Best Inflatable Retention Nozzle

I've seen a number of bad reviews about CleanStream balloons leaking and failing. What is a good single or double balloon nozzle?

Rusch from medtech3000.de or the siliconenozzles inflatable.

German one looks to be high quality.

I also agree the Medtech and Silicone Nozzle ones are best in class. The Cleanstream ones tend to burst but you can fix them with Silpoxy. There is a gap in the market for well engineered double balloon silicone nozzles which has yet to be filled: these need to be perfectly spaced and very durable. I am also surprised that there not been a competitor to the pricey Japanese triple balloon extravaganza.

A couple of things. I've discovered over time and having owned a couple. First. unlike single balloon silicone nozzles (like the one from Silicone Nozzles or the ones I've put into service from Elypseart.com), they can be ruptured if overinflated. They can also be weakened by overinflation. By comparison, the other silicone nozzles referenced above can be withstand significant inflation and as a single balloon can provide a substantial seal.

Second, although the catalog lists several different volumes from Clear Stream, there's seems to be only one that is being sold. It does have a fairly large internal balloon comparatively speaking to the latex versions from Medtech. The latex ones are good quality but can also suffer the same fates if overinflated.

Finally, WRT leakage; I assume that you are referring to leakage meaning not sealing the anal ring and leakage of the enema from the rectum. Note that both of these double balloon types can and do leak if you don't position them correctly. It took me a while to figure this out for myself (if there are instructions for how to get a good seat and seal, I haven't seen them). The trick is to first being relatively clear in the lower rectum and second, to use Kegel contractions to draw the inner inner balloon into the rectum between squeezes of the inflation bulb. When the outer balloon is inflated, the pressure on the outer sphincter muscles leave no doubt about being sealed. Since using this technique, I have not had any problems, complaints, or issues being sealed and having no leakage and full containment of my enemas.

I will choose the EZM barium inflatable every time over the others. It seats perfectly against the anus opening. It expands and seals with a smooth surface. Fluted balloons, unless inflated to a completely smooth round shape will leak via the flutes. And, to get that perfect filled balloon, your anus is stretched as big as your head...ouch ?

I fill my EZM nozzle with a 60cc hypo syringe. The filling port has to be modified.....but that is easy to do, since the squeeze bag doesn't quite fill enough to seat perfectly. They also last quite awhile...last one i used for 5 years. Cost is reasonable too!

I will choose the EZM barium inflatable every time over the others. It seats perfectly against the anus opening. It expands and seals with a smooth surface. Fluted balloons, unless inflated to a completely smooth round shape will leak via the flutes. And, to get that perfect filled balloon, your anus is stretched as big as your head...ouch ?

I fill my EZM nozzle with a 60cc hypo syringe. The filling port has to be modified.....but that is easy to do, since the squeeze bag doesn't quite fill enough to seat perfectly. They also last quite awhile...last one i used for 5 years. Cost is reasonable too!

Photo or link?

Eric

I ordered one of the Siliconenozzles inflatables, but I have yet to receive it. I didn't know about elypseart, but I doubt they would work for me. The Rusch inflatables are rubber, & I would prefer silicone. So we shall soon see. I will report back. My one potential complaint about the SN nozzle is that it may be large only for the purpose of inflating the rectum. I hope it is an appropriate "stopleak," since that's what I really want. Once I know, I will share here. The goal is to be able to relax while the enema goes in, & not to have to be concerned about leakage. I got rid of my Cleanstream nozzle a couple years ago because of the ridges where the various parts are joined. They made me very sore, & sealed poorly.

I will choose the EZM barium inflatable every time over the others.

https://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=Awr9JniSGdRdMUUALy1XNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEyY3NpdDQ1BGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQjkwMTNfMQRzZWMDc2M-?p=EZM+barium+inflatable+nozzle&fr=aaplw

I had one of these and I thought is was horrible. Inflation tub is tiny and hard to connect - and is always popped off so the balloon would deflate.

I own and use both sizes of silicone DBCs. Of the two, the larger internal balloon does not work as well as the DBC with the smaller internal balloon. Others here have reported the same. The latter works reasonably well, but as noted, can leak unless positioned carefully. Practice, practice, practice!

