Do you feel "more naked" as a circumcised man?

In polite walking around naked society, I've always felt that a foreskin covered glans is less sexual than a penis with a denuded glans since the glans is the primary organ for sexual feelings. For those uncut, arousal usually exposes the glans indicating a significant difference between the aroused and unaroused states. For those that are cut, you really don't have a reference point. You're glans is exposed no matter what.

How would I know? I have been circumcised since shortly after birth.

I think my penis is OK circumcised!!!! Its fully functional, and never disapointed me.

In polite walking around naked society, I've always felt that a foreskin covered glans is less sexual than a penis with a denuded glans since the glans is the primary organ for sexual feelings.

This is one of the reasons I have been intrigued by the practice of circumcision ever since I learned exactly what was removed from an intact penis.

The glans is part of what makes a penis attractive, to me--and I agree culture and individual aesthetics have a lot to do with this and i would make no sweeping claims for others--so having it beneath skin is less appealing, to me. And with those who say they have a "mushroom head," we'd have to take their word for it if they are not circumcised.

Plus most of us don't get a say. C happens very often in very early childhood.

No. I more than long hair hiding my neck or short hair exposing it. It’s how my body is. Naked is a question of what can be removed that is not part of the body. Retracting the foreskin is an act not a state and has the erotic potential of any act.

I am uncut, anyway many of my play exams involve accurate penis examination and my play doc loves to discuss about my prepuce, frenulum and the need for a circumcision. This make me arouse a lot and she knows. One of the preferred part is the retraction and the feeling of my glans uncovered. Surely I feel extremely exposed during the procedure. During a session we discussed on the topic and she wanted to make me feel how is a penis after a circumcision. She sutured my proximal prepuce tight so the glans remains completely exposed. It was a special feeling, expecially during further examinations and my penis getting soft but remaining very sensitive. Definitely I feel more naked. The impossibility to reduce the prepuce covering the glans and having the glans exposed in both states erect and flaccid make me arouse a lot expecially during the exam. My doctor had to change completely the kind of stimulations because retraction was impossible and she started to massage directly the glans. I felt very vulnerable, exposed and naked but I think real cut men accustomed relatively fastly to the new feelings after the surgery.

....I felt very vulnerable, exposed and naked but I think real cut men accustomed relatively fastly to the new feelings after the surgery.

Hi, I was circumcised past october.

The truth is that I thought It would be ..... more.

More sensations, more special.. .. but I haven't found so much difference.

A couple of weeks ago we went to the beach, first time naked in public since circumcision. But didn't feel the expected difference.

Yes, wife is more interested in oral... but sensations are +/- the same than before. Maybe she could go rougher because no more short frenulum, but otherwise I don't feel so much difference. Mine is a loose one, may be the ones cut tight feel more differences.

Before circ, wife complained foreskin unretracting when doggy style (one of my favourite positions), now without foreskin I thought we'll do more , but she orgasms so much when I give her oral that then she says is tired and prefer traditional positions....

Yesterday I tricked her to try something new.

I agree with doing 69 -that I don'l like so much, because I prefer feeling tongue in the glans underside rather in the top-, but after 15minutes, when end was approaching, I've asked her to perform a lubed handjob, keeping shaft skin as much retracted as possible, so simulating a thight circumcision. Something I've asked for since my circumcision with no avail,

And finally I got it !!

When I was orgasming she changed to blowjob (she's obssessed with oral), so I couldn't try the post orgasm handjob torture as asked her many times.

But I think I'm found the way to convince her to tie me to the bed and perform the post orgasm torture handjob.

I feel really "naked", vulnerable and exposed when she strokes my bare glans, because that's not supposed to be the "normal" way. I feel slaved and violated in my more intimal part.

Definitly, I don't get the same sensation if I masturbate my self, It has to be done by a 3rd one.

Being Circumcised, I suppose I am 'more' naked (when unclothed) than many of my British counterparts would feel. Circumcision is not very common here in Europe these days, I don't know why as I think it looks better and is more hygienic. I have also heard that there are Medical benefits to being Circumcised too.

I once heard of a "Master" telling his "Slave" that he was going to get him Circumcised so there would be no part of his body covered up when he was naked. I don't know whether he would have gone as far as getting the Slave's Testicles taken out of his Scrotum and exposed for the same reason....! Maybe that would be a step too far.

Being circumcised, my glans was never a private part of my body, it was always public when I was naked. I had more concerns with the size of my penis.

Well I've always been circumcised so I guess I wouldn't no any difference, so no.

