Do you prefer enemas or laxatives?

I prefer enemas purely because one can take it/them as fast or as slow as required, or time permits.

I also think that the end result is better than a laxative. This is my own personal perspective, I'm not sure what everyone else thinks?

For me the answer is very definitely enemas. I do not like the anticipation and waiting for the chemical concoctions to do their work, nor the uncertainty of the event. I would rather have the equipment set out and the procedure performed from start to "finish" as enemas here are normally done.

Most definitey enemas. Not only are they faster, predictable, and thorough, they can be relaxing or sensual depending on your mood.

It depends on my mood. Often it's just an enema but sometimes I like a bisacodyl supp up in the rectum waiting for the urge to expel and then doing the enema.

Great feeling afterwards when they both did their work together.

Not even close! Enema is the ONLY way to go for me.

Enemas are a much better way to go. The predictability factor is the thing for me. Every time I take a laxative, it either does not work, or works when it is the most inconvenient time. Someone mentioned that laxatives are more crampy, and have found that if I have the time, Castor oil can be kind of fun and works well. Have not tried the castor oil in a while but might have to consider in the near future. Overall though, I prefer enemas anytime given the opportunity.

I prefer suppositories, because of the gradual effect, but I can also get that with a senna enema. I will sometimes use a single bisacodyl tablet, because a few hours later, I get a well-formed, somewhat urgent but otherwise fairly natural feeling movement that feels nice and complete.

Although, for me, suppositories and enemas are generally more fun to play with, My spouse and I have occasionally used oral laxatives for play. One aspect, is that the male may be able to orgasm several times while thinking of the laxative working in his soft, cuddly, delicate spouse's girl-tummy. Also, if done in a wau so as to cause cramping, we can share the experience together for longer than one could with an enema.

Enemas over lax any time

I heard a story at the barber shop a while back which illustrates why I prefer enemas to either laxatives or suppositories.

"John" had not had a BM in a couple of days, so he took a laxative and headed east down I-70 to a meeting in Kansas City, a trip of about 2 hours. At some time during the meeting, nature began to call.

For whatever reason, he excused himself from the meeting and headed back home. Somewhere between Lawrence and Topeka, nature was not to be denied. He pulled his car over onto the shoulder, got out in a hurry without even turning the engine off, and started running down to the bottom of the hill to relieve himself.

Part way down the hill, he stumbled and rolled the rest of the way to the bottom. His gut exploded while he was rolling, and his pants were full. He took them down, finished the job and cleaned up his pants as best he could, and climbed back up the hill.

As he was moving, he saw that someone had stopped by his car and was looking at it in very interested manner. John called out to him to get away from the car, which he did in a hurry and drove off in a hurry. John continued on to Topeka and went to the first clothing store he could find, bought a new outfit, cleaned himself up some more and headed on home.

Quite an experience!

With an enema, you know when it will kick in.

hankb

Give me an enema any day over a laxative. I don't want any chemicals in my system that might counteract the meds I'm on.

Gotta go with the enema. Laxatives are way too unpredictable. Fine if you are diapered. Not so fine if not.

Don't like using oral laxative and very rarely use them. I much prefer using enema bag and on occasion will use glycerin suppositories.

Why would I ever take oral laxatives? An enema works faster and is far more effective. Not to mention that you won't have to stay close to the bathroom for the rest of the day. And, of course, the enema is more fun.

Gewitterhexe--you said it exactly the way I would have said it. Thanks for writing.

hankb

While laxatives will give you eventual relief, nothing beats the comfort of feeling your favorite solution filing you with its warm pleasures.

I would never prefer a laxative over an enema. However, a laxative with an enema is a pretty good thing.

I enjoy the instant relief of an enema over a laxative.

I prefer the enema because it is so quick working.

If I want a complete clean out i take a saline laxative, I live it! I use moviprep I drink unlit everything come out! 😃

I do not understand why anyone would prefer a laxative if enema was available. I doubt anyone has orgasms from laxatives. Enemas do not cost much. There's not much money in enemas. that's why they are not promoted. If the government would get behind enemas the way they did anti-smoking, most folks would be enjoying enemas.

Enemas are definitely more fun and predictable.

Enemas or supos every time laxatives upset hole system

Definitely Enemas. I find nothing erotic or stimulating about laxatives...yawn..boring....

Enemas for fun, laxatives if I need them!!!

Upon this suject I have found the following tip:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/04/28/castor-oil-to-treat-health-conditions.aspx

There catlady123asd posted on 11/20/2015 4:13:08 PM:

"My mother used to line us kids up and make us take 1 tblsp. of castor oil in orange juice every evening before we went to bed. She thought it would taste better mixing it in orange juice. It was terrible! But us kids never got sick. The neighbor kids were always coming down with something. But the Bruin kids we were always healthy. I guess Mom knew what she was doing."

It is thoughtless and irresponsible to even suggest that castor oil has any benefit other than as a laxative. The article you cited is in a alternative journal and is not based on any science. If you read these articles, which I have, they uniformly say that the benefits are obtained from external application of castor oil. Please folks ignore the previous post. The writer is a monomaniac.

Liquidsky

Are you able to prove that this, what catlady123asd writes, is wrong?

Liquidsky

Are you able to prove that this, what catlady123asd writes, is wrong?

That's not how it works with scientific proof.

The person making the claim has to prove something works. It isn't up to another party to prove something doesn't.

Besides, what catlady relates is an anecdotal report of ONE case.

I shouldn't belabor the point but anecdotal evidence is simply one persons account of what is perceived as a causal relationship. Only the scientific method proves whether something is true or not. A double blind study where neither the researcher or the patient know the actual agent is the only way of determining what is efficacious and what is merely coincidence. My interest is only on warning members that the dogmatic conjecture of one member is merely only that. Conjecture without any basis in fact.

As requested I shall note a second example:

In http://uni5.co/index.php/en/forum/11-cause-of-diseases/1043-castor-oil-cleansing.html#1066 on Posting #1075 Uni5 writes:

"I was told by a friend in karnataka that every week their grand mother on saturdays would give castor oil this amount to all the children (he grew in a joint family). She would not give food until we cried that we are hungry. We felt she was rude. But the reality is that, there were 12 children and none of them ever had any episode of getting colds or fever till teenage, until they moved to the cities and stopped this practice. The reason I had a chance to talk to him about this was when he came to get advice for his sick son, who had constant episodes of colds and fever. He asked how can he improve the immunity of the child. He said when I was a child i was never were sick and so were my cousins. Why now all children are sick."

Further I draw attention to the fact that the entero-hepatic circulation will be interrupted by taking castor oil. In order to realize this a double blind study is superfluous.