Circumcision scars

Do any of you who love circumcised penises get into examining the scar? I am fascinated by the variety of scars I see on circumcised men. I notice the location, color, width, and texture of the circumcision scar.

As a MedFet patient, it's a wonderful part of the play exam. Adds to the intimate humiliation aspect.

For the doc to comment on the scar and compare flaccid and erect - marvelous.

In sexual play, to have your partner play with and explore the textures and contours of my body, especially the sexual components - exquisite. To return the favor - fun.

I'm uncut myself, but I definitely fall into the category of someone who's fascinated by circumcised penises.

On the occasions that I've played with a circumcised cock, I've certainly been keen to observe the placement and colour of the scar - it's a major turn on to see a dark, prominent circumcision scar on a man's penis.

Even more importantly though, I like to see the differences in tightness of the circumcision - seeing the variety between very tightly cut penises, with next to no movement of skin on the shaft when erect, to loose ones, where some skin can be pulled forward over the glans when flaccid.

I love the variety!

Yes. I like to examine the scars. Mine is right behind the head, but I like the ones that are half way up the shaft, with two different colors of skin.

I've been up close and personal with a lot of penises in my time but I have to say I don't pay that much attention to the scar. On some guys, their erection stretches the scar tremendously. My penis is loosely cut so my scar doesn't stretch all that much. I guess I rate a penis on how well my partner uses it to give me pleasure.

Cut at 36, fascinated by prominent scars especially if color difference is significant, but also like ones where is barely noticeable, looks like they were born cut.

While my interest in circumcision started when I was young and growing up in the uk when less and less boys were being cut as babies most English circumcisions looked very similar and usually on the looser side with some skin bunched up behind the Corona and a uniform pale while skin colour so I really didn't see or pay much attention to the circumcision scar back then.

With the advent of easy access to porn, in particular American porn almost universally featuring circumcised men I started to notice three things.

1, these guys all had much tighter circumcisions than I had seen in the uk, even flaccid the skin on the shaft seemed to be wrinkle free and smooth, erect it looked to be stretched pretty tight, something I came to like the look of.

2. Many, but not all seemed to be sporting a rather prominent, dark and circular circumcision scar around the shaft, often about an inch back from the glans.

3. As many of these actors were from ethnically diverse groups, not just white, Anglo Saxon heritage they often exhibited a strong skin colour change either side of their circumcision scar.

With my moving out to live in Australia I soon noticed that most Australian men had very similar style circumcisions to those I saw in American porn.

Whenever I see a guys cock I always want to know firstly if he's circumcised, how tightly and lastly what and where is his scar.

Examining the scar and style of circumcision is a real turn on. Also seeing if frenulum is intact or removed. When examining uncut guys I always discuss circumcision options and styles as part of the roleplay.

My MedFet doctor always gives me a thorough genital exam. Her husband is uncut and, although she gives my bare glans a lot of attention, she is fascinated by my circumcision scar and explores it for some time. Usually there are questions about my surgery and I love it when she comments on the smoothness of the scar area and total absence of frenulum.

Easier to see when erect. That said, I I paid little attention, however, I do notice as I look at the overall picture.

While my interest in circumcision started when I was young and growing up I really didn't pay much attention to the circumcision scar back then.

I started becoming a lover of seeing penises when I was about 10 years old or so. I was interested in the wide variety of lengths and girths as well as the shapes of the heads. I only saw circumcised penises, so I assumed boys were born with an exposed glans. I saw my first uncircumcised penises when I was 12 in the showers in gym class. I did some reading and figured out what the process for circumcision was. Even though the rate of circumcision of teen boys in the Southeast U.S. was well over 90%, I developed a curiosity about the circumcision status of every boy I saw. I was able to check out a lot of penises between public restrooms and school showers. I have always found it fascinating that such a high percentage of American men have been strapped down and subjected to a surgical procedure simply to expose the head of the penis for cosmetic/aesthetic reasons.

even flaccid the skin on the shaft seemed to be wrinkle free and smooth, erect it looked to be stretched pretty tight, something I came to like the look of.

The tightness of the skin has to do with how much of the foreskin the doctor/circumciser pulls through the device before he engages it. If he pulls a lot of skin up through the clamp, the scar will be further back from the corona and the skin in the shaft will have very little movement and he will have no roll of loose skin behind the corona when flaccid.

Many, but not all seemed to be sporting a rather prominent, dark and circular circumcision scar around the shaft, often about an inch back from the glans.

The dark scar is the result of the use of a couple of devices in performing the circumcision. There are three devices used for neonatal circumcision: GOMCO clamp, Plastibell, and Mogen clamp. All three involve crushing the skin, including the blood vessels, to bond the skin edges and prevent bleeding as the wound heals. The GOMCO and Mogen clamps are metal instruments which crush a fairly wide area of skin, probably between 1/4 and 1/8 inch, inside the clamp. The clamp is left for a few minutes, the skin beyond the area of the crush effect, cut off, and then the clamp is removed. This means that the crushed skin remains on the penis. This is the skin that develops the dark pigmentation. The Plastibell is a plastic ring over which the excess foreskin is pulled. At the point where the skin is to be cut off, a string is tied down tightly to cut off the blood flow to the foreskin causing it to turn black and die. The plastic ring and tie are left on the penis ad it falls off when healing occurs. There is no crushed skin left on the penis so these guys have just a fine line.

Whenever I see a guys cock I always want to know firstly if he's circumcised, how tightly and lastly what and where is his scar.

