Female doctor / glans touched foreskin retracted

My doctors have always been gentle with it, male or female. Interestingly, they really only pull my foreskin down about halfway down the glans, never all the way. (Mine can retract freely.)

For any medical staffer to poke fun at a male whose penis responds in a normal way to touch or handling- that's not only highly unprofessional, it's also dumb and ignorant. Did these so-called professionals forget everything they learned in physiology and anatomy class? Erection phobia has caused a countless number of men and boys to suffer needless shame, ridicule, embarrassment, and even persecution.

Some poor guy got booted from the World Naked Bike Ride when he developed the dreaded random boner. When the South African government opened its first nude beach a while back, it declared erections illegal. What the fuck??? When is this sort of insanity going to end?

Fuck our misandric modern society and its war on males.

Did I say I poked fun at an inadvertent erection? I don't think so. Of course it's a physiologic response. I only object to the idea that someone would get off on it. Misandric war on males? Gee the last time I noticed misogyny seemed a much bigger problem. Erection phobia? You mean ithyphallophobia? (Sorry I stumbled on that,) Medomalacuphobia seems more appropriate. I'm a misanthrope myself. I just don't care for stupidity in either sex.

I would conjecture the root issue of all that seems to have erupted is how erection and arousal are used interchangeably in society.

Arousal is psychological. An erection is physiological. They are not always mutually exclusive or inclusive (just ask Pfizer).

When the South African government opened its first nude beach a while back, it declared erections illegal. What the fuck??? .

Any idea what the penalty is for this? I wonder how one goes about proving this? Maybe beach wardens take photos of the offending organs? ... ha ha ha

Any idea what the penalty is for this? I wonder how one goes about proving this? Maybe beach wardens take photos of the offending organs? ... ha ha ha

Maybe there must be at least two independent witnesses who give statements to a court...

"I was not minding my own business and looking at all the penises, when I saw this guy with a boner".

Maybe the person complaining gets asked in court about it...

"What did it look like?"

"I handed in video of it from my smartphone".

Ha.

I found this which might clarify things. It doesn't appear to be so draconian after all.

http://www.timeslive.co.za/news/2014/12/13/no-unpredictable-erections-on-sa-s-first-legal-nude-beach

Cant say i have had this happen to me yet but i bet it will be soon enough

I have had several exams by Male Urologists. In each case I was told that if I had a foreskin to pull it back on my own. Why would a Female Urologist do any different? Why would a female want to be a Urologist to begin with knowing that the patients will usually be Males.

I have had several exams by Male Urologists. In each case I was told that if I had a foreskin to pull it back on my own. Why would a Female Urologist do any different? Why would a female want to be a Urologist to begin with knowing that the patients will usually be Males.

Being that everyone has a urinary tract, there's a chance that they might have dysfunction. The difference is that for women, there's duplication of services with the OB/GYNs.

Following your thoughts, why would a male want to be an OB/GYN? Their patient will almost ALWAYS be female.

I have had several exams by Male Urologists. In each case I was told that if I had a foreskin to pull it back on my own. Why would a Female Urologist do any different? Why would a female want to be a Urologist to begin with knowing that the patients will usually be Males.

This is an interesting occurrence. I am confused though. Could the urologist not just look at your penis when you dropped your pants and tell whether this instruction was needed?

Oh no here we go again. Choosing a medical sub specialty has nothing to do with sex. It has to do with interest in a certain system and also a certain life style. Urology is known for interesting surgery and reasonable hours. They tend not to be called at night for emergencies as are general surgeons or OB doctors. It also tends to be lucrative. Besides as Jds has pointed out would the converse be true that OB GYNs should be female because their patients tend to be female too? Once again your underlying global misconception of the entire subject is evident. We don't choose what we do for sexual reasons.

Getting back to the original question raised in this topic, I cannot imagine that the examiner's gender would impact the retraction of the foreskin or the sensation when the glans was touched.

Examdoc I can't pretend to know what the OPs thoughts were. I think the implication was were male patients aroused by having female examiners handle their genitals? From the vehemence of the response I would guess that many are.

I've never had anything like that during a checkup. The worst I had was a testicle palpation at the beginning of military service. I assume the doctor gave a cursory look to my penis.

In general I find that my female doctors have a more gentle touch. To be honest even in s clinical setting, touching my glans does stimulate a response no matter the sex of the doctor. It's the way we are wired.

My female GP touches my glans during the genital exam when she checks my penis for lumps/ discharge.Although it's not a very long penis exam she does look at it and test for any fluid coming out.By the time I have to bend over the table for the prostate exam I'm usually rock hard.

I have mild phimosis, so retracting my prepuce is an important part of my GU exam. I have a female doctor who thoroughly examines my member, touching the glans to part and visualize the urethra. Not a sensitive issue.

Sure. That's part of the physical and part of her job. It didn't bother me and I'm sure she had examined hundreds before me. It's no problem at all.