Examined by the same sex

I prefer to be examined by females, men scare me slightly.

I prefer it when a woman examines me. I have nothing against a male doctor, but I prefer a woman. When a man undresses in front of a man and undergoes an examination it is as if he gave up. I've never been examined naked by a much younger woman. I don't know how wtey he felt.

I get what the OP is saying. I’ve had bi experiences sure but my primary attraction is to men. I’m monagamous with my husband but were I ever to branch out it would probably be in the guise of a play exam by a woman play doc. That and blowing my husband with another woman. 2 chicks on one cock just turns me on, not sure why.

I've only ever been examined by the same sex, but since I'm gay, I guess my equivalent to your fetish would be an examination by the opposite sex. Gotta admit that I probably would be turned off by it. I like watching CFNM videos, but I think that's my interest in seeing the NM. I don't think being the NM in a real-life CFNM situation now that I'm in my 40s would be very interesting to me. Being the NM in a CMNM situation though is still a huge turn-on, so I can see where you're coming from.

Women are gentler is my experience.

But my first and most and only truly erotic medical exam was at age 12 while being examined by my male pediatrician. His hands were warm, soft, and gentle. Though I’m heterosexual and have only been with women, that exam remains a powerful memory.

I'm female and I'm only aroused by male doctors. Female doctors don't do anything for me at all. I suppose that has mostly to do with the fact that I always had male doctors as a kid when my fascination with being naked in front of male doctors developed.

@pdxman I don't think this is strange. Fetish vs. romantic vs. sexual partners can be different things/identities and each with their own preferences.

I for one sexually am more interested in women, but when it comes to med-fet my most enjoyable experiences have been with male play doctors, to include things like masturbation, anal stimulation, and ejaculation. Sexuality can certainly be more complicated that just who you prefer to have sex with for sure!

I think that this is a complex question. On the one hand, the prospect of being examined by a female for a straight male likely is laden with sexual preoccupation. The very fact that one is surrendering to the female and exposed in ways that reveal all is a powerful source of arousal. It doesn't take much for the penis to react to touch and touch there will be. It's only a matter of when and whether one's briefs are off or merely lowered. Surely one will avoid eye contact as she grasps our sack. Genital and likely rectal examination has to heighten one's sensitivity to respond. Responding to her commands is absolute. One doesn't want to appear sheepish. Secretly, one wants the penis to look bold and not shriveled. The fear of appearing inferior; not measuring up is huge. Alas, there is no guarantee when it is being held between her fingers. The gentle rotation of each testicle reminds you that you are at her mercy. At this point, tension merely builds. So for most of us, the embarrassment would be huge along with the inevitable spontaneous erection. Then comes the directive for your DRE to which you obey but may fantasize as her finger twists fully up your passage.

As for a male to male exam, the tables are turned. Throughout all of this, the sensitivity to touch and reaction of the penis and anus is like no other moment.

Here, the focus may be more on what is to happen. The sequence of events sets in motion a very strong psychological process, if you will, that has us wondering how much of me will he see and touch. The time spent waiting for the doctor leads to tension and likely erection activity. For some, the days preceding the exam is met with ongoing masturbation and reliving previous physicals. Once there, one is likely to ruminate about undressing as if being strategically stripped or required to show all and to do so promptly. The sudden awareness of “How will I measure up,” happens fast, and then the evidence is revealed as one lowers his underpants. The doing of this is so personal. The only question is whether to be bold and lower your briefs while facing the examiner or turn as if to shield yourself. Of course, the doctor can trump all by saying, “Toss your briefs on the chair and stand here.” There could be other variations like having to raise one’s hips and be told to lower or more importantly, remove one’s underpants. Now you are naked and there is no hiding.

I suspect for the male to male exam, there may be less thought about using a modesty sheet since, “Heck, we are all males here.”

For some, this moment is met by a gradual erection such that it engenders pride when the penis assumes the “L” position. The doctor has to navigate this with skill and gentleness. The inevitable testicular exam heightens awareness and if erect, only adds to the possibility of producing some precum. The obligatory hernia exam and the necessity to cough while his finger pushes up the inguinal canal has to garner one’s attention. It is only moments away from the snap of fresh gloves, the appearance of KY, and the directive to either turn onto one’s side or bend over the exam table. If your doc is very discipline, you could have two rectal exams given, one in each position.

Regardless of the sex of the examiner, the exam when done completely is a full on journey into becoming submissive and allowing for one’s private parts to become the focus on attention. How you react is a product of past experiences as well as fantasy thoughts and the ability to allow yourself to be “present in the moment” when it’s “Your Turn.”

I have no problem with it. In fact that is all I have ever had were female doctors. The one who delivered me and my sister and was our peds doctor and regular doctor until I moved down here. I had her find me, someone, down here that is just like her. She did and wow. I have to say that my doctor is gorgeous. I have to keep my mind off of what is about to happen. Of course, my sister and her girlfriend do not help because they always tease me. So I can relate. The first doctor retired.

