Balloon Retention Nozzles.

You can inflate the balloon while holding it in your hands, count the squeezes and see how large the balloon gets before you inflate it in your rectum.

Problem solved.

@SwitchableSusie, may I mildly disagree? I have tried that technique, but it seems to me that the balloon inflates less with the same number of squeezes when inside my rectum. I believe the rectal anatomy nullifies some of the pumping expansion. So I compensate by giving the bulb a few more squeezes.

@Wolf2007 I agree that inside the rectum the balloon may enlarge slightly less due to the "tire tube" effect of the rectum containing and lessening the size of the inflated balloon, but judging by how firm an inflated balloon is, the difference in size of the inflated balloon in the rectum and the inflated balloon held in your hand is very small.

The point of inflation is not the size but the seal. If the balloon seals satisfactorily, it is sufficiently inflated. Its size outside the rectum (the only one you can observe) is irrelevant.

I have owned and used this nozzle since they were offered. I have used it on myself, on my sub and it has been used on(in) me by two professional Dommes. I can assure you that the inflation balloon is capable of inflation to a size FAR larger than any human might tolerate. I've taken up to 12+ pumps and felt VERY full, but on the bench, 20 pumps did not burst the balloon. While I suppose there may be someone out there who could tolerate 20+ pumps, the goal of a good seal is accomplished long before that.

Play safe and sane, but don't fear the device. YMMV.

I have owned and used this nozzle since they were offered. I have used it on myself, on my sub and it has been used on(in) me by two professional Dommes. I can assure you that the inflation balloon is capable of inflation to a size FAR larger than any human might tolerate. I've taken up to 12+ pumps and felt VERY full, but on the bench, 20 pumps did not burst the balloon. While I suppose there may be someone out there who could tolerate 20+ pumps, the goal of a good seal is accomplished long before that.

Play safe and sane, but don't fear the device. YMMV.

OK, I remember the physics but not the Greek guy who first used this principle. Here is what I would love for you to do:

1--Take a large stock pot in your kitchen, fill it with water until it overflows in your kinchen sink or bathtub.

2--Take your nozzle, pump it up 12 times like you mentioned and theb submerge the part you insert into your rectum and let the water overflow down the drain.

3--Next MEASURE exactly how much water you add back to the pot until it just barely overflows again. That will tell you the volume of the balloon/nozzle with 12 pumps.

4--Do it again with 20 pumps.

PLEASE post the volumes you measured.

THANK YOU in advance.

I bet a lot of people are curious what the volumes are.

OK, I remember the physics but not the Greek guy who first used this principle. Here is what I would love for you to do:

Archimedes. The amount of fluid displaced is directly related (via Archimedes' Principle) to its volume. In the case of an object that sinks (is totally submerged), the volume of the object is displaced.

Thank you.

Keep in mind that the volume of a sphere rises as the cube of the radius, so even small changes in the inflation diameter represent huge increases in volume. For example going from 2cm in diameter to 3cm in diameter will increase the volume inside the balloon to 3 times what it was originally. So as the balloon actually begins to inflate, it will take progressively more and more pumps to make it appear significantly larger.

For the record: I find that six to eight pumps of the bulb that Silicone Nozzles supply seals perfectly well, and the balloon is in absolutely no danger of bursting. @LisaK: You can gauge volume by counting pumps just as well as by marking a syringe. It’s fairly pointless arguing about this without hands-on experience.

WOW, All I can say is that if this is the only reason you aren't using a double balloon nozzle... you are really missing out on some serious enema pleasure.

My two cents worth from actual experience with similar "single balloon" products (see my collection at https://www.zity.biz/index.php?mx=gallery;ox=showalbum;ax=7377).

First, the silicone balloon thickness is substantial. Although the thickness of SN's product is probably thinner than the ones I've purchased from Elypseart.com, it is definitely thicker than the silicone balloon material in the CleanStream nozzles. Unlike a thin balloon, this design won't "pop." If the balloon is expanded too much, it will tear (not rupture) at the weakest point to allow the air to leak out. I won't go into the details of polymerization, but the moment the leak occurs the pressure begins to reduce ending the tearing process.

