Small Penis Humiliation during Examination

I'm one of the guys that become very anxious during physicals. When totally relaxed, I have a average size penis and my balls hang loosely. But summer time is the worst, a combination of my nerves, cold room and underwear results are embarrassing. My uncut penis shrivels up and a tight scrotum.

One of the times was when I was 15yrs old, my scrotum tightened so much it looked like I had one big ball. My other testicle was pulled up tight which ended with my doctor gently pulled it down into my ball sac. Another time, in college I must have been 21 or 22 years old it was the first & last time with this new doctor. My penis shriveled to the point where he recommended I should think about get circumcised. He had trouble retracting my foreskin which is usually loose. After a good hard squeeze of my balls he proceeded to the hernia exam. He managed to get his finger into the canal even with a super tight scrotum. I never had a hernia exam hurt that much before or after that physical. The discomfort was equal being kicked in the balls.

I've never had anyone in the room other than my doctor when my genitalia is examined. He has never said anything about the size of my penis. During this part of the exam, I'm excited that he is looking there but I feel very small when I look down. And I believe (just my imagination, or do I spot something in front of his trousers?) that he is relatively well endowed, with a bigger penis than mine. So he has never mentioned about my penis size, but I imagine he is thinking that I am on the small side.

How refreshing to read these honest descriptions of what it is like to have an exam for many guys. It seems all too often there is emphasis on large size or erections while for many it is just the opposite. There is something very sexy about a guy who is honest when it comes to this.

Julie

I have a small pee-pee and a tight scrotum, and find it very satisfying considering my adult baby fantasies.

The ones bragging about huge dicks are into different, mainstream fetishes e.g. foot worship or drag that always ends with fucking. Not my kind of thing and is very boring, but to each their own. Most people would be into something mainstream statistically. Besides the majority of the population, kinksters included, subconsciously want to conform. Hence the insecurities.

I for once would be thrilled to be humiliated by a cute female doctor or nurse, which plays well into my AB belittling desires: subtle "borderline" parental domination, condescending talk, shaming, etc.

I for once would be thrilled to be humiliated by a cute female doctor or nurse, which plays well into my AB belittling desires: subtle "borderline" parental domination, condescending talk, shaming, etc.

You want humiliation? That's easy.

IS THAT ALMOST HIDDEN LITTLE BUTTON THERE AN OVERGROWN CLITORIS?

NO? THAT'S A PENIS??? gasp! hahahahaha

YOU HAVE THE MOST ITSY BITSY TEENSY TEENY WEENY TINY DICK I HAVE EVER SEEN.

hahahahah

does that fit into your fantasy? 😁 😁 😁 😁

Hm, not quite what Susie had in mind but sph definitely played a part in the formation of my medical fetish. Being treated in my mid teens for late puberty meant that it was obviously necessary to show myself and for the doctor to examine, measure, comment and discuss my development ( or lack of it ) with other medical staff and my mother. Whilst I'm sure that the intention was not to humiliate, it was all done in a very matter of fact way that made no concession to my privacy, dignity or feelings. ( UK, late 80s ).

IS THAT ALMOST HIDDEN LITTLE BUTTON THERE AN OVERGROWN CLITORIS?

NO? THAT'S A PENIS??? gasp! hahahahaha

YOU HAVE THE MOST ITSY BITSY TEENSY TEENY WEENY TINY DICK I HAVE EVER SEEN.

Sorry, too strong. Too theatrical. Perhaps common in the mainstream BDSM world, but certainly failed to embarrass me.

Subtle and borderline mean something along the following lines:

"Aww, how cute. And you were covering THAT? Look at that thingy. About a two year-old's size, right Helen? (the nurse's name) What an adorable little boy came here today. Hop up on the table. Helen will take your temperature."

You don't get to choose.

I do not go in for any type of baby talk or sounding childish at all.

