Intrusive psychological questioning and physical examination

You have no idea. The thought of spilling the beans to a complete stranger. It makes me near squirm. Honestly think I have some honesty fetish or something. Telling someone my secrets is a turn on in and of itself. Being embarrassed by my own words. Describing my own actions. And me stumbling at times. Having to be coerced to utter the words rooted deeply in only my psyche.

Yes. This is an extremely erotic scenario with me. The more personal and intrusive, the better. Love your thinking, OP.

You have no idea. The thought of spilling the beans to a complete stranger. It makes me near squirm. Honestly think I have some honesty fetish or something. Telling someone my secrets is a turn on in and of itself.

I would think that telling sexual secrets to a stranger is far easier than to someone you know. You can always completely dismiss a stranger from your life if it turns out to have been a mistake, but with friends that is harder to do.

But I too would like to be coerced, lured or maybe even hypnotized into telling my deepest sexual secrets and fantasies to someone I don't know. I even find describing such things to myself as if I were another person present, also arousing in the right setting. Preferably in the total dark, maybe as in a sensory deprivation chamber of sorts, where I could feel disembodied from myself.

The thought of spilling the beans to a complete stranger.

It's kind of what allot of us do here.... 🙄

It's kind of what allot of us do here.... 🙄

Having had to endure a couple of real Life Style Polygraphs, I would have to say no to the question of liking it. Here on Zity it is much less personal.

Going off on a tangent, but "spilling the beans" is an interesting phrase. Doing a GPT4 AI search shows it believed to have ancient roots. - originated in ancient Greece during a voting process. Black and white beans used to cast votes.. ancient Egyptian rituals revealing the secrets or intentions of the ceremony.

@Enough thank you. I often wondered where the saying came from.

English is such a fascinating ( and often frustrating) language

To answer the original question,

Anyone like the idea of psychological questioning from a psychologist type character about deep feelings admitting fantasies as well as the physical examination ?

Absolutely I like that Idea! esp as interviewer, it is wonderful to " tease out the details" and get an interviewee reveal a bit more than they originally bargained for.

I have a Psychologist, and I told him about my fetishness, his reply was, "Thank God you're human". So in your queation it is absolutely ok to discuss this and if they judge ir find it weird, then find another Psychologist.

There are ethics rules in this. These rules are, It is client lead, client must trust the Psychologist and build that rapport. If Psychologist judges the client then the client can feel hurt and the therapy won't work. Amongst other acts as well but these are the main ones

Now with Psyciatrist, that's a different matter, I would be very fearful of them and they could cause harm than good.

There is a difference between Psychologist and Psychiatrist.

Psychiatrist are medically trained, they can have a final say, they can put clients on meds, they can enforce power over a patient. They are a doctor.

Psychologist are not medically trained and cannot give meds.

They have ethical acts to follow and if these acts are not followed then these are fake Psychologists. Every country has their own procedures so please bear that in mind.

This is from UK ethics. In another country the ethics are different. Not all fits all.

It is OK to talk about fetishes, it is ok to be honest with a Psychologist. These are there to help, to know you, to understand you, it is the only way a client can understand themselves too.

What if a client had sex therapy, that's a Psychologist, what if the fetishes got too much? Or what if the client doesn't understand about the fetishes? Could suffer in silence for a very long time. With a genuine therapist it can help a great deal.

This quite weird film contains such an intrusive interview

https://vimeo.com/ondemand/officer

Throughout an important segment of it, the interviewed man is completely naked and must answer the most intimate questions - asked by a woman.

Obviously, by far not credible in any kind of real life situation.

But, when we turn reality to fantasy, everything becomes possible.

Fortunately, I would say...

Throughout an important segment of it, the interviewed man is completely naked and must answer the most intimate questions - asked by a woman.

Obviously, by far not credible in any kind of real life situation.

Indeed a wonderful fantasy situation. I would be absolutely thrilled to be intimately questioned naked. And probably by someone just like the lady in the film, with glasses. A must ... 😃

As roleplay a nice and erotic dream. In reality a horror.

I have a lot of experiance with psychologists and psychiatrists because of my biographical and biological background. The therapy didn‘t include intimate examinations of the body. But it includes until now sometimes intrusive questions and prejudice or unconscious assumptions with a certain bias. As long as they don‘t know the first part of my life everything is okay. But if they know that the first twenty years of my life were different to a normal childhood an adolescence then the psychologists and psychiatrists split up into to groups: For one group it is not a big deal and I‘m the same human being like before. But the other group is very interested in that aspect transidentity. I often feel that they are not recognizing my hole personality. They ask then very intimate questions especially about sexual topics. In reality this very annoying and often disrespectful.

