Ladies: do you prefer a guy that is circumcised ? Or not ?

For the ladies: do you prefer a guy that is circumcised ? or not ?

Or does it not matter ?

I've always wondered ...

Thank you,

I've had intercourse with both types of men and there is absolutely no difference. When a guy with a foreskin is erect the skin just rolls behind the glans and they are all the same at that point.

The only small difference I experience is while giving them masturbation with my hand. When the foreskin is present there is more flexibility and I find it much easier to pleasure the man.

Beth.

See this earlier post of mine:

http://www.zity.biz/index.php?mx=forum;ox=display;topic=14340;start=msg274058#msg274058

I still think that if I close my eyes, once they are inside me, I can't tell the difference.

I agree with Bethany that if I am masturbating a man without any lube, it is a little easier if they are uncut, but I like to use lots of lube--I like them really wet when I'm doing them, so the the presence of a foreskin ceases to be a positive factor for me.

I apologize beforehand if my question has been answered elsewhere or is in any fashion redundant. I searched and did not find specific commentary addressing this, if it is there please redirect me and I will with gladly reference to it. 😃

An additional question that comes to mind, I also have been curious about: If the ladies have a preference, more of the actual specifics as to why ? What is the particular attraction of one in preference to the other?

Sincerely,

G.N.

@ G.N.

Personally, i feel the circumcised penis feels and looks cleaner and is (just to me, understand) more aesthetically pleasing. i also have a personal dislike for touching the genitalia of any living thing, so i do not like having to touch something which i can not see fully without pulling back some skin. This is just all personal preference, and i probably have some complex brought on by something i was taught or accidently saw as a child, but i don't mind it at all, so i don't want to be "fixed" in this area.

To me, i feel safer having sex with a man whom i can inspect fully without really having to touch him much, because everyone knows (or should know) one of the best defenses of "catching something" (even if you use condoms) is to make sure the person LOOKS clean and unblemished. Call it paranoia if you want, but i am a fan of circumcision. Hope this answers your questions a little better, G.N.

Clear, concise and direct to the specific... very appreciated. 😃 As to some obscure paranoid childhood phobic complex? None seen or perceived here. Sounds very much like solid prudent reasoning on your behalf 😃 Responsible adult commentary such as yours is one of the reasons I come to the sites in the first place. 😃 😉

G.N.

As an uncircumcised male I can confirm that I do shower at least once everyday, sometimes more in warm weather and during visits to the gym. And each time the foreskin will be rolled fully back and everything washed thoroughly. So I guess the difference between myself and a guy who is circumcised is zero really....Unless he doesn't wash as much as me!

As for sex I find that during erections the head of my penis swells,the foreskin is stretched, and naturally rolls back behind the ridge. Everything is there for the woman to see.

However I've been sexually active for over 35 years and have never encountered a woman who didn't want to touch me...

Kind regards

Dr Philip - The UK Play Doctor.

Dr Philip, one of things I have been told by a couple of women is that they get an extra sensation, and a very pleasant one, from the friction of the peeled back foreskin against the outer walls of their vaginas. Years ago, back in the free-lovin' 60s, one girl called it, More fuck for the buck! I cannot even remember her name anymore, only her face and gorgeous ass, but I do recall that she was about three years into fucking every guy she could find. Ah, those were the days!

Thanks for your reply and to Al C. yes those were the days.

No I'm not offended or hurt at all by your comments and yes of course it is your personal preference absolutely, I support you 100% in that.

I was just trying to say that us guys are all the same really,but as so rightly observes it's the owner not the penis that is important. And even if the guy looks clean and unblemished that's no guarantee that a nasty STD like chlamydia is not lurking inside.

Hope you have a good day and weekend...

Dr Philip 😄

I really prefer circumcised

Since I am a guy, I apologize for answering a question addressed to ladies, but I prefer a circumcised penis. My preference is purely for aesthetic reasons and I am not being critical of uncircumcised men in any way. Here's what I like about circumcised penises. When the foreskin is removed, the shape of the head is more visible and this is where a lot of variation in the appearance of the individual penis exists. Even with a retracted foreskin, the sculpted profile of the head is somewhat less defined since the coronal sulcus is concealed by the rolled back foreskin. Whe the penis is circumcised, the head takes on a less shiny and rougher surface texture which I find attractive. The head also becomes more brown and less purple. Also the circumcision scar gives the penis a distinctive look. The shape, width, location, and pigmentation of the scar makes each circumcised penis unique.

I too am a male and apologize for answering a question posed to females. I thoroughly enjoy examining or fantasize about examining an uncircumcized penis, whether flacid or erect. I myself was circumcized at birth. I enjoy watching and playing with an uncircumcized penis...watching the foreskin slowly cover the meatus and beyond, then gently retracting the foreskin slowly exposing the meatus.

I am sure everyone knows my thoughts and feelings on this topic by now as I have been more than vocal about it. I for one can absolutely feel and smell the difference both inside and out. Maybe because of my OCD, but I like everything neat and clean so to speak. If it's a nail I want it flush with the surface it's on, if it's a picture I want it strait, and if it's a penis, I want it trimmed up and neat looking with clean defined lines. The floppy skin needs to go.......with all due respect.

Mashie

Women have a right to choose, of course. Coke or Pepsi? Cut or uncut? That's fine, and whether it's barbaric to mutilate trusting children is a whole other topic! I'm uncut, obviously, but I've yet to get a single complaint and women always come back for more... Without exception!

Women don't sit around looking at, and I don't obsess on the looks or smell of their vagina. Neither are too pretty or neat, and so what?

