What do women think about circumcision?

I've heard of female friends with a preference one way or another, yes, but I've never personally experienced problems from the uncut guys, although most did not have a large overhang.

And no, didn't see my little bro's surgery - the doctor suggested mum and I take a walk around the block and come back in afterwards.

I've heard of female friends with a preference one way or another, yes, but I've never personally experienced problems from the uncut guys, although most did not have a large overhang.

And no, didn't see my little bro's surgery - the doctor suggested mum and I take a walk around the block and come back in afterwards.

Everyone in my family has been cut but I never wanted to see it get done. I can remember them coming home from the hospital with a small collar looking thing over the area it was cut that fell off after a week or so. Whole thing makes me cringe.

Everyone in my family has been cut but I never wanted to see it get done. I can remember them coming home from the hospital with a small collar looking thing over the area it was cut that fell off after a week or so.

The “small collar” is the ring from a Plastibell device. A surgical tie is cinched down over the foreskin with the bell between the head of the penis and the foreskin. The foreskin falls off leaving a clean circumcision. Mine was done with one of these because I found the parents’ information sheet in my mother’s things.

The singer P!nk once posted a photo of her with her kids. Her toddler boy did not have a diaper, and people saw she had him circumcised. Much criticism ensued.

She defended routine infant circumcision as a parenting, cosmetic choice.

I much prefer cut. Until a few years ago, I only had two sex partners and they were both cut. Perhaps that is the real reason. I like the visuals of a cut penis. Beyond that, I don’t like the extra skin. It is also more difficult to get a condom on if he is not fully erect.

Dita

My first hubby was European and uncut. My current husband is American and cut. It makes no difference to me.

I'm not a woman, so I cant really say what women prefer. Living in America and being uncut, mine was the first intact penis all my girl friends had been with. They all claim they liked it, some even claimed to prefer it, but in a relationship it's not really an abstract judgement. Being nice to your partner and all.

I do wish to comment about reoccurent theme that an uncut penis may smell worse. Now, being intact I was aware at young age that hygiene and lack of could lead to funk. I imagine all people are aware of that. For myself, I always practiced very good hygiene down there for the simple fact that I never wanted my penis to be off putting to a girl close enough to smell it. So a man who doesnt wash his penis properly likely doesnt have the consideration for his partners that I would think appropriate. For my part I'm fairly obsessive with hygiene and my only scent is of Axe body wash, lol.

But is a little scent acceptable? I doubt anyone who has gone down on a woman hasn't notice a slight "scent of a woman". Certainly not funk or bad smell, because although that does happen too, it's back to a hygiene or health issue. But the almost sweet smell of her sex that gets your hormones pumping and tells your body it's time for sex. I for one love that. Each woman is a little different in taste and scent, just like their kisses.

So shouldn't a man have a slightly "manly" smell when unsheathing his sex organ too? I guessing that if that once was the case it has been lost in generations of infant circumcision and is now viewed as an anomaly due to the foreignness of foreskin altogether. Perhaps the "smell" isnt as bad as some claim and more the result of a new experience, different look, different function, and different scent to an extent.

I dunno, just a thought I had. If I like the smell and taste of a womans sex, wouldn't the reverse be true. And maybe the bad rap is the result of extreme cases, not normal men.

Aussie married to a German. My wife had had circumcised partners before she met me (one German guy, one South African guy) and uncut partners. She tells me she doesn't really care, but if push came to shove she would choose circumcised. I've badgered about this a bit because she's married to me, but she is a pragmatic German for whom feelings count very little, and she has point blank told me she would have the same preference (and tell me) if I was uncircumcised, so I tend to believe her.

Again - she's pretty ambivalent about the issue but she has said she finds vaginal penetration more satisfying when the guy has been circumcised.