I'm kind of surprised how dismissive people in this thread have been about this topic. Sure, whether you are naked is more or less an objective fact that seems like it doesn't have much gray area or room for interpretation. However, there is some room for differences between the objective fact of being naked and the subjective experience of how strongly or acutely one FEELS their nakedness. For example, are you naked if you are wearing only socks? Maybe not technically, but most of us would certainly FEEL naked in that situation. Similarly, many of us would feel our nakedness more strongly if we were the only naked person in the room, as opposed to a situation where others are naked too.

For many of us, a big part of medfet play includes toying with these feelings of nakedness and exposure. I have a friend and medfet play partner who is uncircumcised and grew up in a country where circumcision is not common. We've discussed that for him the retraction of his foreskin is the moment when he feels the most exposed, even moreso than when his anus is examined. He also seems to think it's interesting that because I'm circumcised my glans is exposed from the moment my underwear come off. But of course this is all I've ever known and I have never personally felt "more naked" than, for example, an uncircumcised man that I might happen to see in the gym showers.

Technically is an circumcised man any more naked than an uncircumcised man whose glans is covered by his foreskin? No, of course not. And as I think we've established in this thread, most men who have been circumcised their whole lives don't feel this way and usually haven't thought much about it. But it also seems entirely reasonable that an uncircumcised man who is not used to having his glans exposed might FEEL "more naked" when it is exposed, and might also feel this way for a while if he were to be circumcised.

Bottom line is that it's pretty hard to argue against how someone else feels, and it's also not really fair to dismiss these feelings!

No, I don't feel naked. I am happy with the way he looks and feels especially since I've never known anything different. My father is uncut and he was worried about the health issues that can go with that and that's why he had he sons get cut. I think it definitely looks cleaner and I wouldn't every change it. I feel naked when I'm naked, that tiny bit of skin wouldn't change that in any way.

I once compared wee wees with a circumcised cousin and I was under the impression that he felt "exposed". But maybe this is not so much circumcision per se as having had to show the result of surgery to my mom (she was curious) and perhaps other relatives.

having had to show the result of surgery to my mom (she was curious) and perhaps other relatives.

Ya hafta love how the family makes a young boy feel his privates aren't as private as a girls privates. His are always available for viewing whenever they want, even for all the girls in the vicinity who want to see. While it's no boys allowed if a girl is going to be exposed.

I absolutely agree with lonewolf9mm. My situation exactly!

- Ken

Roscoe: To be fair, I don't think mom or auntie would have acted any different with respect to a female child having a problem down there.They thought apparently that children, being taken care of by old female relatives, had no business hiding their private parts from them.

Furthermore my mother did something pretty bad for my sister's privacy when she was a teenager. So no I don't think she was sexist on this point.

However, what's true is that if my mother went to pee in the woods, it was almost like a state security affair. She was obsessed by the idea that some passer-by would see her squatting, or that the males in the family would like to see her doing her business. So we had to stand perimeter guard facing away from her. Needless to say, males were not awarded such precautions; I was just supposed to face away or get behind a tree.

Nope. My little guy was circumcised as far back as I can recall. I'm unsure if dad was, (my guess would be probably) but it's too late to ask him now because he no longer breaths on this planet. Asking mom who's still alive is absolutely out of the question. However, I'm quite pleased with how my penis looks, so whomever did the circumcision obviously didn't perform a hack job. It's never gotten an aesthetic complaint or received a weird look from any female partner. Naked to me simply means not wearing a single garment to cover any part of oneself.

Never thought about it until I saw this post. Not at all. Makes hygiene in that region much easier. I don’t miss what I didn’t remember having.

Not circumcised, but I have a weird thing where I don't feel truly naked unless my foreskin is pulled back, revealing the glans.

I am not (yet) circumcised but I would feel more naked I think.

As DrZ said

a perfectly reasonable question when not seen through an American filter. It will often be difficult for men who have always been circumcised to appreciate

He's right ... to an American it would be a nonsense question because circumcisions are the norm there, but to someone in the school showers in the UK, seeing a penis without its foreskin was a novelty worthy of much group gossip and taunting. Being from the UK and circumcised myself, I see the perspective of this question because I certainly felt far more exposed than everyone else. It was a source of great humiliation back in my UK school days, noting that was before the internet was available to display any circumcised cocks to my classmates. After all, the only time any boy would ever see a fully exposed cockhead back then was his own when wanking in the privacy of his bedroom. Even in later life a straight guy would likely never see the glans of any of his mate's cocks (short of having group sex with them).

