Men: Penis size?

C’mon guys, be honest. What’s the number? How long is your erect penis? I’ll start: 5.75 inches (14.6 cm).

I'm definitely getting some popcorn and waiting to see how this one turns out!

C’mon guys, be honest. What’s the number? How long is your erect penis? I’ll start: 5.75 inches (14.6 cm).

You measured it to three significant digits?

What did you use, a micrometer? 😁

My dear long time GF says that it is just right for her. What ever else matters?

I really can`t understand why an adult person with a normal sexual life would feel a need to measure it`s genitals - sorry but we are no more boys just in the middle of puberty... Mine is just right for me and for my life partner, and also just right for my ex-partners and play partners - everything else doesn`t really matters I think.

Here are a few reasons why I measured mine:

I only measured mine because I was getting fitted for a new suit and the tailor is very thorough.

I only measured mine because I was flying on one of those discount airlines and they make you pay for the seatbelt by the inch.

I only measured mine because I wanted to see how much snow fell overnight.

I only measured mine because there was a sign outside the prostitue’s room that read: “Your penis must be at least this long to go on this ride.”

6.5 inches, a secretary pleaser if the peter meter is to be believed.

The thing of it is, the metric system is just as absurd as the English system. People love the nice order of magnitude multipliers, but they are need not be unique to the metric system. I worked in engineering for many years and we commonly used terms like KIPS, short for Kilo Pounds.

Before you go calling the metric system neat and orderly, take a look at how the base units are defined. Since 1798 the meter for example has been redefined 5 times and is still nothing you can easily relate to with your body. The inch also has a colorful past, and sadly since 1959 has been defined by it's fraction of a meter. How insulting to the poor inch! All that being said, I can measure an inch pretty damn close with the first joint of my index finger. My size 10 boot is near exactly a foot, and a comfortable stride is just about a perfect yard. I have to say that I can relate much more comfortably to english units in lots of everyday activities.

The gram is at least as strange. It used to be the si unit of mass, but that was changed to the kilogram. The kilogram standard , the IPK, is weight of a hunk of metal hidden away in a bunker, or one of it's sisters. There are proposals out for a standard that can be reproduced without the original but they have not materialized yet. Most of the kids I know understand grams, but only because the price of ounces is out of their reach.

There are places where the metric system makes sense and is much easier, but that is not universal. I think both systems have their place. You just have to be more careful than NASA if you use both.

Before you go calling the metric system neat and orderly, take a look at how the base units are defined. Since 1798 the meter for example has been redefined 5 times and is still nothing you can easily relate to with your body.

I can measure an inch pretty damn close with the first joint of my index finger. My size 10 boot is near exactly a foot, and a comfortable stride is just about a perfect yard.

Since everyone's body is totally different on a scale that can be measured in basic metric units, what would ever be the purpose of using a system based on body dimensions? And whose body would be chosen? And when would it be measured? In their prime? After death?

Besides, show me anyone who can mentally figure out feet into miles (no calculators, that is cheating) and you might have a prodigy, one in a million? Or whatever. In any case, it's not for normal people.

@agracier I don't agree that everybody body is totally different. There is a bell curve and perhaps a bit of regional difference in normality, but I contend there is a good degree of similarity. As one of your feet not very near an english foot or one of your strides very near an english yard? If I pace out meters I walk about 4 paces and that is a a bit over 3 meters. Yards I can get really close. Meters I can't.

I have a good idea, lets all pick on the English and their stones (smile)

I have a good idea, lets all pick on the English and their stones (smile)

Yes, English stones are completely incomprehensible.

Anyway, I was taught both systems comprehensively, the inches, miles ounces thing and afterwards the metric system and hands down, no contest, metric is so utterly easy and simple. Even me, math dunce, can do the computations in my head if need be. Feet to miles and so on I couldn't even do on paper anymore, not if my life depended on it I fear.

And bodies similar? Wow, I am 1.77m and there are friends I have to look up to to talk to their faces and others whom I can kiss the top of their heads without having to face down.

And hands! Some are like spiders, so long and spindly - pianists by genetics you'd think, others so stubby and short. The same goes for the length of their strides. Some I can't keep up with because they are so tall and hence have long strides.

