[quote author=H2_Ohh link=topic=15721.msg173591#msg173591 date=1232686882]
Mostly agree and good things about the Klystra Clear bag. Two comments tho. First, the standard outflow fitting is one quarter inch in internal diameter. The bag is huge, the tubing is 3/8ths, so why the restriction? For those wishing a low bag height, high flow enema, this restriction causes a problem. Mine is an older model, so perhaps this has since been (you'll excuse the pun) rectified.
Second problem is that it WILL STAIN when taking coffee enemas and or using epsom salts. Mine has turned a light tan with use, over a few years.
Other than that, it is a fine product and worth the money compared to the alternatives.
[/quote]
The original OLD Sherema and original OLD Klystra bags did NOT have the restrictive orifice on/inside the tubing barb. The restrictive barbs are since the last several years only. You can carefully pull out the barb on the new ones by twisting and pulling, or as I have done, literally pull the bag inside out and the barb comes out more easily and without damaging the silicone around the barb attachment.
I know this because we have gotten three of the newer silicone bags in the last few years, and my husband strong armed one, and I turned the others inside out. The bag fared better where I turned it inside out than when my husband forcefully pulled the barb out. The new ones do come with the hose barbs kind of locked in, but with care and a little effort, you can remove them.
We store our bags with with NO barb in place so the silicone can just be in a passive state when stored. We use a plastic hose barb from a hardware store to connect our tubing to the bag that has a 3/8" ID and less than 1/2" OD and it fits snugly in the bag without stretching it much. That gets you back up to the really good flow rates.
So, I agree that the restrictive hose barb should be eliminated.