because it looked small, but it surely isn't. Wide and long, making it most likely my next purchase.

@Enema_Runner I can relate to the depth limitations you've mentioned with the CT-122 original design

@WildBill2 I also have previously read Susie's post about adding a ribbed texture and I agree it is very tempting. If I feel like I want to experience more firm sensations using a notably wide tube, I'll definitely try it with my CT-122. My Rattler purchase will ideally serve my ribbed massage needs, since I appreciate being able to use the CT-122 for fills starting beyond the sigmoid as it is. Unfortunately, overall lack of feedback made the specification selection quite a gamble.

However, I do find it personally unfortunate that the CT-122 model on the market today was likely a result of early adopter feedback rather than pre-market testing (I urge anyone to read this through before thinking I'm overly critical). It's clear from descriptions of newer products that there is now more pre-market testing, which is excellent and has resulted in improved buying experiences for me. Tip A on the CT-122 is actually the second tip developed for it, which sucked for me as an early CT-122 purchaser (only tip then was the now identified as Tip B) who have experienced what others did with too early compression.

What I am getting at is the idea that that feedback from others (not only on Zity but also SN, which has too few and detail lacking reviews, for some items) will be valuable for us all in order to help not only make our selections, but guide the future awesome pleasure offerings of SN! I need to revisit my orders to ensure I've reviewed where I can because it is clear that with a growing audience, SN is way more than a niche.

Well, I just had a detailed review that was "eaten" when I was unable to edit it, so I tried to copy and paste it, which failed... 😢

I'm too tired and frustrated now, but sometime soon I'll hopefully be able to provide a review of the items I ordered earlier this week.

Hi all ! I am new to this site and recently discovered SN. I have on order the type F 16" nozzle for my coffee enemas. I'm hoping that the new nozzle will be the cure for the large amount of resistance to flow that I have been experiencing. How long does it take from time of ordering to delivery at doorstep ?

Hi all ! I am new to this site and recently discovered SN. I have on order the type F 16" nozzle for my coffee enemas. I'm hoping that the new nozzle will be the cure for the large amount of resistance to flow that I have been experiencing. How long does it take from time of ordering to delivery at doorstep ?

Typically 7-10 days has been my experience. Depends upon how busy they are. Selection is sent Priority Mail and is trackable. It seems the longest time is from label print to pickup once you get your notice that it is being shipped.

Typically 7-10 days has been my experience. Depends upon how busy they are. Selection is sent Priority Mail and is trackable. It seems the longest time is from label print to pickup once you get your notice that it is being shipped.

Yes, that's my experience too. But it also depends if they have it in stock and it ships the next day. If they don't have it in stock, then it goes to the production schedule which may take a little longer. I've ordered four items from them, all out-of-stock, and 7-10 days is about right.

Sometimes getting the CT122fr tube inserted beyond the rectum can be a challenge because of the tube's combined softness and length. At the 00-50 "soft" density...

On the CT75, the #12 and #18 softness levels work just fine. The smaller diameter tube makes it easier to make those turns and the more stiff tube translate the forward motion more easily.

@permitdrab, I've had exactly the same experience with the CT122 in 00-50. Great for 24" to 30", but not beyond that for me.

I just looked back at my CT75 order and see that it's in #10 material. It's a little too soft, and some days does not easily get into my sigmoid cleanly (tip first.) Once it does, it's clear sailing for me for the whole 66" to the end of the line. It seldom hangs in my splenic flexure.

SN doesn't offer the CT75 in #10 anymore. I wish it hadn't been offered when I ordered it so that I would have ordered #12 softness.

@permitdrab and @Enema_Runner, I just took a look at the SNCMAX3, and I'm about to order one. Did you guys or anyone else get one yet? Unless I hear soon that it's a bad idea, I'm going to get it in #00-20 Extra Soft, since my SPD3.0 in that material is so amazing.

Welcome @bumbershot ! SN is about a week for me too on numerous orders--two weeks at the longest. How's your new nozzle work for you?

I purchased the SNCMAX3 when it first appeared in a soft durometer. I have tried to take the entire thing every few months, but so far have only taken the first two ridges. The widest has yet to make it in, despite repeated efforts. I have not given up, but respect the challenge it poses.

