Examination of your erection

Does anyone know if there would ever be a requirement for a doctor or a nurse to examine a guy while he was erect? I know this can happen to some guys accidentally but anyone know if a guy would ever have to get erect before the exam?

I only ask as I have something 'down there' that looks like a bruise and only seems to appear when it's hard! How on earth they gonna see it if I aint!

I have being examined for how long it took to get hard, and how hard it got. They put this elastic band on my penis with sensor's in it hooked to a computer. They measured for when I got stimulated and the diffrent stages of arousal. I was have a problem getting off. I was physical ok, they then sent me to a sexual therapist, who said I suffer from delayed ejaculation, most likely due to childhood trauma.

Over ten years ago, before Viagra and Cialis, I went to see a urologist about ED. It turned out the urologist was female (her first name was Pat, and I thought it was a guy). In any case, she gave me an injection with a very thin needle into my penis. It was the treatment of the time (and by the way did not hurt). After that she told me to walk around for a while and come back in 15 minutes. I did so, and by then I had a large and full erection. She had me take down my pants and show it to her which I did and then she squeezed it a couple of times to make sure it was hard enough. It was. She smiled and gave me a prescription for more of needles.

Post Script -- they worked OK, but they actually made my penis a bit sore as well as hard, and unnaturally red as well. Cialis works, much, much better when I need it, which is not often as it turned out. Whatever it was I got over it and only used the needle/injection a few times and only when I really, really needed it. (I was having sex 3 or 4 times a week, but had been having it every day and felt very bad because it had dropped off. That was silly of me because, as several doctors told me, it was just a natural sign of getting older.) These days I take Cialis about once or twice a month. That is a remarkable drug because it lasts so long -- almost too long. If I am not careful about not taking it say three days before a medical exam I am all but guaranteed to get a hardon when my PCP examines me...if I do, though, she merely smiles and continues with the exam! Women doctors are such good people!

Having an erection in front of the nurse helped me when I had a problem with a tight foreskin. helped here see where the problem was

Floridaguy,

Yes, that was pretty much what it was like, except I remember the needle being a little bit longer than that one...and the first time I got the needle she injected me to show me how...it was supposed to be rather high up on the shaft and from the side. Also, as I said, she felt my penis afterwards several times by squeezing it, testing for hardness. She was not at all shy about it, just matter-of-fact really, and so it was not at all embarrassing. Her manner was a lot like the blond doctor's in the video, I mean. I find women doctors, as I have said elsewhere, quite "adult" (in the good sense) and practical when dealing with sex, sexual issues and erections, not to mention quite forthright and direct. That makes it a lot easier, everyday almost. I give them high marks for their openness and gentle directness.

Just in play sessions.

Yes---I had an exam for erectile dysfunction and the urologist had to examine me while erect. I do trimix injections.

When I was first evaluated for injection therapy for ED, the process was for the doctor to do the first injection, showing me how to do it, then have me wait in the exam room while he periodically checked my erection to evaluate the dosage. He checked 3 or 4 times over the course of about an hour.

It was the same procedure for me. He did the first injection then checked on me several times over the next several hours. The erection had to be fully gone before I could leave.

I find it hilarious that most of the responses here have just skimmed for keywords and assumed that the question was "Do you get an erection when at the doctor's" and answered as such.

To answer the original question, I've never been in a situation in which I've had to become erect "On Demand" for a doctor to conduct an exam. However, it stands to reason that if a given symptom is present only in an erect state, the doctor would have to examine the patient under those conditions.

I recall reading one of those "don't be afraid to ask the doctor embarrassing questions" articles ages ago, and I distinctly remember a line stating something along the lines of: If you report that your problem is only evident or becomes worse when erect, your doctor will likely ask you to become erect.

The article didn't elaborate on the details, but I'd be interested to understand more.

Moderate phimosis which requires a full erection for proper examination. Erection achieved by injection.

I've heard there now is a urethra suppository instead of a needle injection into the penis for ED. I understood it was the same drug just different application. Does anyone know about it?

