Which feels more vulnerable, naked or just bottomless?

I've only been into one Gyno exam with my wife and she was instructed to just undress her lower half.

The thing is I actually wonder if that is more exciting/vulnerable than being completely naked... means the focus is very much on the groin and ass. There was something, well, exciting, about seeing my wife in front of someone else fully dressed from the waist up but with her bare bottom and pubes exposed.

Hm, i would say just bottomless

I am always in an exam gown so I don't think its the same as you ask. But seeing my panties on the chair where I put them when I striped completely sure make an impression on me when I'm up on the table, in the stirrups

Honestly, it's about the same. I was at my gyn for some issues with my cycle while we're trying to get pregnant and she wanted to check my ovaries and uterus so she had me just take off my pants and panties and gave me a sheet...a couple months later I had to go back for my yearly, and I really didn't feel more or less exposed in the gown.

I suppose I was slightly more comfortable with my shirt on and because that was just a quick manual check, no speculum or anything.

Naked for sure. But progressively- just don't give a chance to put the gown back on after the first part.

When i have been for a gyn exam, i have worn a very long flowing skirt and no underwear. Shaved pussy, clean and fresh, i just lay on the bed and lift the skirt up. Always amusing to see the nurses face when she sees just how exposed i am. I always wonder what they think to see such a bare pussy. How does that feel as they spread my lips and slide that cold speculum in?

I just love it.

😃

I think maybe that bottomless would, actually... while being naked would leave you feeling very exposed, having just your lower half as a focus feels more vulnerable to me.

Putting on the open back gown always leaves me feeling more exposed and vulnerable. In the stirrups feels less vulnerable than knee/chest with my butt in the air, but then I am anal erotic.

I have to choose naked, those gowns, the cold air in your skin...

I think totally naked you would feel more exposed. I am always naked under a gown, so my breast are exposed during the breast exam, and the bottom during the pelvic exam. I think the way the pelvic exam's in the UK are done is kind of erotic too, where they have to pull up their skirt, and slip off their panties for the exam.

The only thing that would be better is if the doctor raised your skirt and pulled your panties down himself.

Completely nude is more vulnerable

I'm a guy but I think if I were giving an exam, I would take each article of clothing off of my patient one by one, until they were naked expect for their socks. I think that would make my patient feel the most vulnerable and excited.

I really feel that having a top that stops just above my mound is the most vulnerable feeling of all. I have a constant urge to pull it lower and get fully covered but know that it will never work. The tickle of the hem along my stomach emphasizes the point that I am bare below and that anyone who walks in will see me. I get much the same feeling with the usual open backed hospital gowns being so exposed from the rear.

In France , happily, we dont use these ugly gowns so, the full exams( of female patient) can be performed totally nude or sometime, topless then, after putting top back on, nude from the waist down

However, I think that the most exciting way to do ( certainly for the Dr and perhaps for the patient ...)is beginning in her bra and panties, then remove bra for chest and breasts exam and finally totally nude for the last (and better ... ) part of the exam

I only can say (as a playdoc): only bottom nude is the bigger turn-on for me.

I once accompanied my wife to her urologist for a follow-up exam after she had a kidney stone. We were both shown into the exam room and she was told to take off everything below the waist. We were alone in the room and it was exciting to watch her take off her shoes, pantyhose, slacks and panties; leaving her dressed in a knit, pink turtleneck top which came down to about her navel.

The middle-aged male doctor came in while she was still standing next to the clothes rack and told her to come over to the table and put her legs in the stirrups. He then proceeded with the exam while she lay there with her legs spread and he poking and peering inside her vagina, including inserting a speculum.

It was all very erotic to me; but oddly enough the part I found to be most exciting was when my wife walked from the clothes rack to the table, bottomless. The oddness of the situation was startling. Here we were, two fully clothed men in a relatively small room, and here's my wife walking in front of us, completely naked from her belly to her toes. The sight of her bare feet, bare legs and belly and dark brown pubic bush contrasted sharply with the pink turtleneck she was wearing; making her look even more naked. When she crossed in front of us and approached the exam table, we were treated to her rear view, which was just as exciting. Her big bare ass, so openly exposed beneath the pink turtleneck that stopped abruptly at her waist, seemed possitively obscene in that small room.

That short little walk of hers is a memorey I'll always treasure.

I have never had an examination by a doctor (gyn or otherwise) during which I was completely naked. For a follow-up exam with a gynecologist I'd seen before, I was told to just strip completely from the waist down and put on the examination gown provided. But that's about it.

I will say, though, that a cloth examination gown sure beats out those paper garments and drapes when it comes to maintaining something resembling a modicum of dignity.

Naked, definitely more exciting and vulnerable for me.

When my partner and I are playing, we both agree that a cloth hospital gown is "more naked than naked". That goes both ways, if he's wearing it or if I am.

I like wearing crotchless panties and nothing else for an exam...that way both my doctor and I get to enjoy it.

I would rather be completely naked. One half or the other puts more focus on that part.

I would say both can be embarasing and make you feel vulnerable and depends on the situation.

I have had gyn exam and was undressed completly from the waist down for a dr. which made it feel strange and exiting.

But also have been completly undressed for an exam and there was a medical student present, the fact that there was a strange person present and I was completly naked would make me feel also vulnerable (which also exited me a little).

Carla

I have had medicals before. A few as a child one I was naked and don't remember being overly concerned. The second was at 15 in a mobile surgery which came to my school. I kept underpants on but the doctor pulled them down to examine my genitals. I can remember feeling very vulnerable and hugely embarrassed esp as the dr was female and older than my Mum. Then as an adult I have had a few work related exams all I've kept undewear on and not too embarrassing. I did have an entrance medical for the TA where I was naked. I felt a little vulnerable but it was thorough and over quickly. I never did join in the end.

Both, especially when some of my clothes are removed by the dr or nurse.

Neither feel really vulnerable to me but I was always the odd ball child at the swimming pool that changed in the changing room instead of going to the bathroom. It was the way my mom and I did it when I was growing up. We all had the same parts so it was no big deal (until I got picked on about it behind my back by the youth group girls).

The big thing for my feeling vulnerable would be female vs male presence at the exam not the amount of clothing I had on. In coed changerooms mom and I changed in a bathroom or stall.