G-spot - does it really exist?
All my gf's say no.
Well, I tend to share your gf's views on this but it is I recognise a subject which has differing opinions about it. Probably 50% for the g-spot and 50% dissenting.
Now, I hold a halfway view I guess and to support my theories I've copy pasted a posting I made some time ago.
It reads as follows:- I do not believe that the G-spot exists as a body of tissue having nerves which when stimulated give pleasure, any more than the rest of the vaginal canal.
However, the described location where this fabled spot is said to exist is useful in pinpointing the place where the female urethra is closest to the front wall of the vagina and therefore the most appropriate place to stimulate the urethra without doing so with such instruments as urethral sounds or catheters.
The urethra is lined with glands such as the Skene's and the paraurethral glands which, when stimulated by a flow of urine release an alkaline fluid to counter the acidic content of urine, thereby protecting the urethral tissue.
Stimulating the area concerned, usually by rapid 'tapping' of the area with the pads of two fingers, or a vibrator, mimics the release of urine and can produce the fluid flow which is often described as female ejaculate.
In urination the paraurethral fluid is of course mixed with the urine and is usually indistinguishable, save when it is profuse and the urine may then have some cloudiness. In stimulation of the area, without urination, the fluid is entirely different from urine in consistency, colour, taste etc.
The presence of the fluid in urine can fool the 'dipstick' method of urinalysis which is why a mid-stream (or 'clean') specimen of urine is needed for analysis and a patient is asked to urinate into the toilet - stop - urinate into the specimen container -stop - and finish into the toilet. The initial flow will have minimised the amount of paraurethral fluid in the sample.
The area of the vaginal canal where the G-spot is supposedly located is often described as being 'ribbed' or of a different consistency but the absence or presence of such a difference is no guide as to the existence or otherwise of the G-spot.
It's my submission, (and there will be opposing views) that the supposed G-spot is merely an area which, when contacted, transmits the stimulation to the urethra with resultant pleasure, rather than a pleasure producing zone in it's own right.
I've no real objection to the opposing views since the object and outcome of stimulating the area concerned is the most important, rather than the physiology involved. But please readers, don't 'flame' me - just contribute your own account. Copy/paste ends.
So nappy, your gf's haven't had their's found. Thats not to say the g-spot doesn't exist, no more than those who have found the elusive place mean that it does exist. It's fabled location just happens to be where stimulation most results in pleasure of a kind that many never experience.
Neither does it mean either you or their other lovers, if any, are inept - just that it hasn't happened.