I get the dom's perspective. And I am fascinated with the "consensual non-consent" concept I learned from you. But it still... either hits the mark or doesn't. No, the sub shouldn't choose or hint at all, how he/she wants to be humiliated. It's the dom's job. Both sides have responsibilities in any, even non-consensual play.

SPH doesn't need to be explicitly babyish, if the dom cannot stand it. But if the sub only reacts to subtlety instead of loudness, it can be something as simple as "Hmm, it's rather on the small side" or "Late bloomer, huh?"

Doesn't the whole (dom's) satisfaction come from finding the correct button to push and seeing the results? On top of physically hurting the sub, which everyone reacts to.

Or she can just mindlessly play a vanilla leather-clad dominatrix with generic stern tone and standard phrases in exchange for $200/hr expecting the sub to be into one of the mainstream fetishes like foot worship or spanking?

It's the dom's job. Both sides have responsibilities in any, even non-consensual play.

NONE of what you refer to here is non-consensual . To be non-consensual, there would be no safe word and no stopping regardless of the situation -- like a kidnapping by someone you do not know. Berating someone about a tiny dick would not fall under consensual non-consensuality. Tying them up and leaving them with a nanny cam for a couple of days, forcing them to urinate and defecate in their bed while screaming to be released could be non-consensual.

.

Doesn't the whole (dom's) satisfaction come from finding the correct button to push and seeing the results?

In part, yes but there is also the satisfaction to be gained by the domme for simply doing whatever she pleases no matter how the submissive responds.

.

Or she can just mindlessly play a vanilla leather-clad dominatrix with generic stern tone and standard phrases in exchange for $200/hr expecting the sub to be into one of the mainstream fetishes like foot worship or spanking?

I don't know. I wouldn't do it for only $200 an hour. I get paid much more than that to dominate someone, especially men with tiny dicks..

I'm joking, I only do it for the fun of it. A leather clad dominatrix could be very boring if she has no imagination and can't get into the mind of her submissive. On the other hand, the domme could be bored out of her mind if she isn't interested in what the submissive wants.

...........I'm joking, I only do it for the fun of it. A leather clad dominatrix could be very boring if she has no imagination and can't get into the mind of her submissive. On the other hand, the domme could be bored out of her mind if she isn't interested in what the submissive wants.

I've been a lifelong switch and D/s lover, but only intermittent IRL switch D/s player (lack of GF/exes/partners last several years). This above quoted comment makes good sense to me. Neither the Domme or sub is really going to enjoy it or come away satisfied unless there's a good deal of overlap between what each one wants and enjoys. My Domme switch D/s exes and I enjoyed IRL D/s a great deal together because we each got off on what the other wanted to do as either D or sub. Just as a quick example, we both got off on giving and taking enemas with orgasm denial complete with a lot of complaining, begging and pleading about embarrassment and humiliation having to take whatever was given for as long as the Dom(me) wanted. When I was acting as sub, her running commentary about what I was enduring or being denied was a great turn on for both (and also when we switched on other nights).

If on the other hand she had truly wanted to enjoy berating or attempting to humiliate me about my lack of good erections, a real medical problem for me, she would have needed a different sub as it would have been a major turnoff to me.

Eric

Maybe I haven't met a good domme. Have only been with one. She was very pretty. That's how I chose her. She had lots of implements, knew what she was doing (sounding and electro can be tricky), but didn't care much about the emotional connection. And she was very cautious: the part I did not like. It was basically "You wanted this. I did it." She never found anything to humiliate me for. Just did her job. Asking someone like that to specifially "humiliate" you or hinting that she can e.g. by saying you are afraid of something: "I am ashamed of my small pee-pee" takes the fun out of it.

It probably doesn't exist in the pro BDSM scene, even though all of them call themselves "lifestyle". I understand 99% of their clients are into some mainstream like foot worship, strapons, or spanking, so she'd assume one has to work on me. What about improvisation? She takes off my clothes, notices my small dick and seizes the opportunity. Guess everyone is afraid to hurt someone's precious feelings nowadays. Or maybe I didn't go to the right one.