Apparently, the singer P!nk supports routine infant circumcision (she posted a picture where her circumcised son appeared without his nappy), claiming it's just "cosmetic surgery".

https://evoke.ie/2019/04/01/showbiz/singer-pink-defends-snap

Apparently, the singer P!nk supports routine infant circumcision (she posted a picture where her circumcised son appeared without his nappy), claiming it's just "cosmetic surgery".

https://evoke.ie/2019/04/01/showbiz/singer-pink-defends-snap

She must have gotten a LOT of flak about that because all that's there is a blacked out version now.

I don't see why followers and supposedly friends of hers would give her a ration of shit about a personal decision. I'm not circumcised and I do have a lot of fun with my foreskin but it would be gone if I had a lover/wife who wanted it gone for her pleasure and so she could/would gave it the attention I desire.

She seems to be old enough to promote her own opinion and tell those who don't like it where they can go. I just hope she didn't get him a vanilla chop job as there are types that will provide him with much improved pleasure.

Atta girl Pink

Apparently, the singer P!nk supports routine infant circumcision (she posted a picture where her circumcised son appeared without his nappy), claiming it's just "cosmetic surgery".

p

And cosmetic surgery is not suited for the under-age unless there is a dire and shown need. At which time it is not 'cosmetic surgery' anymore, but necessary corrective surgery.

I wonder what women like her would think if there were some part of the female body that could be routinely surgically removed at birth.

As women rightly say: my body, my choice. She should extend the same courtesy to newly born boys.

I wonder what women like her would think if there were some part of the female body that could be routinely surgically removed at birth.

Actually Dr. Kellogg and his cohorts DID promote circumcision for both boys and girls to discourage masturbation.

It's a much easier and simpler operation on a girl. It can be just a dorsal slit of the hood which allows it to stay open so the clit is completely uncovered. Probably wouldn't even require any surgical tape for anesthesia. That quick cut would be over before the baby knew it happened. Of course the hood could be fully removed more like removing the foreskin on a boy. That would probably require taping down arms and legs.

I do have to wonder why torturing baby boys became popular while torturing baby girls did not. I think girls are more prone to discovering the joys of masturbation on their own while boys usually have to learn about it from other boys.

Maybe mothers secretly want to pay back the boy for the pain he inflicted on her pussy on the out. But girls inflict the same pain too. It IS a conundrum when it should have been a condom.

As I have never been with an uncut guy, I cannot state a preference.

I will add a question.

When women talk about preference, do you refer to the flaccid state visual or the mechanics/visual when erected and performing sex? (or both)

I ask that because in many cases, the flaccid state look is quite different from the erected one. (in my case even there are variations in flaccid state, depending of temperature and other factors).

Growers as a I am, can have even partial glans coverage in flaccid but when erected are quite tight and 0 glans coverage.

In fact both intact and uncut penises show a wide range of appearance, in flaccid or erection.

Thanks

I will add a question.

When women talk about preference, do you refer to the flaccid state visual or the mechanics/visual when erected and performing sex? (or both)

In fact both intact and uncut penises show a wide range of appearance, in flaccid or erection.

A very good qualifying question. When erect, most look more or less the same regarding retraction of the foreskin. But when flaccid there is a huge difference.

No answer?

I really think that circumfetishists women are a myth. May be a few ones, specially the young ones who never tried an intact penis, but I guess that women don't really worry about it: "If It's clean and It works, that's ok"

My wife says that after my circumcision, "your penis is perfect" , she promised me lot of things before, but the truth is that after the novelty has gone out,.... she's again in her "comfort zone": kisses, a lot of foreplay, a lot of cunnilingus, then blowjob and finally PIV. Part of the problem is that she has so much body control that she can orgasm over and over (and she squirts, I must say SQUIRTS a looot, we use 1-2 draw sheets almost every night) , and when PIV arrives is tired and want it in the more convential way.

When I remind her she promised me to be examined -specially my penis- as whe will do with an slave, or to tie me to bed to perform a post orgasm torture handjob.... she sighs and look at me as if I was a kid.