I've heard there now is a urethra suppository instead of a needle injection into the penis for ED. I understood it was the same drug just different application. Does anyone know about it?

I tried it years ago. It's effectiveness was poor to moderate for me.

I had an ED exam and the doctor injected my penis with MUSE and asked me to massage my penis as he watched, effectively I was masturbating in front of another man and it was very arousing and my penis certainly got well hard and he held it and commented on how firm it was for penetration, the excitement of him holding and moving his hand up and down my erect penis had me shoot a small amount of semen, he cleaned me up and I dressed and left with my supply of MUSE and syringes, I was still erect as I walked home and found out that a side effect of the drug was hyper sensitivity on you penis, the glans was bright red and I couldn't even bear to touch it as I was circumcised and it rubbed in my underwear and made me wince in pain for at least an hour.

Like a previous post I graduated through Viagra and now take Cialis which is way better.

Keith

I really envy you guys who are able to use Cialis or Viagra. I have been prescribed maximum doses of both of them at various times. Viagra seemed to work for a little while, but it became less and less effective each time. At one point I was taking double doses to get any benefit, but then the side effects were much more severe, too.

My health plan switched so that they would only cover Cialis, so I switched to that as well. For all the good it does me, I might as well be taking aspirin. Cialis has had no perceptible effect on me at all.

Those TV ads don't tell you that these meds don't work for about 30% of the male population. Unfortunately it appears that I'm in that minority. So my next option is trimix, and I'm not sure how to pursue that. Thanks to a couple of friends who use it, I have had two opportunities to try it out and to verify that it DOES work for me, at least for awhile. But there are drawbacks. It is difficult to come by and is not covered by insurance. I believe it needs to be kept refrigerated and has a definite, relatively short shelf life. Excusing yourself to "shoot up" in the middle of sexual activity is rather awkward. And then there is that needle that you have to stab yourself with, though I know it really doesn't hurt.

I'm still debating.

The responses so far are quite off topic as usually happens in these forums so here is a more direct answer to your question. A Urological Procedure such as a Hydrocele on young men may indeed involve the witnessing of an erection prior to the surgery. The Urologist employs female Nurse Practitioners and they do a pre operative physical examination on the guy. Included as the physical progresses would be comments such as "I DONT KNOW HOW MUCH HAIR IS THERE I HAVENT SEEN IT YET;" THEN A COMMENT "WORKING MY WAY DOWN." By then most guys would be semi and the unveiling would totally expose them once sheet is pulled away. Then the eye contact of the Nurse and satisfaction of what she is seeing followed by her feeling the testicles and finally bringing a feature of the penis to the guys attention such as "YOU HAVE A TAG ON YOUR PENIS ITS RIGHT HERE SEE IT." As she literally holds the semi erect penis up by the head and rubs the underside near the tag. The stunned young man then erects totally and thus the Nurse has done her job as his erection flutters before her. Some Urological Nurses will have long red nails and use suggestive tone of voice. Now then do they enjoy this task? I would say they do or they would not be doing it. Hope that answers your question.

The responses so far are quite off topic as usually happens in these forums so here is a more direct answer to your question. A Urological Procedure such as a Hydrocele on young men may indeed involve the witnessing of an erection prior to the surgery. The Urologist employs female Nurse Practitioners and they do a pre operative physical examination on the guy. Included as the physical progresses would be comments such as "I DONT KNOW HOW MUCH HAIR IS THERE I HAVENT SEEN IT YET;" THEN A COMMENT "WORKING MY WAY DOWN." By then most guys would be semi and the unveiling would totally expose them once sheet is pulled away. Then the eye contact of the Nurse and satisfaction of what she is seeing followed by her feeling the testicles and finally bringing a feature of the penis to the guys attention such as "YOU HAVE A TAG ON YOUR PENIS ITS RIGHT HERE SEE IT." As she literally holds the semi erect penis up by the head and rubs the underside near the tag. The stunned young man then erects totally and thus the Nurse has done her job as his erection flutters before her. Some Urological Nurses will have long red nails and use suggestive tone of voice. Now then do they enjoy this task? I would say they do or they would not be doing it. Hope that answers your question.