I am looking at similar features: circumcision status, scar location and color, and pigmentation on each side of the scar, tightness of the circumcision, color and shape of the head. I think anatomical differences among penises is more clearly distinguished when it is circumcised.

Easier to see when erect.

This has not been my observation or experience. As the penis lengthens and thickens with erection, the skin, and therefore the scar, is stretched out it becomes less distinct. It is as simple as the dark pigment being stretched out over a larger surface area.

I am fascinated by circ scars. They are so interesting and unique. Thinking about them is one of only a handful of things that really get me off. (I'm against RIC though)

DanMichMan said

Easier to see when erect.

.

exam doc said

This has not been my observation

I have seen and held a lot of erect penises at close viewing distances 😁 and I agree with DanMichMan.

The circumcision scar is easier to see when erect than flaccid because the skin is pulled taught, demarcating the junction of the more and less pigmented areas of skin rather than having the soft rolled skin in a flaccid penis which often obscures the junction of the skin types and colors.

I have SCARS?!?!?!?!?!

I have SCARS?!?!?!?!?!

Just like an old lady with a face lift.

If the job is done nicely, the scar is hidden.

I wouldn't get upset over it.

Ultramegapenor: RIC ?

Since I am very straight, the only penis I spend quality time with is my own. Honestly, I have never noticed a scar, but then I also haven't looked for one. Over the years, quite a few ladies have examined my erection (wink), and I cannot recall a single one saying anything about a scar. I DO remember one who apparently had never hosted a circumcised penis before asking me what was wrong with my penis. I asked what she meant, of course, and I had to explain circumcision to her. She must have approved, because she hosted me several times.I was amazed at her lack of knowledge, but very pleased with her pubic/pelvic abilities.

I do like looking at mine as it reminds me that a doctor decided to cut my penis to make it into the better organ he wanted for me,

My scar is a thin white line where the cuts in the outer and inner foreskin were made and is just behind the head, it is only really visible when fully erect

Cutmedfanuk: What is your circumcision result like among those photos? https://www.zity.biz/index.php?mx=gallery;ox=showalbum;ax=8677

I do like looking at mine as it reminds me that a doctor decided to cut my penis to make it into the better organ he wanted for me

@cutmedfanuk Uh, that’s not how it works. Your PARENTS (or you) decided to get circumcised, not the Dr. And it’s not ‘better’ nor is it what ‘he wanted for you!’ He’s a Dr, performing a medical procedure. He didn’t ‘decide’ or ‘want’ ANYTHING!!

CJ1999: Often circumcisions are performed according to the advice of a physician. Sure, the final decision is not his or hers, but when a mother is told "your son will have terrible infections unless surgery is not done", well...

I also read some medical textbook where they said the surgeon should cut so that the glans was fully uncovered, and not pay attention to the demands of the parents regarding the circumcision outcome...

Pecan nut, I have a Low and Tight circumcision, similar to the third pic down,

whilst it was one of my parents that took me to the Doctor, I can tell you because I was there that he advised that I be circumcised, and at that time a doctors word was that of god,

the consultant that circumcised me had a preferred style, again I was there when he explained my circ to his assistant at the follow up exam,

it is my belief that circumcision does result in a better penis,

So CJ1999 I stick by what I said

it is my belief that circumcision does result in a better penis,

As a statement that is somewhat nonsensical. In what way is it better? Does it become larger, smaller, wider, more easily erect?

Better should refer to something concrete and tangible.

If you mean 'better looking', well, that is in the eye of the beholder and entirely subjective.

CJ1999: Often circumcisions are performed according to the advice of a physician. Sure, the final decision is not his or hers, but when a mother is told "your son will have terrible infections unless surgery is not done", well...

Just before I was going to get married, my father just could not keep his bottled up frustration at my not being cut, in anymore. I got a talking to and a warning that I was risking infection after infection after infection that would surely result in amputation.

Of course he wasn't a doctor, but he'd heard it from doctors and so that was that.

I never heeded his advice and can say that he has been proven wrong. Just another example of the extreme, often apocalyptic thinking that often accompanies ideas about circumcision.

As a statement that is somewhat nonsensical. In what way is it better? Does it become larger, smaller, wider, more easily erect?

Better should refer to something concrete and tangible.

If you mean 'better looking', well, that is in the eye of the beholder and entirely subjective.

I've read some teenage girls posts saying they like the look of an exposed glans therefore all guys should be cut. 😈

I feel cutting is a decision that should be left to the owner. If you want yours cut, do it. If your wife/lover finds it desirable do it to please her knowing you can't go back. If your naked glans will turn your wife on so she can't keep her mouth or pussy off it, by all means go for it.

I don't think it makes it larger but the guys in school who were cut appeared larger than the rest of us which I attributed to the glans being unwrapped and possibly somewhat constantly stimulated. I figured my foreskin probably served to keep the blood squeezed out of it.

Just before I was going to get married, my father just could not keep his bottled up frustration at my not being cut, in anymore. I got a talking to and a warning that I was risking infection after infection after infection that would surely result in amputation.

Of course he wasn't a doctor, but he'd heard it from doctors and so that was that.

I never heeded his advice and can say that he has been proven wrong. Just another example of the extreme, often apocalyptic thinking that often accompanies ideas about circumcision.

Nobody ever urged me to get cut and I've never suffered any dire consequences from being intact although my wife and I did pass a yeast infection back and forth once. Our doctor realized what was happening and had me get a shot along with her.