My wife trims me, usually once a week. Sometimes two. It's a simple procedure and she quite enjoys doing it.
Likewise, I do all her pubic hair maintenance. She has a natural style, and all I generally need to do is narrow it slightly at the front – just so that no hair shows outside the line of her thongs and swimwear. Apart from that, she has hair front to back, where it tapers to a point above her anus. I've always liked this 1980s style and it really suits her, especially as her pubic hair is dark, quite thick, not too coarse, and the direction of growth is inward towards the centre line and curving down. She looks very beautiful like this.
Very occasionally, and just for a change, she might ask me to shave her pussy completely or shape a precisely defined landing strip, while leaving her anal area completely alone. If I shave her this extensively, I treat her skin to some of her favourite moisturiser afterwards. After a few days, she always wants everything to be allowed to grow back. Actually it has been a long time since she has had anything but her natural look.
I really don't know why people continue to believe the myth that shaving is cleaner. It just isn't. Worried about bacteria? Have a wash then. Simple really.
Having no pubic hair means there is no pheromone trap. The pheromones I mention are not dirt, but are the body's natural secretions that will have an attracting effect sexually. A kind of natural, subtle scent that works at a subconscious level. Why the hell do women want to be without this aspect of their natural sexual power, while drowning themselves in artificial perfumes which actually aren't as effective? I've said it before, but I think people who buy into the whole shaving thing, especially the men who have been conditioned to like it, are missing out on something.
Actually I think the commercial industry surrounding shaving helps perpetuate these myths and attitudes in order to sell more products.