Your fantasies are going wild again.

A hydrocele involves the scrotal contents. Any erection is incidental.

A professional NP would NEVER make such an inappropriate comment. They wouldn't induce an erection, in fact, they would be as quick and sensitive to the patient's embarrassment as possible.

Long red nails? Only in your dreams. That's completely unhygienic.

I hope you're done jerking off before you read this,

I find it hilarious that most of the responses here have just skimmed for keywords and assumed that the question was "Do you get an erection when at the doctor's" and answered as such. . . . .

Yes, that has been noted and corrected.

I really envy you guys who are able to use Cialis or Viagra. I have been prescribed maximum doses of both of them at various times. Viagra seemed to work for a little while, but it became less and less effective each time. At one point I was taking double doses to get any benefit, but then the side effects were much more severe, too.

My health plan switched so that they would only cover Cialis, so I switched to that as well. For all the good it does me, I might as well be taking aspirin. Cialis has had no perceptible effect on me at all.

Those TV ads don't tell you that these meds don't work for about 30% of the male population. Unfortunately it appears that I'm in that minority. So my next option is trimix, and I'm not sure how to pursue that. Thanks to a couple of friends who use it, I have had two opportunities to try it out and to verify that it DOES work for me, at least for awhile. But there are drawbacks. It is difficult to come by and is not covered by insurance. I believe it needs to be kept refrigerated and has a definite, relatively short shelf life. Excusing yourself to "shoot up" in the middle of sexual activity is rather awkward. And then there is that needle that you have to stab yourself with, though I know it really doesn't hurt.

I'm still debating.

Tri-mix works very well for me, but it's a pain in the neck because it takes several hours to wear off. I usually use about 5 cc's and that's enough for about 4 hours--any less doesn't last long enough. Other than that, I just inject before my wife and I are ready to have sex. As far as the insurance thing goes, our health insurance covers it with no problem---I simply pay the copay ($5). But, the availability is an issue, although I have a pharmacy who mixes (compounds) it. It's the only pharmacy in the area who does it.

I do have to keep it refrigerated, and it lasts 6 months according to the pharmacy.

Never happened to me but a friend of mine told me his experience with a female andrologist of our local hospital. One month before she performed a surgical excision on his genitals to remove two sebaceous cysts, he went to her to check his scars. She wore gloves and examined his scars assuring my friend everything was normal after the surgery. This takes only few minutes. After that she continued with an examination of testicles. Then she started palpating the flaccid penis from the base along all its length squeezing it between her fingers to search for any anomalies of corpora cavernosa. When she reached the glans she retracted the prepuce several times and examined the tightening of the frenulum and the glans during some deep retractions. She did the procedure several times asking if it was painful. My friend answered it was not (if she did not stop... he clearly would had an erection..). She asked if he noted any difficulties in expulsion of the semen during ejaculations and that she need to perform a further exam with the penis in full erection. She prepared a syringe with papaverine hydrocloride and injected the penis inserting the needle in 4 different points on the penis. Erection did not take long to occur. Then she examined deeply the prepuce and frenulum. She pull back the prepuce and insert an urethral sound inside the meatus to check the correct alignment of the urethra. She find some resistance in the insertion arguing the tight frenulum avoid correct positioning of urethra so she counseled my friend to get a frenectomy because it may interfere with ejaculation during intercourse. I think it has been a very kinky examination for my friend and I would have liked it too.

In my case the doctor didn't request that I have an erection. I just think that since I have a sensitive penis, I was already erect as soon as I removed my clothes and had to lay on the exam table with my undies on.

As the doctor would palpate my stomach and work his hands down to my lower abs and took his fingers and placed it underneath my waist-band...my dick was already hard.

When the doc examined my penis. He would palpate starting from the base and working his way up to the glans penis. As he held the base of my penis, with his other hand, he would slowly rub my frenum which would eventually make me cum.