If your goal/preference is to feel FULL from the nozzle, the larger DBC will certainly fulfill (pun!) your desire, but it also creates an imbalance between internal and external pressure - thus the leakage.

As for the SiliconeNozzles inflatable, it works 100% as a leak-proof seal. For some, the overall length takes some getting used to, as it is long enough and thick enough that full insertion requires the recipient to be able to tolerate longer and slightly thicker insertions. WELL worth the effort, however, because you will be truly leak-proof!

My wrote goes to Rusch double ballon. I do have many different nozzles (have a look in my gallery) but I always return to my Rusch, it’s simple and effective, doing its job to perfection.

My wrote goes to Rusch double ballon. I do have many different nozzles (have a look in my gallery) but I always return to my Rusch, it’s simple and effective, doing its job to perfection.

I had very good luck and intensely enjoyable erotic enemas of up to 4-5 quarts for up to several hours hold when they were held in by a Rusch latex DBC. Wonderful device. My outer balloon ruptured, so I need a new one.

Eric

A friend let me use a Siliconenozzles Inflatable. It sealed very well, I never felt that I would leak. The balloon is up higher, so you don't get the feeling of it pressing on your anus, but once the nozzle is in it was very comfortable. Not good for a first enema because it goes in so deep.

I had to give it back, still deciding if I want one or not. Probably going to wait and see what other designs they come out with.

A friend let me use a Siliconenozzles Inflatable. It sealed very well, I never felt that I would leak. The balloon is up higher, so you don't get the feeling of it pressing on your anus, but once the nozzle is in it was very comfortable. Not good for a first enema because it goes in so deep.

I had to give it back, still deciding if I want one or not. Probably going to wait and see what other designs they come out with.

Moliere,

I want to see this one. Can you post a link?

Eric

I own and use both sizes of silicone DBCs. Of the two, the larger internal balloon does not work as well as the DBC with the smaller internal balloon. Others here have reported the same. The latter works reasonably well, but as noted, can leak unless positioned carefully. Practice, practice, practice!

If your goal/preference is to feel FULL from the nozzle, the larger DBC will certainly fulfill (pun!) your desire, but it also creates an imbalance between internal and external pressure - thus the leakage.

As for the SiliconeNozzles inflatable, it works 100% as a leak-proof seal. For some, the overall length takes some getting used to, as it is long enough and thick enough that full insertion requires the recipient to be able to tolerate longer and slightly thicker insertions. WELL worth the effort, however, because you will be truly leak-proof!

Bburl,

How many different nozzles are you discussing here? Can you post a link to each of them?

Thanks,

Eric

Three of them can be seen here: https://en.zity.biz/gallery/image/184290

@ericmason

This is the "large" version with an over-sized internal balloon.

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/5MsAAOSwa39UttFa/s-l300.jpg

Here they are side-by-side - "large" and "regular."

http://ns2.customwebdesigners.com/images/f2s_f3s.jpg

This is the SiliconeNozzles inflatable nozzle.

https://siliconenozzles.com/images/INFL%201S%20(12)%20(Medium).jpg

I own and use both sizes of silicone DBCs. Of the two, the larger internal balloon does not work as well as the DBC with the smaller internal balloon. Others here have reported the same. The latter works reasonably well, but as noted, can leak unless positioned carefully. Practice, practice, practice!

If your goal/preference is to feel FULL from the nozzle, the larger DBC will certainly fulfill (pun!) your desire, but it also creates an imbalance between internal and external pressure - thus the leakage.

As for the SiliconeNozzles inflatable, it works 100% as a leak-proof seal. For some, the overall length takes some getting used to, as it is long enough and thick enough that full insertion requires the recipient to be able to tolerate longer and slightly thicker insertions. WELL worth the effort, however, because you will be truly leak-proof!

Bburl,

So, if I'm looking for a DBC that gives the best seal possible between the two inflated balloons, you'd recommend buying the one with the smaller balloon? I've used a latex Rusch DBC with excellent results and almost no leakage, but I need a new one. It appeared the Rusch balloons were of equal size and I believe nominally 250 cc.