I have been examined by both sexes and it was nice,sometimes wonder what it would feel like to be examined by m/f doctor at the same time,just thinking of that scenario is very arousing.

I prefer being examined by a woman physician. I've been wearing diapers and rubber pants most of the time and feel much more comfortable when a woman exams me, since she will inevitably see me with only my diapers and rubber pants on. I'm afraid a male doctor would be critical and disapproving of my wearing diapers when I don't have a medical reason for wearing them. My primary care doctor is a woman who I told some years ago that I decided to wear diapers for my own peace of mind and not because I'm incontinent. She has acted much like my mother did and has been understanding, not totally accepting that I like to wear diapers and go potty in them, but accepts my choices non the less and doesn't give me a hard time. Usually her nurse will help me take my diapers off before my doctor gives me a full exam and I have to admit I usually have erections when she unpins my diapers and removes them before I'm examined. It doesn't last for long, goes soft quickly, but I do get aroused.

I’ve never been attracted to my own sex, so during the times that I’ve been examined by a male doctor, nothing sexual ever registered. If I’m sick or injured, I only want relief. For all I care, the gender means nothing.

I have been examined by both male and female doctors. I don't really have a preference as long as who ever I am seeing is competent in what they are doing. As for the med fet aspect of it. I have found my self getting aroused by a female nurse practitioner giving me a physical and also by a male doctor giving me a physical. I don't think the gender of the doctor matters. It's the exam it's self, it's what they do to me and the way that makes me feel that arouses me. Not whether they are male or female.

When I am examined by male doctors, I do not feel any embarrassment. Although this does not suit me very much, I am more frank with them than with female doctors. As a child, I experienced great embarrassment from examinations by female doctors and imagined how easy it would be if there were male doctors in their place.

I had a male pediatrician, who I liked very much. Very kind, gentle, consistent. But the exams were always very embarrassing for me. And exciting too. I've had a few gynocologists and most have been female. Either is OK, as long as they communicate well.

For play exams, I've never been the "doctor" for a female patient, just been the patient, which is crave. Never been examined by a guy and at the moment don't have any desire to. But I like examining a certain type of guy, that is, a very submissive one.

I have always had female gynecologists. It's not that overly modest. I just want someone that is authority doing it. Unless the male has had a sex change he doesn't have one. He can't possibly know what I feel there. I mean going to a male for a vaginal examination would be like going to a dentist who was born without teeth. How in the hell would a dentist know what a toothache feels like if he. she never had teeth?

@ddell2 It's interesting because I've heard exactly the opposite opinion from a female friend of mine. She had some experiences with female gynecologists who would tell her that something does not hurt, or pass judgment on her, because, they argued, as females they knew what they were talking about. In contrast, she told me, male gynecologists avoid this.

My sister had a similar problem with a female physical education teacher. That teacher basically ordered female students to wear tampons not to skip swimming lessons. If they argued that they could not use tampons (my sister had a tight hymen and tampons hurt; I guess some girls have vaginismus), the teacher would tell them not to bullshit her, that as a female she knew what she was talking about, and so on.

These "professionals" acted insensitively according to the fallacy that since they are females, they know anything that a female can feel with their sexual organs, so if a problem did not happen to them, it cannot happen to any woman and those who claim it happened to them lie or at least exaggerate. It is as absurd as a male denying that there is such a thing as premature ejaculation because it never happened to him.

It doesn't really matter to me if I am examined by a male or a female as long as a dre is included!

For me, I prefer female doctors & pracitioners as I have found them to be more empathetic & thorough. Not always, but in general.

I have no objections to male doctors, but it seems I encounter more females in general practice.

From a medfet/arousal standpoint - female definitely. For me, it's largely about the power dynamic and role reversal.

From a play standpoint - never had a partner with any interest in medfet.

Several folks have commented on their experiences with a pediatrician as being foundational. As a kid, I never had a pediatrician. We only saw the doctor for major things like serious illness or broken bones. We'd go to the clinic for shots, but I have no memory of childhood physical exams

In the real doc world I have only had male doctors but I think I would not have a problem with a female. In the play world I would be open to giving or receiving an exam by a female but it has been all males so far.

@Pecan_nutjob My sister had a similar problem with a female physical education teacher. That teacher basically ordered female students to wear tampons not to skip swimming lessons. If they argued that they could not use tampons (my sister had a tight hymen and tampons hurt; I guess some girls have vaginismus), the teacher would tell them not to bullshit her, that as a female she knew what she was talking about, and so on.

Although I lived on the South Coast of France for a couple of years, I don't know much about your legal system. In America, if a teacher ordered someone to wear a tampon, she or he for that matter would be opening themselves to a lawsuit that the plaintiff most assuredly would win.