Second, the squeeze bulbs are a fixed volume and while you can lower the volume per squeeze by not squeezing completely, I find that that there isn't a lot of variation in volume pumped per squeeze. I've measured this two ways. The method described in a previous post is one way and the second by filling the squeeze bulb completely with water, submerging the bulb in water, and then measuring the volume produced by squeezing water through the bulb. For example, I have two different bulb sizes. One size produced 50 ml (or cc) per squeeze and the other 40 ml (cc) per squeeze maximum. And, as Suzy indicated, I can pump up these items and measure the diameter (change) as I inflate them. There should be relatively little counter-pressure by the rectal muscles as these are inflated inside the rectum.

Note: there is a slight difference in diameter when inflating with air versus inflating with water because of differing compression effects.

Everyone confused now! Good, now go play with your balloon!

As of this morning, Wednesday October 17, Silicone Nozzles has 3 “slightly blemished” balloon nozzles available in their Ready To Ship selection if anyone wants to skip the extended wait: https://siliconenozzles.com/Single-Balloon-Enema-Retention-Nozzle-Slightly-Blemished-SNGLBLNNZL-1SM-BLM.htm

WOW, All I can say is that if this is the only reason you aren't using a double balloon nozzle... you are really missing out on some serious enema pleasure.

I agree. As others have also described, just the feeling of putting the DBC up your rectum and inflating the balloons, even without the enema started yet, is so good that you can use it while having sex to improve your orgasms. Like the ultimate inflatable butt plug. Then adding in the enema and letting the water flow into you and be retained by the inner balloon is made more relaxing and pleasurable by having the balloons there to minimize leaks. Try it - you'll love it. And, the outer balloon, thick rubber catheter and inflator bulbs hanging out your backside is an extremely erotic sight all by itself!

Eric

User update.

I've owned one since they were first offered and have used it often. Yesterday it was used by the Domme I see monthly. She has used it many times before.

Reporting on yesterday as a further test of the nozzle, it worked flawlessly. I was already pre-cleaned, so the insertion was straightforward, and stimulating. The preliminary inflation was followed by opening the hose clamp and, as the solution flowed in, further inflation to the point of mild discomfort and complete closure - probably about 10 pumps. After that, the enema flowed easily and more comfortably, due to the higher point of entry. I was able to take more volume than usual and there was zero leakage.

In the past, I've had a few blow-outs of latex and silicone (both sizes) double balloon nozzles, even when they were very well inflated. Based on this new design, I cannot imagine that ever happening again.

Unless you're unable, or inexperienced in taking the insertion of the full length (about 10"), I can guarantee this is THE ONE!

That nozzle looks great. I hope there will be some reports about it soon.

Final l'y take m'y New inflated nozzle to try it out

I like it thé post That you post here was like à well made owner manuel

Tk vers much

Two perspectives, the roush double balloon nozzle seals the anus with a balloon on the outside and a balloon on the inside, and it works quite well. the silicone nozzle approach is to completely fill the rectum with a balloon, and that works as well, plus it is not to be expelled. i have had many of the latex 250/250 catheters, and i think they are great, feel good and work just fine. might buy the silicone nozzle product, but the nozzles i have bought from these guys are major insertions!!

I bought one of the silicone nozzles single balloon nozzles. this nozzle is not for the faint heart, 11" of insertable, and a huge balloon. i have a model B and have trouble getting it in @ times, this baby is is in the same ballpark, lots of lube and take your time, maybe. the nozzle came bare, no barb or tubing for the inflation part, but i have a lot of parts and could make it work just fine. the nozzle is made to the same high standards, but it is a butt full, indeed.

That is some nice looking equipment.