I'd really enjoy the domme getting aroused by her stuff even if I am not into it, but it cannot be 100% hers. It needs to match 30%+ of mine, acting as a catalyst of sorts, so my emotions will continue to flow, when she gets to her stuff. Bonded emotions, tuning to the same wavelength... I don't know how to describe it without cliches.

I don't believe even in the 70% kinks match. So both sides need to find each other buttons. As a sub, I really want to please my domme, but I also expect her to get somewhat aroused by pushing my buttons too. I don't want to keep theorizing about it here. It's common sense.

. . . . If on the other hand she had truly wanted to enjoy berating or attempting to humiliate me about my lack of good erections, a real medical problem for me, she would have needed a different sub as it would have been a major turnoff to me.

Eric

That is true and is why real life problems, arguments and medical conditions are NOT good topics to explore with BDSM activities.

That is true and is why real life problems, arguments and medical conditions are NOT good topics to explore with BDSM activities.

I disagree. ED is perfect for humiliation. What happened to your earlier "the sub doesn't get to choose"? I don't get to choose the topic, but you do choose the right words and tone to get under my skin. Maybe I am a perfectionst.

One can only be humiliated for a truly shameful problem/condition. Anything "safe" is a pretense and lie. Self-delusion is an art among certain countries population. And a big "psychology" business: "boosting" self-esteem. I don't want everyone (with some blemish) to be a masochist, but if you are, you should let go of all your defenses coming to a dominatrix

I have a copy of two reports about my urological exams. The size of all the organs is mentioned, however no indication regarding the length of the penis, not even an approximation. Is it to avoid a humiliation to the patient? Indirect rather than direct, the report could be read by all the staff of the doctor's office.

What would you think if the assistant who welcomes you had just read the length of your penis by consulting the computer file?

Hi, is anyone have the experience that during an examination, you have to strip naked with other people. And they found you have a small penis and you feel humiliated?

Most of us have certainly never had a group medical examination, but there are many other situations where we have to strip ourselves in front of others, such as under the showers at school. The first time I had one, one student told another that his penis was small (it was not me). He had been criticized by the other pupils for this declaration.

I tend to be small when flaccid, about 1.5 inches, and it gets even smaller if I'm nervous or stressed. A couple years back my new doctor [female] after giving me a physical suggested I try Viagra and gave me some samples. I'll admit that it did improve things but I fainted - low blood pressure. After that my doc asked lots of questions and she got lots of answers.

Our younger son was a late bloomer and still had a small penis up until age 15. My wife always took him to his annual exams and reported that our family doctor was always very reassuring to him and stated she would not be concerned unless he did not start developing by age 15. She did note his situation in the charts, but never was he ridiculed in any way.

I needed a testicle ultrasound and it was very embarrassing because of my small penis. I thought for a long time before scheduling the ultrasound I needed. Then I worried about it for weeks. I wanted to cancel this appointment so badly. I got to my appointment on time and filled out the paperwork. It wasnt long before a young man came and got me. His name was Jeff. I was so embarrassed when I walked into the dark little exam room. He explained what he was going to do and that I needed to take my pants and underwear off. He also told me he was still learning this job and that his supervisor Jana would be present as well. He asked if I was ok with this and I said yes. I was almost in a panic, I was going to be seen by a man and a woman and had no idea how many more would see me.

He left me to undress and did give me a hand towel to cover my penis with. When he left I quickly undressed, putting my white lace panties in my pants where they could hardly be seen and got up onto the table. I hoped no one would spot them. I was humiliated staring between my legs. I have such a baby dick... its not fair..... I pulled my little penis up and layed the towel over it and waited for him to come back in. When he did Jana was with him. She was very nice looking.. probably mid 40s.. I found her very attractive and was beyond humiliated to have my tiny baby balls exposed to her. He sat in the chair facing me and his computer screen and she stood behind him watching what he did on the screen and how he used the paddle on my little balls.

