Urethral play masturbation

Was it Forrest Gump who said "stupid is, as stupid does?"

No, it was his mama that coined that phrase. A very smart woman was Ms. Gump!

FUNSY;

I just read this and i got sick, thinking about what you did, this is something that kids do when playing doctor, not a grown up, with even the smallest degree of intelegence.

What is wrong with you, the tissue surounding all of your (or her) genitile area are so thin and loaded with receptors, as well as the fact that through that membraine, you can pass all kinds of bacteria into the body, make it imperative that it not only be sterile, but someone with even limited knowledge should never try that.

I hope you have not done any harm, she should go see a uroligist, and be checked out, before the repricussions are too great, septicemia, or infections of the blood stream can occur, and could be fatal, dont walk, run to the doctor and be truthfull about what you both did.

For those of you jumping on Funsy, what if he meant a mechanical pencil? He wrote: "pencil and took the filling and everything out so the only thing left was the hollow tube" and that is kind of hard to do with a wooden pencil. Not even sure if a wooden pencil has any "everything else" to remove from it, unless he was talking about drilling it out some.

Wouldn't be my first choice, mind. Mechanical pencils seem kind of rough.

Just my ha'penny.

Mechanical or wooden, what's the difference? IF IT'S NOT STERILE, DON'T PUT IT IN THE URETHRA.

Some you can't (3855)win, ladydoc!

Still, seven against Funsy and just one just one supporter for him, aint bad. As you said earlier - "did you bother to read any of the other posts...?" Seemingly 3855win didn't. As one of his earlier posts said his avatar is "looking down the bore of a 3 inch Ordnance Rifle". I'd vote that to be less dangerous than a pencil of any kind in the urethra!

I made my comment because it seemed as if everyone was thinking of a wooden pencil. If he had, say, a stainless steel mechanical pencil (I've seen them), and removed the "mechanical" part, and then sterilized it he would have a sterilized stainless steel tube. So, Ladydocsin, if it were indeed a metal, let's even make the assumption of stainless steel, mechanical pencil from which all the internal parts had been removed, and he had sterilized it, and used a suitable lube and not just "oil," would that meet with your approval? Not that I think he did that. Disassemble, yes, sterilize, no. And his comment of "oil" is wide open.

Big K, I did read all of the posts about what Funsy wrote. Especially the one about the oil maybe softening the paint on a pencil. That is the one that made me go back and read Funsys post again. He "took the filling and everything out so the only thing left was the hollow tube". Which, on the second reading made me back off from the same assumption that everyone else seemed to making - that he was taking a good ol' yellow painted #2 Ticonderoga, dipping it in 30 weight, and shoving into someone. I'm wondering if you really read my post.

Note that I did not - NOT - say or suggest "Yeah! It's safe! Do it again!" or anything close, as I seem to be found guilty of. I asked those who were making the assumption of a painted wooden pencil if they had considered that it might be a mechanical pencil, and why I thought it might have been one. An assumption no less valid that the assumptions of a wooden pencil.

I fully agree, if it isn't sterile, it doesn't go in.

About looking down the bore of a 3" rifle. The piece had been discharged, wormed, sponged, flushed with water, sponged, and flushed again. Perfectly safe. 5 minutes before the photo was another matter.

[quote author=3855win link=topic=31530.msg369171#msg369171 date=1310428794]

....... About looking down the bore of a 3" rifle. The piece had been discharged, wormed, sponged, flushed with water, sponged, and flushed again. Perfectly safe. 5 minutes before the photo was another matter.

[/quote]

Maybe you didn't read my post properly either 3855win. I did say, and I underline the salient word, " I'd vote that (looking down a barrel of a gun) to be less dangerous than a pencil of any kind in the urethra!

Well we've each made our points and hopefully Funsy will have heeded them!

Yes, I caught that. And I got a feeling that you were implying that looking down a gun tube is unsafe too. So I thought I would spell out the details for you, so that you wouldn't labor under the assumption that the gun was loaded with a quick fuse burning.

I see your point win, and you make a good one. I guess we did all rush to judgement, but I think we were probably essentially correct in our rush - and our judgement.

