First pelvic exam today

She wasn't very thorough and had horrible bedside manner. She came in without knocking while I was changing. She used a pediatric speculum, no pap. Then she said she needed to "put a finger in there" and ran a lubed gloved finger up and down my slit and pushed it in to the hole. She pressed really hard on my belly and there was a wet spot on the paper after. I have pics if anyone is interested

That was your first time? How old are you? For the first time that sounds a little mean and rushed for a doctor. Did she know it was your first time? I know a lot of doctors don't do a pap until someone is sexually active or of the age of 21.

I am almost 19 and she knew it was my first time.

Emma..how were you 19 years old 2 years ago per your first post and now "almost 19"? Something doesn't quite add up.

I can provide proof if you'd like, but have been into medfet since I was 16 and lied about my age until I was 18. Not admirable, but the truth.

Emmalee jane i would love to see pics if you have them available that would be great and yes that dr does sound like it has bad bed side manner

Funnorfolkguy said:-

Emma..how were you 19 years old 2 years ago per your first post and now "almost 19"? Something doesn't quite add up.

emmaleejane said:-

I can provide proof if you'd like, but have been into medfet since I was 16 and lied about my age until I was 18. Not admirable, but the truth.

Certainly not admirable emma - we take people on here with a large dose of trust, about age and gender. Invariably at some time or other they slip up. You have to have a good memory to lie.

But it's the truth you say! How do we know that emma?

This site stays the right side of legislatures around the world by it's age policy, policed only by trust and consent. Be ashamed that you betrayed trust

I am not justifying my actions but I can show you a license that says Emily Jane Andersen born September 3 1995, with the address and photo blocked out l, obviously. I'd like to point out that I am not the only one who has lied about my age on the Internet. I was not an active member either. I am ashamed of myself for lying, but you should be ashamed of yourself for trying to berate me for something I've already expressed remorse for. I was hoping there would be some sort of empathy, but if not I will close my account.

And I don't have to justify my actions either, emmaleejane, in remonstrating with you regarding having previously been underage on this site.

It is clear that you were aware of the 18 yrs rule because you wilfully pretended otherwise. Whether you were active or not is immaterial.

And you are quite right - there are people under 18 on the internet (I assume actually that you mean this site). However, two or more wrongs don't make a right. And if you know members here who are underage - and I don't believe you have any proofs - then there is a reporting procedure.

I have pointed out one reason why you should not have been a member when you were under 18. A legal reason. Webmaster takes great pains to stay the right side of the law in the very many jurisdictions where this site is read. It is not for you flaunt the Rule just because you feel like it.

Neither may you claim empathy from me, nor will you get it. You may of course close your account, as you threaten. That is of course if it isn't closed for you! Anything here that is underage, including members, risks a ban.

Whole story seems a bit suspect, unlikely a peadiatric speculum would have been used on a 19 year old woman and I doubt very much if a doctor would say 'I need to put a finger in there'

I doubt the OP's age (and she should be banned for breaching the rules any way) and I suspect she is probably a man, I've been around too long and can tell if a story (and this is a story not a factual account) has been written by a 19 year old woman or a 50 year old bloke trying to be a 19 year old woman.

This clearly is the latter

SJ

funnorfolkguy said:-emmaleejane said:-Certainly not admirable emma - we take people on here with a large dose of trust, about age and gender. Invariably at some time or other they slip up. You have to have a good memory to lie.

But it's the truth you say! How do we know that emma?

This site stays the right side of legislatures around the world by it's age policy, policed only by trust and consent. Be ashamed that you betrayed trust

And I don't have to justify my actions either, emmaleejane, in remonstrating with you regarding having previously been underage on this site.

It is clear that you were aware of the 18 yrs rule because you wilfully pretended otherwise. Whether you were active or not is immaterial.

And you are quite right - there are people under 18 on the internet (I assume actually that you mean this site). However, two or more wrongs don't make a right. And if you know members here who are underage - and I don't believe you have any proofs - then there is a reporting procedure.

I have pointed out one reason why you should not have been a member when you were under 18. A legal reason. Webmaster takes great pains to stay the right side of the law in the very many jurisdictions where this site is read. It is not for you flaunt the Rule just because you feel like it.

Neither may you claim empathy from me, nor will you get it. You may of course close your account, as you threaten. That is of course if it isn't closed for you! Anything here that is underage, including members, risks a ban.

Whole story seems a bit suspect, unlikely a peadiatric speculum would have been used on a 19 year old woman and I doubt very much if a doctor would say 'I need to put a finger in there'

I doubt the OP's age (and she should be banned for breaching the rules any way) and I suspect she is probably a man, I've been around too long and can tell if a story (and this is a story not a factual account) has been written by a 19 year old woman or a 50 year old bloke trying to be a 19 year old woman.

This clearly is the latter

SJ

!!!AGREED!!!

My GF had a "little girl speculum" as it was called during her first exam at ~18/19yrs. She was very little down there and the Dr had to go find the speculum since they weren't usually in the room for a woman her age.

Although, I am curious about the post from 2012 about the interrupted exam that turned in to an ultrasound. Did you not count that as a pelvic? or did it not get to that part due to the squirming you described?

I wouldn't mind seeing the pics.. you can PM me if you'd like.

Also, for the sake of personal security.. Publishing your full name and birth date is inadvisable. as it isn't very hard to track people down with such pieces of information. I know this site is pseduo locked with usernames/passwords, but, these aren't all 100% validated accounts and can be from anyone with any motives. Also, this forum allows anonymous browsing.