@permitdrab and @Enema_Runner, I just took a look at the SNCMAX3, and I'm about to order one. Did you guys or anyone else get one yet? Unless I hear soon that it's a bad idea, I'm going to get it in #00-20 Extra Soft, since my SPD3.0 in that material is so amazing.

I haven't ordered one yet. I plan to at the end of the month. I'm going for the #12 softness, but I like things a bit firmer.

@permitdrab and @Enema_Runner, I just took a look at the SNCMAX3, and I'm about to order one. Did you guys or anyone else get one yet?

Not yet, but your question just gave me a reminder. That is something I should try to get in my hands...and elsewhere soon. Given that I want to feel its substantial presence in my rectum and penetrating my sigmoid opening, I'm thinking I'll go for either 10 or 12 softness.

The new Colonballer (http://siliconenozzles.com/26-Large-Sensory-Ball-2-25-Diameter-150-190-Fr-Enema-Nozzle-COLONBALLER.htm) looks like it would be fun based on the pleasure I've obtained with the Rattler. However, I'm not sure I could thoroughly enjoy it yet since I can only take the Rattler about halfway (past the 3rd ridge). That's enough to hit the right spots, but I would like to sink it all the way sometime. As I work on the Rattler more, I need to use that experience in order to select a proper softness if I were to order the Colonballer. Also hoping to see some reviews show up.

The COLONBALLER looks like fun! It comes in every softness/firmness, so which one? Good question. I think whatever softness works best for a CT-152 would also work best for the COLONBALLER. The CT-152 now only comes in 00-50, 10, and 12, so I would narrow it down to these 3. Just guessing, but I'd go with 10 if I had to pick one.

@permadrab, this is another example of SN offering too many options for a product, without reviews, option recommendations, or SN test results listed for each product and option. I'll bet the extreme softness and firmness levels for the COLONBALLER work for few if any people. By the way, I had the same experience you did ordering Tip B for a colon tube. Tip A is much better!

Thanks for the softness/firmness advice from all of you on the SNCMAX3. I'm undecided still.

I think I would want 10 or 12 softness for short term use of the SNCMAX3--for enemas, masturbation, or enhancement of sex with my wife.

For long term use, I'm still thinking 00-20 or 00-50 because my SPD3.0 in 00-20 is so amazingly comfortable that I could, if i wanted to do so, stay plugged with it continuously and only remove it during enema expulsions every 2nd or 3rd day.

Maybe I'll get two.

Placed my order for the SNCMAX3. Chose the #12 softness.

Do you guys know about @Buttwoman? She is into big, deep anal insertions, way more that I am. Her blogs are amazing. She only cums anally, and that happens for her in a myriad of ways. Check her out and tell her I sent you.

She just turned me on to an amazing Doc Johnson product, The Belladonna Magic Hand: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001IV5I5W/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s01?ie=UTF8&th=1

She just started inserting it completely inside herself, all 11.5 inches with the 2.75" knuckles well into her sigmoid. It's her favorite toy now. I bought one, and it's a lot of fun. I told @Buttwoman that all I had to do was give it little push and I'd swallow it up too, but I thought that was too dangerous. So the next day I did it! Stupid maybe, but totally awesome! It turned out not to be dangerous for me. I was able to squeeze it right out.

So Bob, if your listening, make one of these with a 1/4" bore, and just add on the end of the forearm a fast taper to a 1.5" long valley of about 1.5" diameter, and put a flange on the end. I'll buy one in mildly firm, and it might be a hit for SN.

I also very much like the new product suggestion on the SN site by a reviewer of the SNCMAX3--to and a few inches on the end to go farther up the colon, say a lengthening to a 15" insertable length.

Placed my order for the SNCMAX3. Chose the #12 softness.

It arrived this afternoon. OMG, it's big. The "stretch" working the tip up through the rectum towards the sigmoid is pretty impressive, definitely on the order of my 122 fr tube when I get both retention balls in. Couldn't insert it all the way the first time and really didn't have the time to work with it much. I did not have a hose attached (so I could try to sit on it and have it slip in). Butt, definitely not something to be rushed.

More later.