Soapy4me said:

Frankly, if the status of my penis is a deal breaker, then I would certainly be pleased to know it, because you're WAY to shallow to waste my time with! Just sayin'!

bbw4doc said:

Would you say the same of someone who finds being fat a deal breaker?

That is not the same comparrison. it is rather comparing it to big or small labia.

I am uncircumcised as most of the others are from eu. I have just enough skin to cover the head but not overlap too much and when I pull it back it can stay back even if I am not erect.

The appearance of cut penis looks better because let's agree it just looks better but I can't imagine myself with cut penis. When I pull the foreskin and and have it in underwear it just feels weird since the head has a softer more sensitive skin and it would dry up and feel weird rubbing against cloth or whatever.

Then again I have read some topics where some guys who did get circumcised later in life said that they have lost some of the feel of pleasure. While I don't think there is a lot of sensation in skin, circumcision definitely changes how things work during sex. Circumcised dick has to slide 100% while uncircumcised has some extra skin that protects main shaft and it is sliding more in it's own skin.

What is the difference in penetration I will probably never know but for masturbation it definitely makes life a lot more easy with just a little spit it just glides while the other way around it takes more effort.

I have read a lot of times where females would question hygiene of uncurmcised dick. While being covered there is more protection to keep moisture but we guys like to keep it clean. if you don't keep your hygene it will be smelly circumcised or not.

In the conclusion we can agree to disagree that circumcised looks nicer while fully erect.

I would like to hear some more input from ladies on difference how does it feel inside you. What do you like more? (I won't get circumcised no matter what }😃 )

When women talk about preference, do you refer to the flaccid state visual or the mechanics/visual when erected and performing sex? (or both)

Well @BMJ it is not really any different for my husband because his foreskin does not really go back if it just gets erect, I retract it with my fingers and I like doing that. I really like his foreskin so that is what I prefer. I have only been with him and I love how he feels inside me when we have sex so that is good enough for me.

I really think that circumfetishists women are a myth. May be a few ones, specially the young ones who never tried an intact penis, but I guess that women don't really worry about it: "If It's clean and It works, that's ok"

I think some ladies think like that and they do not care but l think a lot prefer one or the other too. Some of my friends have tried both and they say they like foreskins because they feel better to them inside and they are better for hand jobs too. I have got friends who think circumcised is just too in your face. I like what uncircumcised penises look like, we do not all just want to see all of it. I like to play with my husband's foreskin and move it forwards and backwards. I have got other friends who like circumcised because they like how they feel or they just like to see all of the glans. We just do not all like the same thing.

@Emerald said

The appearance of cut penis looks better because let's agree it just looks better but I can't imagine myself with cut penis. ...

In the conclusion we can agree to disagree that circumcised looks nicer while fully erect.

With respect, that is only your own personal, subjective opinion. It doesn't represent the views of different women, and this thread is intended for them to state what they, as individuals, think about the subject.

There are no definitive conclusions to be reached.

First, I thank all the ladies for your kind answers.

In the conclusion we can agree to disagree that circumcised looks nicer while fully erect.

I think that in erection there'are less visual differences than in flaccid state. I mean that an intact penis with a flexible frenulum can retract foreskin quite low, and visually doesn't look so much different from circumcised one. May be the penises with long foreskin and short frenulum have a different look (the tight frenulum limits the retraction).

My latest partner (#5 from my previous post about a year ago) ended up very much liking my uncut unit, but I never figured out if she had a preference one way or the other. While I did ask about infant circumcision, she said she never thought much about it, but was leaning toward not doing it if she were to have any boys. Her one previous partner was cut and she was quite enthusiastic about his dick (it was bigger than mine and she liked it rough).