Anyways, if I was to get a complaint, she'd better NOT have a Blown Out vagina!!! Oh noooo...

Im circumcised and my girlfriend says she likes it better that way

I am curious if others have noticed an increase in the percentage of uncircumcised men under 30 years old in the U.S.? I see a lot of penises at the gym and in public restrooms and, until the past couple of years would almost never see one that was not circumcised. Now it seems like maybe 20% or so of younger guys are uncircumcised.

I am curious if others have noticed an increase in the percentage of uncircumcised men under 30 years old in the U.S.? I see a lot of penises at the gym and in public restrooms and, until the past couple of years would almost never see one that was not circumcised. Now it seems like maybe 20% or so of younger guys are uncircumcised.

But isnt that a correct development? Guys need to make the decision by themselves, whether or not they want to get circumcised. That's not a decision for their parents to make.

I think much of people's preferences have to do with socialization. If you grew up in a community where circumcision is the 'norm,' that's probably going to be your preference. If you grew up where circumcision was the exception, that would be your preference. I was born both Jewish and at a time and in an area where circumcision was expected. All my friends, Jewish or not, were cut. I would have loved to experience having a foreskin.

When my X and I were pregnant, we planned NOT to circumcise our baby, it was a girl. My belief is that it's incredibly arrogant to think we can improve on natural selection.

I much prefer an uncircumcised one both for the look and the feel.

I think much of people's preferences have to do with socialization. If you grew up in a community where circumcision is the 'norm,' that's probably going to be your preference.

When my X and I were pregnant, we planned NOT to circumcise our baby, it was a girl. My belief is that it's incredibly arrogant to think we can improve on natural selection.

So it looks like you've bucked the socialization process in spite of the norms imposed by social pressure ... I'd say that as education improves and more and more people are taught and encouraged to think for themselves on social/ethical questions, then the influence of social pressure will decrease in these kind of situations.

So it looks like you've bucked the socialization process in spite of the norms imposed by social pressure ... I'd say that as education improves and more and more people are taught and encouraged to think for themselves on social/ethical questions, then the influence of social pressure will decrease in these kind of situations.

I would have bucked the norm if my baby had been a boy. I wouldn't have hesitated to circumcise my kid for health reasons if there was a medical problem. I don't deny that modern medicine can fix some of nature's mistakes, I just don't try to out think nature.

I don't deny that modern medicine can fix some of nature's mistakes, I just don't try to out think nature.

Out thinking Nature used to be quite popular in some medical circles in the past - remember when it was proposed to routinely remove tonsils at birth so as to avoid future tonsillectomies? Or when the same was proposed for the appendix? Undoubtedly there was a financial element in all of these and similar proposals - just imagine the number of procedures doctors could carry out at birth and the remuneration - but even aside from that, I think many doctors were convinced it was the right path to take ...

But what when it turns out that these things are not Nature's mistakes at all, but that doctors just don't know everything about human bodies yet?

In the US, it's used to be common to perform an appendectomy routinely whenever possible during abdomenal surgery. I think that the only reason they stopped was that managed care wouldn't pay to excise healthy organs.

I think circumcision is medically unnecessary. I just love the look of the circumcised penis and I think the fact that it is unnecessary makes it hot.

I think circumcision is medically unnecessary. I just love the look of the circumcised penis and I think the fact that it is unnecessary makes it hot.

I would have loved the choice. I also would have loved the experience. I had neither.

Having been socialized in a predominantly circumcised community, I find the cut penis more aesthetically pleasing. The uncut penis looks unusual. I'm fascinated by its function. I love playing with intact men for that reason. Also, being into CBT, there's more to torment.

In other threads, members often talk about anxiety and humiliation being partially at the root of having a medical fetish(es). I've found that being uncircumcised when young, but having the possibility of an enforced circumcision permanently dangling above your head, sort of like a sword or scalpel of Damocles, certainly causes anxiety and lots of worry about the procedure ever being carried out.

In the end, I grew up without it being forced on me, but the possibility was always there. And now, much older and of course free in what I do or not medically, I cannot help but find circumcision fantasy and imagining to also be a turn on. If ever I get up the courage to go to a play doc for instance, I'd think that something like an extensive foreskin examination with discussions about the unfortunate necessity of getting circumcised would be part of the play ... that would be a sort of re-enactment of the anxiety and embarrassment associated with the procedure ...

I wouldn't look upon a possible medical circumcision any differently than the possibility of an appendectomy or tonsillectomy, other surgeries that are scary but have high rates of safe outcomes.

So, is embarrassment due to being uncircumcised at the root of medical fetish?

So, is embarrassment due to being uncircumcised at the root of medical fetish?

Not for me. For me, it's the thrill of loss of control.

So, is embarrassment due to being uncircumcised at the root of medical fetish?

I might say that the ever present 'threat' and the recurring discussions more than likely played a role for me. I didn't care a proverbial rat's derriere how other boys were, cut or not. I just wanted to be left alone, as I was.

It's not because of a fear of surgery as such - cause even pre-teens know that circumcision poses virtually no medical risk at all. But rather because the idea of someone cutting off part of your privates just doesn't go over very well, what with the exposure, the big fuss about your privates, the attention lavished on them, the silly and humiliating jokes and comments (oops - a slip of the scalpel - we'll have to buy him dresses from now on ...) and also the exaggerated dire predictions about what happens to uncut organs (they invariably get infected and end up amputated of course!) ... tell me all of that isn't enough to raise one's anxiety level ... ha ha.

Of course other people had different anxieties ... but this was mine when I was young ... and I'm sure it contributed to my later fascination with medical things and developing medfet ...