More time on breast or pelvic exam

At the exam today I made note how much more attention the doctor paid to her breast exam than the pelvic. There was literally no pelvic exam, only the pap, no insertion of fingers or anything. The breast exam was much more thoroughly explained and walked through. Self exam asked to be demonstrated and comparisons felt between the two of them. Overall the breast exam probably took 7-8 minutes whereas everything below the belt was done in under 2 minutes. I realize there is much more a person can do by them self when it comes to their own breasts but had never seen an exam with such a disparity in time.

I'be noticed the same thing. Many times about the breast very few times down the belt....pap smears and no more than 1minute (maybe less) for pelvic exam. A quick fingers insertion, just the time to say "it's done" and all is over....

It is not incorrect, my friend...in the past the manual pelvic exam, vaginal and rectal, was the only way to evaluate female internal organs...in the past woman experienced biannual exam long, througth e quite ever very uncomfortable. Now the technology, basically ecograms, allows to detects female organs better than a manual exam whiteout, or almost more less, discomfort and exposure

I’ve never timed it with my watch, but it seems that the breast exam portion of my wife’s physicals, which includes having the exam both sitting up then lying down, is roughly equivalent in time compared to the pelvic/rectal exams. The PA that examines my wife takes her time carefully performing the exams, and doesn’t rush through. I watch as she carefully palpates each breast thoroughly, actually does a visual exam of my wife’s vaginal canal and cervix after taking the Pap samples while the speculum is still inserted, and carefully and thoroughly palpates her cervix, uterus and ovaries during both the bimanual and rectovaginal exams.

Whenever I read about an examiner spending literally seconds palpating the cervix, uterus and ovaries during a bimanual exam, I think what’s the point of a pelvic exam if the examiner rushes through and only does a cursory palpation of their patient’s reproductive organs? It seems to me that something could be missed. If a woman has her feet in the stirrups and is being examined anyway, why not take an extra minute or two and make sure every square inch is checked for any abnormalities? The woman is already probably embarrassed and uncomfortable, that little extra time likely won’t make it any worse for her, and could potentially save her life. But that’s only my opinion, which doesn’t really matter anyway.

I would definitely see another doctor if the exam was so cursory! One's health should not be measured in seconds. Thankfully, my doc takes her time and talks, questions, and explains as she conducts the exam. I haven't had the presence of mind to "time" anything but it sure does seem like most exams are easily 30 minutes or a bit more given the conversation and review of things. A sick visit is different; that's a lot faster and usually doesn't involve removal of bra or panties.

Real exams don't last very long so this is why I like play exams in a realistic exam room to meet my fetish needs. Real exams are assess your general health but doctors have to be quick to keep the money flowing. I joined VIPMED and the doctor took a long time to examine you but you had to pay $1600 a year to join and you still pay for the exam. We did for two years but too costly for us.