It would be completely different as roleplay with a sympathic man who plays a psychologist or psychiatrist. If I can trust this man I would enjoy intimate examinations and questions. Maybe my partner asks me to put of all my clothes and lay down on a bed. I would enjoy if he touches me and palpate my abdomen. Also an examination on a gynaecological chair would be exciting for me if I feel his hands on my body or his finger inside my bowel. And if he asks me about my erotic and sexual interests and fantasy while he is touching me it would be wonderful. And if he has a very special suggestion and tells me that a very effective therapy is a real penetration I would be happy and let him and his penis take my body.

But this is just a dream.

This quite weird film contains such an intrusive interview

https://vimeo.com/ondemand/officer

Very interesting find. Thanks for sharing, @Greeg

I really like the sound of this, especially as i have some rather dark fantasies xx

I did have the honour to have been submitted to such questioning. It started quite easy about day-to-day things, went to more personal questions and was then driven into sexually oriented questions, feelings, preferences, experiences, details, etc ...

It's been quite a long time ago, but I still think about it all, especially from the position where I started and ended.

The psych also witnessed the physical I did have afterwards later that day

It was quite an experience, I have to admit :-) and is also quite interesting to be done in roleplay ...

Really makes me think, having amateurly self-analyzed for so many years… what would it be like to be questioned about my deepest desires and what’s behind them?

Scary thought but appealing.

What about this… doing the psychoanalysis DURING an exam by a play partner? OMG. And with a certain woman ‘doctor’ I know, could the therapist question us both during the exam, dig into each of our desires and hidden secrets as the other listens and participates? Best orgasm ever or biggest mistake ever? 🤔😂

@GraceT

What about this… doing the psychoanalysis DURING an exam by a play partner? OMG. And with a certain woman ‘doctor’ I know, could the therapist question us both during the exam, dig into each of our desires and hidden secrets as the other listens and participates? Best orgasm ever or biggest mistake ever? 🤔😂

That really sounds crazy as well as dangerous ...

The 'interview' I had was already scary and dangerous...just because at the start of the more and most initmate questions, you obviously try to avoid the details, reality, and real thoughts/fantasies. The good 'interviewer' stays on the topic, asks deeper and additional information and eventually gets the info you didn't like to put in the open. He/she also looks at your reactions and plays subtilly with those reactions, refers to them with seemingly loose questions. All that, just to go to their ultimate goal, to have you open and vulnerable in front of them and making you really clear that you've nowhere to go or to hide anymore ... that's how it felt for me anyway. It was then later that day extended during the physical I had.

If there is a possibility to really do that during a roleplay, it would again be really intruiging as well as pleasant and accepted 🤔

Very interesting subject indeed. Being interviewed, very thoroughly, by an officer or a therapist and being led to tell him (or her), our deepest secrets and hidden fantasies can be either very humiliating and awful or very pleasurable and exciting . As wrote@GraceT, it could be a bigger mistake ever or the most pleasurable ever done... The case depends in fact of the circumstances. If the person who interrogates you is someone you perfectly know, such as a role play partner, it can be great and highly exciting. But at the oppposite , if the circumstances are not excepted, if it is not a game but a real and official interrogatory, it may be very humiliating and a hard mental test to pass. I think that beyond the type of questions we may have to answer, it is the context that makes all the difference on our cerebral impact.

Certainly, it is something I would gladly add to the play. I would also enjoy seeing my patient blushing or hearing her voice change when answering those questions.

I've more recently gotten rather fascinated with this idea from a med-fet standpoint. One semi-fantasy of mine is, as a part of an exam, the doctor spends some time asking invasive sexual history and behavior questions. I think one way this could be fun is a "fetish/sexual activity interest questionaire" where with each play visit, the doctor has you fill out how much you've engaged in or how much interest you've had in fetishes x, y, or z. I always love reading the play exam intake forms people post every so often, and its always a big turn on to read some of the questions asked along those longs, on top of the more mundane questions (which also are fun to read!). Its stuff like that and really adds to the psychological aspects that make medical play a big turn on for me.

If your going for pure fantasy, this could be alot of fun. If you have a play exam, have a third person in the room, the psychiatrist. As the doctor proceeds through the exam the psychiatrist can ask questions about what you are thinking, what you feel in your body and record all of this. Could be a whole lot of fun. I wouldn't mind experiencing this as a patient.

I like to fantasize about questioned about my sexual activity and fantasies and feelings by a doctor/medical professional when young, with an older person present throughout the questioning, let us say the traditional older 'aunt' or family friend who accompanies me to the doctor's exam.