I have had many exams which included a thorough examination of the penis and several times, particularly when I was a teenager, I becam erect before the doctor got to my penis.

I would often have a bulge in my underpants by the time the doctor used his stethoscope or palpated my abs. I used to find it very embarrassing when he would order me to remove my underpants and my penis would spring to attention.

Examination of the penis was however still required il even if I was erect. Many times I was leaking pre-cum as the doctor examined my penis. Somehow I always managed to prevent myself from ejaculating..

I use injections for erections, have had to ever since a bout with Prostate cancer. Viagra and Cialis don't work for me, just leave m with sinus congestion for a few hours. Before prescribed prostaglandin, the urologist injected me in the office and then had me massage my penis until I got hard. Then he examined my erect penis and proclaimed it satisfactory. A friend of mine tried to use papacy rinse and ended up in the emergency room with priapism. They tried a couple of very cold water enemas to bring it down and finally had to inject adrenaline. Someone earlier in this thread mentioned Tri Mix, which contains papaverine. He claimed he uses 5 ml of it, which sounds like an overdose. I use 12 mcg of prostaglandin and the erection lasts for about 30 minutes.

If you had problems with ED and went to a real urologist you probably would have to get into an aroused state.

If its play exam you should walk in with an erection and maintain it until the nurse sucks you off. Preferably while the doc(her husband) watches in mock horror ...lol

I use injections for erections, have had to ever since a bout with Prostate cancer. Viagra and Cialis don't work for me, just leave m with sinus congestion for a few hours. Before prescribed prostaglandin, the urologist injected me in the office and then had me massage my penis until I got hard. Then he examined my erect penis and proclaimed it satisfactory. A friend of mine tried to use papacy rinse and ended up in the emergency room with priapism. They tried a couple of very cold water enemas to bring it down and finally had to inject adrenaline. Someone earlier in this thread mentioned Tri Mix, which contains papaverine. He claimed he uses 5 ml of it, which sounds like an overdose. I use 12 mcg of prostaglandin and the erection lasts for about 30 minutes.

"papacy rinse"

Huh? Please explain.

Had an erection during my first exam and it was obvious through my fairly tight briefs but doctor just took the briefs down, I stepped out of them, she examined my three quarter hard cock and then it was underwear back on.

Almost every physical I have with my female doctor ends up with me having an erection by the time she gets to the genital exam.She just smiles and goes on with the exam.

I examine the erect penises of many young men during play exams. For many it is the first time their erections have been medically examined. As it is such an important male bodily function I think it is negligent of RL doctors not to insist on carrying out this examination on their male patients in the years after they reach puberty.

As it is such an important male bodily function I think it is negligent of RL doctors not to insist on carrying out this examination on their male patients in the years after they reach puberty.

Rightly so, it is indeed an important bodily function. But just try to have this done as routine in our modern day world. After puberty for instance could mean at 14 or 15 in many cases for instance. And since many parents think their offspring will be scarred for life should they ever see nudity in movies, photos or even on public statues, good luck in trying to convince doctors in adding this to an exam.

I know that in prior decades in many European countries where circumcision was virtually non-existent outside of certain religious communities, it was very routine for school doctors to examine the retraction of the foreskin on male students, to make sure it could be properly retracted and washed in addition to be being able to function sexually at a later age ... this almost invariably led to erections - as a by product perhaps, but still a very common occurrence.

I've read on Dutch language forums and chat sites for instance how this is a recurring theme when people recount arousing medical experiences, especially when young as teenagers. But even so, examining an erection purposefully was not part of a normal exam, only a possible or probable side-effect of a foreskin exam.

While it's true that most men consider their erection as an essential part of their function, the reality is that it's not. It's absence can be an indication of other health issues, but in 99 & 44 /100% of the time, subjective reporting can answer most questions from the doctor.

About the only times a man gets his erection evaluated or examined (except coincidentally) are during evaluation for erectile dysfunction and its treatment and cases of priapism.

A simple embarrassing question of a teenage boy can alleviate the need for a physical evaluation.