Intruder, you said:
your information tends to deal with "feelings" rather than substantial information...
Interesting point. Let me refer you to the first paragraph of the first quote that I provided the other day:
[Gender identity] appears to be related to the neurological “body map” and relationship to one’s body- feelings of either comfort or alienation.
In this case, the "feelings" you dismiss as invalid are merely the evidence of what is going on in the neurological "body map." Neurons are substantial things. If yours make you a man and comfortable with your body, that is substantial and valid. If they do not, that is just as substantial and valid.
Furthermore, whether or not someone has had "bottom surgery" has nothing to do with how they express their gender. Most men you meet, you know they are men, but you have not seen their penis, assuming they have one. Most women you meet, you know they are women, but you have not seen their vagina, assuming they have one. The characteristics of their bodies that determine whether they look and feel male and female are all characteristics that develop as a result of their body chemistry, whether their hormones are predominately testosterone or predominately estrogen. Their hormones could be produced by their bodies or administered via medication. You never know which is the case. But the tell tale characteristics of whether the hormones a person's body contains are mostly estrogen or mostly testosterone exist on a cellular level and are not "painted on."
Just because a person has a penis does not mean that that is what they use to have sex with. Just because a person has a vagina does not mean that that is what they use to have sex with.
To say that a trans woman is actually a man because she is attracted to women is the same as saying that a lesbian who is not trans is actually a man, or that a gay man is actually a woman. But we know that is not the case. A strictly heterosexual woman, for example, is not attracted to another woman even if the other woman is a lesbian, and a strictly heterosexual man is not attracted to another man even if the other man is gay.
I really do not think there are more trans people and I do not think that children are pretending to be trans. It's just a taboo that is being lifted. There was a time when everyone in the USA was expected to believe in Christianity. Even if you did not believe in Christianity, you might have still gone to church with everyone else in your community and said that you did believe in Christianity just because it was easier to say that than to face the consequences of not believing in Christianity. Now, in most areas, it is common for people to be open about not believing in any religion at all. They are not lying about this. Such people have always existed. It's just that now it is more socially acceptable.