You noted above that "I own and use both sizes of silicone DBCs. Of the two, the larger internal balloon does not work as well as the DBC with the smaller internal balloon. Others here have reported the same. The latter works reasonably well, but as noted, can leak unless positioned carefully." What are you referring to in your line "The latter works reasonably well,........"?

Thanks,

Eric

I recommend the Silicon Nozzles inflatable balloon as you can use this after suppositories and a clean-out enema: its for deep insertion into a relaxed bottom which has been partially cleared.I do wish they would bring out a double balloon version as there is no currently no robust silicone DBL on the market. The Rusch ones are fine but are no good if you are allergic to latex or you want to do regular oil enemas. BTW if you have excellent sphincter control, as I do , you can insert both balloons into the anus and then inflate: a totally thrilling experience for a large enema eg coffee.

I recommend the Silicon Nozzles inflatable balloon as you can use this after suppositories and a clean-out enema: its for deep insertion into a relaxed bottom which has been partially cleared.I do wish they would bring out a double balloon version as there is no currently no robust silicone DBL on the market. The Rusch ones are fine but are no good if you are allergic to latex or you want to do regular oil enemas. BTW if you have excellent sphincter control, as I do , you can insert both balloons into the anus and then inflate: a totally thrilling experience for a large enema eg coffee.

I love using my latex DBC. Why would I insert both balloons at once?

Eric

I love using my latex DBC. Why would I insert both balloons at once?

Eric

My guess is for more balloon volume in the rectum.

My guess is for more balloon volume in the rectum.

Moliere,

That would likely be true, essentially doubling the balloon volume in your rectum. I was curious just because the only reason I use a DBC is as recommended, one balloon in, one balloon out of the rectum to provide a water seal between the two balloons. So I didn't see the point of inserting both balloons, since it seems that that method would decrease the ability of the balloons to seal against leaks during an enema.

Eric

@ericmason

"Reasonably well" acknowledged an earlier post about positioning the smaller DBC to minimize leakage. It works, but unless both balloons are inflated to a FULL size - AND - are aligned well, there can be incidental leakage.

In contrast, the SiliconeNozzles inflatable balloon nozzle inflates deeper inside and to a larger diameter, making leakage nearly impossible. The outside retention flange makes leakage slightly more unlikely, particularly if you have a partner as the operator, but I have found it quite effective for solo play, as well.

The longest lasting and most comfortable for me are the Rusch latex ones. I love the feel and security of them.

The longest lasting and most comfortable for me are the Rusch latex ones. I love the feel and security of them.

I loved my Rusch latex DBC. It let me hold almost any volume for any time without leaking, even during orgasms. And it felt wonderful just being inserted and inflated even before the enema started running in. My maximums without leaks including orgasms were:

5 quarts for over 30 minutes,

4 quarts for over 60 minutes, partly sleeping,

2-3 quarts for 3-4 hours and 2-3 quarts overnight for ~6-7 hours,

the last with my ex Domme partner making me hold it while making me do submissive tasks including her orgasms.

Eric

Mrdtv mentions a Japanese triple balloon product. Haven't heard of it before. Can anyone share details or links?

I love my Latex DB. It keeps me from leaking, feels great and has held up well. I purchased it on eBay from a German supplier. It was about $100.00 with shipping, but well worth it.

In my youth I made the mistake of ordering the larger Klystra nozzle.

It's a thrilling experience, but the small would be much more convenient for everyday use.

Klystra Silicon double and latex double are our faves by a lot!

Klystra made good ones but that company has been out of business for many years so they're basically unavailable.

The latex ones by Rusch are great but hard to find and expensive when you do. This recently got worse as they announced they're not making them any more. ( at least the double balloon ones )

Silicone nozzles dot com made a decent one, but they're often out of stock on them.

And the inflatable butt plugs that you'll often see advertised are tough to insert and are not of the best quality.

So basically, currently, I don't think there is a good source for an inflatable retention nozzle, and that sucks.