For women in my age group of ~30 years old, in California, if the topic comes up, I've asked them and gotten the following responses:

- never had uncut before and was curious about it

- no preference

- never had uncut so wouldn't know

- preferred cut (she is from a Jewish family)

- never had uncut before

- no preference

- no preference

- did not state a preference, but was anti-circumcision

Alright guys and gals. I am 52 years old and happily married for the last 30+ years. I was one of the very few who had their foreskin attached in high school as it still is today. As I recall, a high school girlfriend was intrigued with the novelty of something different. When I was sporting a condom, the feeling for her was similar to a circumsized penis as the foreskin was pulled back and the condom rolled on. If the condom was tight, the excessive skin was left back at the end of the condom and either she needed to lubricated or the condom. When we the relationship grew, the condoms were dropped. That felt completely different for me and her. Since the skin on the penis slides up and down several inches, the pleasure both of us were feeling was my inner penis shaft was sliding inside by exterior skin. As the stoking motion happens, there is a delay in the exterior skin sliding after the penis has completed the stroke. That delay drove her to some of her best orgasms (or whatever that was we were doing in high school). You see there was a delay as her sensation of my shaft with all of its inner texturing created an anomaly delay she had never felt before. So if you are interested in circumcising later in life, I would urge you to have intercourse with your mate utilizing a tight condom with the head portion cut off. You have the full sensation of the head of your penis exposed, but the skin motion on your shaft is lost and some form of lubrication is necessary. Then try without the condom. It's a free country so the choice is yours; however, there is no going back. Gals, did I nail it! Pun intended..

It's a free country so the choice is yours; however, there is no going back.

You probably think that the USA is a free country, but the majority of boys were or are circumcised without having a choice in this free county, like in many other countries.

You probably think that the USA is a free country, but the majority of boys were or are circumcised without having a choice in this free county, like in many other countries.

When circumcized as a new born, they would not be able to make the choice themselves. Parents make the choice for them and hope it is the correct one. Otherwise the decision would have to be made at an older age with possible more pain/discomfort or complications from the surgery.

Now can we let the ladies have their say about circumcise as that is what the topic is asking about.

When circumcized as a new born, they would not be able to make the choice themselves. Parents make the choice for them and hope it is the correct one. Otherwise the decision would have to be made at an older age with possible more pain/discomfort or complications from the surgery.

The thing about male circumcision at birth, is that the procedure is overwhelmingly a religious mandatory requirement and in a few other countries something more of a social conformity statement.

Very seldom is there any medical indication that requires removing a newborn's foreskin.

Circumcision at birth is pre-emptive strike thinking (aside from the religious angle which is impossible to reason with anyway). You never know, so let's remove those tonsils and appendix as well. Get them before they get us ... ha ha

@agracier And to a large extent circumcision later in childhood is also a preventive strike: the foreskin is removed to prevent possible future infection and difficulties in case it does not ease out naturally, through masturbation and erections. It is seldom the case that circumcision "cures" an actual immediate issue (the exceptions are paraphimosis and repeated balanitis).

Very seldom is there any medical indication that requires removing a newborn's foreskin.

Circumcision at birth is pre-emptive strike thinking (aside from the religious angle which is impossible to reason with anyway). You never know, so let's remove those tonsils and appendix as well. Get them before they get us ... ha ha

Lets remove breasts too, they are well known to develop cancer and a clitoris is not necessary.

There are a lot of men posting on this topic that is for LADIES. The men should stop hijacking it and post on their own topics instead.

There are a lot of men posting on this topic that is for LADIES. The men should stop hijacking it and post on their own topics instead.

I created a new topic:

What do men think about circumcision?

https://en.zity.biz/index.php?mx=forum;ox=display;msg=1337220

Medical Doctors in Canada recommended circumcision for health reasons in the 1960s and earlier for all male babies. Keeping the penis clean and reducing the risk of STDs. This procedure was performed soon after the baby was born within 48 hours to 10 days.

From what I have read here there appear to be some good reasons to have it done early in life to prevent problems down the road.

I do not see anything wrong with this practice.

Personally, I do not like cock cheese. I am not alone in this culinary pickiness. Circumcision may promote the chance of a blow job.

I find myself giving a peek-a-boo pecker a tongue bath regularly. Can't say I particularly enjoy it. What it is attached to is not that bad a thing so I endure it.