And let's not get started over the need for fractions: 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 of an inch and how to add things like 3/8 and 1/2 and 17/32 of inches? How utterly complicated.

Yes, English stones are completely incomprehensible.

They are easy, you just divide pounds by 14. I am sure you 2 men can do that. 😁

Nobody is answering the real topic though are they? lol

They are easy, you just divide pounds by 14. I am sure you 2 men can do that. 😁

Not mentally I can't. Who can easily divide a number by 14 in their head?

6.5 inches with some curvature, 7 inches when I straighten it.

Not mentally I can't. Who can easily divide a numebr by 14 in their head?

I think it is ok when you think that 2 stone = 28 pounds, 4 stone = 56 pounds, 8 stone = 112 pounds, 16 stone = 224 pounds though. You have just got to add them up and you can work out the answer.

Who cares about stones.

The only measuring system that matters on Planet Earth is METRIC SI.

Even the English and Avoirdupois units are defined in terms of SI.

The United States Office of Weights and Measures/National Institute of Standards and Technology uses the SI as THE DEFINITION of the English and Avoirdupois units currently in use.

THE DEFINITION of a GALLON is 3.785411784 liters--NOT four quarts or 128 ounces. The GALLON is the basic unit just like the LITER is the basic SI unit ad yes, the definition is exactly that number.

The United States Office of Weights and Measures does not even define ounces and quarts, they are arrived at by conversion factors and there is a difference between those derived units and the units to DEFINE a volume or mass or weight unit.

Back to the real topic...

I'm 6.5in long and 5.5in girth.

Measured up with a buddy of mine who was 5.5in long and 5.0in around. He thinks my dick is huge.

Here's a cool calculator that gives your percentile: https://calcsd.netlify.com/

I can walk into a wall with a hard-on and still break my nose.

Well 5 inches is my erect length, circumference around 3 inches. So, no Superman here, sorry!

I can walk into a wall with a hard-on and still break my nose.

We think maybe @Lora_C has just worn it down @Cedar. lol

I could still get a full erection 6 1/4 inches.

Less prominent these days. About .03 of a rod.

Getting the discussion back on track, I must report I can muster a 5.5" penis when erect IF I can get erect.... At 71 YO, age has taken some length off my penis-during my younger days I could sport a nice hard 6" 'er, but those days have sadly sailed. I started taking BP medicine 1 year ago and that has not helped some ED issues I was displaying previous to that. Enjoy your meat while you have it guys!

For most of my life I had a solid 7" and good girth. At 76, alas like everything else such as bank account balance, overall height, friends and relatives still alive, etc. I have less. At the same time, adding insult to injury, my breasts have gotten larger due to less testosterone. Cruel, cruel!! arki

I'm surprised to find out my length equals my circumference at the base. About 17 cm or 6 3/4 freedom units. I measured it along time ago as a kid and hadn’t thought about it again until now.

6 inches in length and 4.75 in girth.

Gonna have to come back and edit for circumference at base, but length is 184mm or 18.4cm. That is erect, held perpendicular to the body and measured from the pubic mound to tip. On the plus side it doesn't seem to be too long or wide for my wife, and isn't that what matters?

Who the hell cares about stones? The only two stones I have are in my nut sack. Sometimes referred to as Cherries. And as far as my "crankshaft" goes I once had a girlfriend who said, "Give me 12 inches and make it hurt! So I fucked her twice and slapped her in the face. I guess that means that I have 6 inches. No one ever pointed and exclaimed "OH MY!" but no one ever pointed and snickered! So "boys" quit worrying about the size and concentrate on your technique!

16,5 cm long, 15 cm circumference. For my wife"s enjoyment.

moliere: My wife does not like certain positions because my penis may hit on her cervix and it's unpleasant. Do you have this issue?

I'll measure mine and let you now tomorrow.

I assume you want to know the maximum size, during erection. Because otherwise it veties a lot during the day.

I think it unlikely that real (fully erect) penis size changes with age. More likely there is more fat under the skin at the base of the penis, which creates the illusion of decrease in size.