A couple of observations: I found it much easier to insert if you stand up, lots of lube, and go slow. Also, if i only pump it up with 4-5 pumps, i can push it back out, so if you want to trust it to hold, more than 5 pumps will be required. When the enema is underway, you feel almost nothing, water level going down in the bag, stomach getting bigger, but not much else until you get real full, then you can feel everything. I'm beginning to really like this nozzle, especially for the second or third enema in a series.

Well I took the plunge and purchased the balloon nozzle from SN. This thing is a MONSTER. However, the firmness was just right for it to slide in without any discomfort, I was amazed at that. I did not think it would. I would certainly echo what others have said about not using it for the first in a session, or allow some flow as it is being inserted, otherwise it will stop up. Agree on the not for the faint. Also, I had to reduce my usually 2.5 quart fill to about 1.5 or so, because this takes up so much space. Five to seven pumps gave a nice secure full feeling, not sure I would want to go beyond that.

However, the firmness was just right for it to slide in without any discomfort, I was amazed at that.

What firmness did you get?

Moliere: You'll have to ask SiliconeNozzles about that as the single balloon is manufactured to their spec, the tip material is not a customizable part of the nozzle to my recollection.

This nozzle is great!! the more you use it, the easier it is to insert, and inserting is a real fun part. If u use a lot of lube, you can push it out, even when it is pumped up , so be aware. what happens is this: you push hard. a little of the balloon is pushed out, as you continue to push, air from the inside part of the balloon is released to the part of the balloon outside the anus, thus making the inside part smaller and smaller until it is expelled. so, the point is, don't over lube , or don't push or pump up more (still working on this, I feel real full after 9 pumps),. Still really like this nozzle.

This nozzle has me very interested indeed, however, there was mention on the page that there was a multiple balloon variant planned for release early 2019. Has anyone heard about the development of the double balloon?

There was mention on the page that there was a multiple balloon variant planned for release early 2019. Has anyone heard about the development of the double balloon?

There is no further information about that, and clearly it wasn’t released early 2019. It’s not unusual for development of a new product to take longer than expected, and SN seem to have been very busy for the last several months catching up with an order backlog.

However, since their existing nozzle overcomes the limitations of earlier single nozzle designs, it’s not clear what further advantage a double-balloon nozzle would offer.

I got an email from Silicone Nozzles yesterday informing me that his next version of the single balloon nozzle should be ready within a few weeks time.

Apparently, it is not going to be substantially different in form and function; the major difference being that the 4-inches of nozzle extending beyond the balloon is going to be eliminated. That will shorten the overall insertable length to about 7.5 inches which might be easier for some people to insert.

I'm sure that an announcement will be made when it is ready for sale.

There is no further information about that, and clearly it wasn’t released early 2019. It’s not unusual for development of a new product to take longer than expected, and SN seem to have been very busy for the last several months catching up with an order backlog.

However, since their existing nozzle overcomes the limitations of earlier single nozzle designs, it’s not clear what further advantage a double-balloon nozzle would offer.

I've used only the latex Rusch DBC's and not the SiliconeNozzles type. That said, my outer balloon ruptured, and using just the one inner balloon seals very much less well than the use of both at once, even at maximum inflation volume. Even my 2.5" hard black nozzle works better than the single balloon. Perhaps if the balloon was a much larger volume it would work better, but I couldn't be sure without actually trying it on myself.

Eric

I've used only the latex Rush DBC's and not the SiliconeNozzles type. That said, my outer balloon ruptured, and using just the one inner balloon seals very much less well than the use of both at once, even at maximum inflation volume. Even my 2.5" hard black nozzle works better than the single balloon. Perhaps if the balloon was a much larger volume it would work better, but I couldn't be sure without actually trying it on myself.

Eric

I have used both and find the Siliconenozzles product better. I have had two Rüsch double balloon nozzles fail, as they inevitably will at some point, since latex has a limited life before it perishes. The SN nozzle is a completely different design to earlier single-balloon nozzles and gives as good a seal as the Rüsch double-balloon nozzle. Silicone does not age the same way as latex does, and I haven’t yet read any reports of failure.