They made comments to each other about what parts they were looking at and she was kind of quizzing him on what he was seeing. At one point she took the paddle from him and said "with some patients you need to kind of...." and she moved the paddle really low under my little balls. i dont know why she did it like that, I dont know what she was trying to say to him but in my mind I took it as "some very small patient".

During there small talk with me I admitted that my doctor sent me because he thought my testicles were underdeveloped. Jana quickly sided with my doctor and said she noticed that immediately! I wanted to cry and run away!!!!! My lip was trembling when I asked her if I was the smallest she had examend. She first assured me there was no reason to be alarmed and that there was probably nothing wrong with me, but then said that she would have to say that I was the smallest adult male she had done a testicle ultrasound on. All I could say out loud without breaking down and crying was "Oh.. Im sorry" IM SORRY!!! I apologized to them for having tiny sissy bumps!!! I have never felt so stupid!!! I am going to hear myself saying that for a long long time in my head.

Twice during the exam my fear about my little penis came true. I am simply to small to easily stay under the towel. As he moved the prob around my little pee pee just rolled out from under. Both times I noticed it happening and wanted to scream... I apologized both times and pushed it back under. The second time my eyes welled up and I was truly worried that I might start crying.

When they were done they both thanked me for being a good patient and for allowing them both to be present. I thanked them both and she told me I could use the towel to wipe the jel off and I could get dressed. She told me from what they could see there was nothing abnormal, the lab would print the pictures they took with the prob and a technician would look at them and the results would be sent to my doctor. She explained all of this to me as I sat there with the towel now covering my genitals .. I felt like a toddler in front of them. I diddnt want to get up and expose myself or the fact that I had panties to put on... it was an embarrassing few moments. I wiped myself clean and got dressed and left. I am mortified that more people have seen how tiny I am.

Embarrassment, yes. But humiliation where someone consciously sets out to make me feel less than anyone else, no. The embarrassment is activating internal insecurity without actually belittling. How do feel standing there naked and exposed? is a different thing from What a pathetic excuse for a penis. The latter turns me off, the former on. C'est la vie and on zity someone likes and thrives on what others don't.

Not exactly, but I have written before about group physical exams in school and how intimidating it was when I was about to start 7th grade and having to be undressed and lined up in the gym with much bigger 8th graders and then the same thing as a freshman in high school with much bigger juniors and senior boys in the same lines. I wasn't undeveloped for my age at 13 but it was still intimidating to be standing in my briefs in a line full of older boys who were taller and bigger overall. I was more self-conscious because at 13 I felt like my dick and balls were out of proportion to my skinny body. It was that age where puberty hits really hard and the genitals grow faster than anything else. Enough that I felt like I had a huge bulge in my jockeys compared to most of the boys my age and was worried that someone would say that I had a hard-on when I didn't. Even though I wasn't bullied about having a tiny dick by the older boys in line, they did make the "hope you don't get a boner when you drop your jockeys for the doc" comments to us just to make us more nervous about the last part of the exams. Some of the boys my age were way behind me in that department and got the "looks like you don't need a jockstrap" comment.

I have never been humiliated about the size of my penis. I know I am not the biggest and as I was younger and going to the doctor, he never mentioned to me or my mother I have a small penis. Besides going to the pediatrician for getting sick, I had to go to him 3X during the year for "growth & development" exams.

He would examine me by using the tanner stages when I started puberty. No one ever told me that I had an issue or a small penis but I knew that it was a concern that I did have a smaller penis and I would ejaculate quickly when he examined and he would discuss this issue with my mother. When I had my home inspections with my mother inspecting my penis should wouldn't measure me but she would try to control my orgasm/ejaculation so I can last longer.

I posted the following earlier in the year under a profile which I deleted in haste. It bear's repeating as it forms the basis of my Medical Fetish:

Small Penis Humiliation definitely played a part in the formation of my medical fetish. Being treated in my mid teens for late puberty meant that it was obviously necessary to show myself and for the doctor to examine, measure, comment and discuss my development ( or lack of it ) with other medical staff and my mother. Whilst I'm sure that the intention was not to humiliate, it was all done in a very matter of fact way that made no concession to my privacy, dignity or feelings. ( UK, late 80s ).