I was the only boy in my school year with a circumcised penis and all school sports had mandatory communal showers. I was one of the oldest in my year and my puberty brought a growth spurt ahead of most, so I was very prominent in having pubes ahead of others & an adult size cock, plus I have a mushroom-shaped bell-end with flared glans. Some thought it must be a form of erection & thought perhaps I was gay.

I was teased to the point of being stripped naked in the school grounds with my clothes thrown into tall, dense stinging nettles. Having no choice I had to wade in to recover them, inevitably getting multiple stings all over my legs & genitals. To add irony, I copped nettle stings to the exposed head of my penis. Throughout the afternoon, it swelled up, red, menacing, stinging & itchy. Then I'd have to sit red-faced in class, as well as having to explain to teachers & then parents why I'd lost a sock and a shoe.

The taunting calmed down after US porn mags started circulating round the school. These showed exclusively circumcised cocks that were sported by enviable male models with hot nude girls drooling over them. And because of censorship in those mags, erections (& penetrations) weren't allowed, so you'd see a hot blonde kneeling in front of a big cocked guy with his soft circumcised cock dangling in front of her mouth but no boners and no sucking.

When I moved to Australia as an adult, it was less unusual to be circumcised, to the point nobody batted an eyelid and I could feel happy to shower naked. In fact as time's gone by I've come to enjoy being nude in front of others and I enjoy the extra exposure of being circumcised. I also think the exhibitionism that I now feel is so much more heightened by having liberated myself from my schoolboy humiliations.

I am a bi nudist, and at the beach or in nude male company I will wear my foreskin forward, or partly or fully retracted depending on how I feel.

I know some cut guys like to see uncut guys in different states, and I enjoy showing them. I am usually fully shaved and I feel that is a more open look than having a big bush obscuring one's genitals.

If I am with a small group of nude guys we all see each other's penises and quite often there is open chat. I guess like female's open labia, a partly rolled back foreskin seems to create interest in some guys.

In the locker room I will often leave the shower fully retracted after washing, and cut guys often seem interested to have a look, which I am absolutely fine about.

All this may go back to my childhood when it was impressed on me how important it was to keep clean under the foreskin, and sometimes I or others would check under the skin. Once I could get it fully back I liked people to see it that way as an expression of my cleanliness.

I am a bi nudist, and at the beach or in nude male company I will wear my foreskin forward, or partly or fully retracted depending on how I feel.

I'm intrigued about your control over how you are able to ‘wear your foreskin’. Never having had a foreskin myself I am always curious. I explained to my mate that I had always felt extra nude with a circumcised penis. He didn't understand that, till I asked him to draw back his foreskin. His face reddened on doing it. When I asked him to keep it pulled back and walk nude among other guys, he claimed that his foreskin just kept rolling back, but he wouldn't entertain having his glans exposed to others even for the several seconds it took to roll back. His foreskin had seemed short though, as it doesn't quite close over the tip of his glans. Could it be that your foreskin is more able to be rolled back because there's more of it? Are you one of those guys whose foreskin extends way beyond fully covering your glans? My friend's cockhead is slim & sort of blends into his shaft. Perhaps yours has a wide flared rim that helps retain your skin behind the head? Although I'm less self-conscious now, I admit that I wish I had a controllable foreskin like yours!

It doesn't matter to me as I am cut. Being married and also bi, I've always been attracted to guy's with foreskin since seeing others in the showers since Jr. high and always wondered why. That was until I met another and pulled back his foreskin and exposing his RED head. This was so hot to me.

As for me, I was circumcised at the age of 2 months. So, I do not remember the experience. I have always been that way and it has not bothered me in the least bit. It just seems normal to me. It does not in any way make me feel better or in any way bad about myself. I am okay with it and do not even think of it.

Yeah I recon it does feel especially naked being circumcisd

Absolutely not. I didn't even know what uncircumcised was until I saw one in gym class. They were few and far between too.

I've never given it a thought. At school we had nude swimming and I never heard anyone else mention it either. There are enough real problems in the world, without creating another one. It is my belief that over 90% of the boys were circumcised, and this was 1950s London.

I was circumcised as an adult in my early 20's. I can't say that I've ever felt ‘more’ naked after the fact than before, but I left my home country for Germany some years ago and the sauna culture here demands people be naked.

My wife and I were lying in a sauna one day and a group of 20 something girls walked in, heard us speaking in English and must have assumed we weren't able to speak German. They started discussing my penis, noting that there were a few circumcised guys there that day and that they thought it looked better, but one of them said she thought it looked a little naked.

First time I'd heard or thought about it that way. My wife was stifling her giggles so much she had to leave the room!