In answer to your question to me; given all the circumstances you described, the only way I would even think about putting that stainless steel tube in my urethra or my partner's would be if it had been put through an autoclave. I still wouldn't be likely to do it, i prefer to stick with sterile catheters or stainless steel sounds that I have cleaned and sterilized myself. But that's just me.

Thanks, Ladydoc.

And I do agree about new caths or ss sounds. Why take unnecessary risks?

I cringe at the videos showing toothbrushes, screwdrivers, and misc. other things. used.

On the first page, I have already expressed my thoughts regarding the use of things other than a catheter or sound, I will not be repetitive. In an effort to be in keeping with what mike9743 put forward, I find that while I am able to masturbate to orgasm with an appropriately small enough catheter, I don't do so often, it just doesn't get it for me. More enjoyable for me is the sterilized sound inserted to just before the prostate, with one lead attached via a clip and another lead going to a sticky pad on the outside, both being connected to my 9 volt battery operated adjustable intensity/pulse body-tek e-stim unit. With that arrangement, I can masturbate to orgasm to my hearts content, with the ejaculatory pulses pushing out the sound and e-stimming all the way while doing so. All of the ejaculate goes in the direction intended...out, quite pleasurable.

G.N.

Taking this back to topic, i just wanted to contribute my experience with being able to orgasm by putting my vibrator to a cath that's already been put in.... there really isn't anything like it

Ah, the follies of youth... I was 10 or 11 when i discovered enemas, and within a year of that i experimented with filling my bladder. It was NOT sterile. I ended up with a bladder infection that moved to a testicular infection, and an unfortunate ER trip. I was in junior high by then. i can personally attest to the VITAL IMPORTANCE of sterility!!

I will say that i've experimented with all manner of insertables. i think most of what i've done has been covered in great detail already (thermometers, toothbrush, plastic tube as a quasi-catheter). years ago, before the Eb*y site clamped down on medical gear, i stocked up on sterile foley caths and some other hard-to-come-by items sold by a medical supplies liquidator. Some of it was post-expiration, other was simply excess. Using the real-deal is wonderful. Once you know better, do not cut corners on toys or consumables. I digress...

One thing i've found to be quite... unusual, though i haven't tried since i was a teenager, was using a long "animal" balloon (carefully prepared to be clean and as sterile as possible) and inflated it to it's un-stretched diameter, perhaps 1/8th inch. it was my "poor mans dilator". I once put a bit too much in, and the very tip, which had made it into my bladder, inflated. Essentially, a Foley catheter without a drainage channel. It should be noted that if you insert a balloon so far that it passes into the bladder, then pops, you will have to have a urologist remove the balloon pieces! I was fortunate i didn't have that problem. Because of the riskiness, i stopped doing this. Perhaps i shouldn't mention it at all, but i think there is something to be learned from our early experiments. I did all this and more as a teenager. it wasn't until i and started researching medical play and medical erotica online during my freshman year of college that i realized what i was doing was 1) very dangerous 2) not original/exclusive to me 3) could be safely continued with the proper equipment and technique. Choosing to embrace the new safety oriented direction, I set about to study and understand. I encourage others to do likewise. i had very few real time sessions during my early days. probably a good thing. Just because someone is willing to offer themselves to you, doesn't mean you can do "anything you want" as is a favorite catch-phrase among burgeoning submissives/slaves. A wise man once said, "seek first to understand". Good advice to all of us who indulge in Edge Play.

Normally, DoctorTom, mention of bladder irrigation with unsterile materials/instruments and dangerous things like toy balloons into the bladder would result in deletion of a post.

However, you make such good points about the dangers that your post should be left in. You were lucky enough to get away with no disastrous consequences - it could have been very different!

Hopefully, people reading this who have contemplated such practices will read and take note.

I always worry about how I would talk my way out of some sort of issue like getting an infection from a cath or something....It just seems like it would be quite embarassing and not a conversation I would want to have with my Physician....so it's always a driver for using sterile technique and making sure that I don't expose myself to unnecessary risks and opening myself up to an issue that is preventable.

I have been using all types of sounds and catheters for over 30 years. About 6 years ago started estim. Estim is very good. Hands free orgasm every time. Factory electrodes are good, as well as homemade.