I was always humiliated by having a bend in my penis. Its very pronounced and is not pyronies - it does hurt sometimes when erect

But I also consider myself small

I have discovered my interest in Medfet through visits to the doctors for various things going on down there.

I have a small penis which makes me slightly more nervous when going to the Doctors for this reason if I am to be examined intimately.

I have seen a roleplay doc who respectfully did not make a big fuss over this matter, I would love to do more roleplay but my size is a big issue for me to go forward. Anyone have the same anxieties as me and any ideas on how to overcome this, thanks in advance!

You mention you have seen a roleplay doctor and the outcome was okay so why do think this would not be the case with other play doctors?

Surely there is always an element of humiliation and embarrassment in having to strip for an examination. I'm also in the small penis club as you might say, no one has ever said it to me but it's pretty obvious when I have to 'drop them' during a roleplay examination, it probably adds to the nervousness I feel when I anticipate an examination which I find all part of the enjoyment of surrendering control to another.

Johncrossley's comment hits the nail on the head. The best SPH is implied rather than explicit. This can be subtle signs the doctor's reaction when the patient removes his underwear, just a simple statement of fact and no opinion at all when measurements are taken, or even the mere presence of other better endowed individuals in a group setting.

The humiliation is best created in the mind of the patient than from an external source

I am very surprised by the relation of "malephysicalexam" in message 30

Generally the young men had experienced in the past the reverse of what he said about his physicals

I think that he was very lucky that he could keep his underwear at the group exam to which he was submitted for military service in Brazil while most of young men experienced in the past group physicals examinations in large groups being stark naked for a more or less long time, since it was very seldom in the past that you could keep your underwear in military physicals whatever was the country.

On the reverse he said that he had later two group physicals for sports when he entered at college and had to choose two sports by semester where he was examined stark naked with other students.

May be the sports physicals in college were performed in the united States and not in Brazil like the military physicals ?

Besides, I find rather funny the double standard rule applied at these sports physicals since on the reverse of the student's boys examined in group stark naked, the girl's students were not instructed to strip completely but allowed to keep their panties.

I guess that there was rumors about the nudity of the boy's students at their physicals and that it stimulated the curiosity of the girl's students and made them laugh too.

Was it unfair or not?

Now as an adult I don't think that it was unfair because it was logical to protect more the privacy and modesty of girls than that of boys but when I was a teenager I would have certainly not agreed with that obvious double standard.

I have an average sized penis but it can shrink very small when I'm nervous, like at the doctor. I had an appointment today with a urologist and she happened to be pretty young and cute, as I would like to think I am.

When I laid down, shorts removed and the exam began, my penis was literally the size of an acorn, and shrunk within my foreskin even though I am circumcised. I was concerned she might think I have a micropenis!

Once she proceeded to examing my actual penis, luckily it came out of hiding to my normal flaccid size of about 4 inches and she was able to check it in a normal state.

After several minutes spent attending to other aspects like the prostate check, we seemed to be wrapping up. During that time, my penis shrunk back to its hiding state (why do they keep the office so cold?! lol). My scrotum also pulled up super tight.

I don't know if it was just me, but the urologist seemed interested by the case of the reappearing and disappearing penis. I thought we were wrapping up, but she then spent several more minutes examining my shriveled penis. I wasn't sure if the shriveled state could somehow be medically relevant to my issue, and she was checking if that was the case. The thought did cross my mind that because the first time she began feeling my penis, it began to grow (not getting erect though), she wanted to see if that would be the case again out of interest or even entertainment. She did seem to take her time before having me get dressed, but my penis remained in hiding.

I wonder if seeing penises shrink and reappear like that is a common thing for urologists, and if it's medically interesting to them and even sometimes personally interesting.