Such a situation has the double thrill of (reluctantly) telling sexual secrets and fantasies to both a stranger and to an acquaintance/family member.

This is quite an interesting question. Being vulnerable with the psychologist means you trust them to keep your fetishes secret and safe. I wonder if that would shift the already present power dynamic between a psychologist and patient at all.

Oh yes along with being restrained and cathed to a wheelchair or bed like a submissive psych patient!

@Trinket

... Being vulnerable with the psychologist means you trust them to keep your fetishes secret and safe. I wonder if that would shift the already present power dynamic between a psychologist and patient at all.

I can tell you that there is no question about trusting them, I didn't trust her at all, so I did try to keep in all a bit covered. It does not shift the power dynamics, at least not as I experienced and felt it. The psychologist kept the power and did have all the power. It also depends how vulnerable you are at that moment. I only was wearing my underpants (briefs) during the interview and that alone already puts the power definitely with the psychologist. She did get the information she needed, starting by filling in and suggesting certain things. Which you then admit or deny, but if you deny, you can be sure to get follow-up question on the topic, even going deeper into it ... and that's the subtile way how they do get the info they want to have. And that's as well the most intruiging part of it all, as you realise after the interview, that you have revealed almost all the secret and quite dark (sexual) fantasies and actions to her.

Fact is also that, during the physical following the interview a few hours later, the psychologist witnessed the exam and allusions and links were made to what was admitted during the interview.

@FDNM_patient

I can tell you that there is no question about trusting them, I didn't trust her at all, so I did try to keep in all a bit covered. It does not shift the power dynamics, at least not as I experienced and felt it. The psychologist kept the power and did have all the power. It also depends how vulnerable you are at that moment….

I see, that makes a lot of sense. You’ve made quite the interesting point about not picking up the kind of language used to get information until later. If the psychologist already has all of the power at the start Instead of a 50/50 split as I had envisioned, then I guess it would be really easy to spill all of your secrets. Ty for the reply!

Edit: apologies for formatting, still getting used to this site

In my world at the end of the day its all about the psychological aspect. The physical is a means to the psychological.

If one is generally mentally stable, it's all right to resent probing questions about matters one doesn't want to share.

However, if a person is hurting, or has a behavioral problem causing harm to self or others, and wants to get well or stay out of trouble, then it's important to tell the therapist everything s/he wants to know about and it's a good idea to tell about things they don't ask about. I've had depression, a suicide attempt, and subsequent hospitalization. I told her about suicide thoughts but should have called her when I really felt bad; I thought she'd put me in the hospital. That's better than dead from suicide, though. All the years of therapy were about the depression. We really didn't talk about my medical fetishes, previous child abuse. It all came out in the hospitalization.

@FDNM-patient

@Trinket I can tell you that there is no question about trusting them, I didn't trust her at all, so I did try to keep in all a bit covered. It does not shift the power dynamics, at least not as I experienced and felt it. The psychologist kept the power and did have all the power. It also depends how vulnerable you are at that moment. I only was wearing my underpants (briefs) during the interview and that alone already puts the power definitely with the psychologist. She did get the information she needed, starting by filling in and suggesting certain things. Which you then admit or deny, but if you deny, you can be sure to get follow-up question on the topic, even going deeper into it ... and that's the subtile way how they do get the info they want to have. And that's as well the most intruiging part of it all, as you realise after the interview, that you have revealed almost all the secret and quite dark (sexual) fantasies and actions to her.

Fact is also that, during the physical following the interview a few hours later, the psychologist witnessed the exam and allusions and links were made to what was admitted during the interview.

Did this happen in a real psychiatric hospital?

If that was the case, then the patient's dignity was not respected.

@Trinket I can tell you that there is no question about trusting them, I didn't trust her at all, so I did try to keep in all a bit covered. It does not shift the power dynamics, at least not as I experienced and felt it. The psychologist kept the power and did have all the power. It also depends how vulnerable you are at that moment. I only was wearing my underpants (briefs) during the interview and that alone already puts the power definitely with the psychologist. She did get the information she needed, starting by filling in and suggesting certain things. Which you then admit or deny, but if you deny, you can be sure to get follow-up question on the topic, even going deeper into it ... and that's the subtile way how they do get the info they want to have. And that's as well the most intruiging part of it all, as you realise after the interview, that you have revealed almost all the secret and quite dark (sexual) fantasies and actions to her.

Fact is also that, during the physical following the interview a few hours later, the psychologist witnessed the exam and allusions and links were made to what was admitted during the interview.

It sounds like the psychologist has a psychosis and thinks he's a forensic scientist interrogating a serious criminal. This has nothing to do with therapy but with power.