[quote author=docshelper010 link=topic=28366.msg268922#msg268922 date=1263319613]
First, it would have a non-toxic, non-murcury fill media, such as Gallistan. Most of the controversy surrounding glass thermometers is the toxic mercury content, which is fine, until it is broken. Current Gallistan thermometers take at least four minutes to register, in contrast to at most three minutes to register for a mercury fill thermometer.
[/quote]
Totally agree....I broke a mercury one earlier today (on a counter, not in me), and cleaning it up sucked.....
[quote author=docshelper010 link=topic=28366.msg268922#msg268922 date=1263319613]5.5 inches long with a uniform thickness[/quote]
I like a little bit of length, but it's thickness that gets me....I like NICE and thick...slows reaction time as well π.
[quote author=docshelper010 link=topic=28366.msg268922#msg268922 date=1263319613]Fahrenheit scale only[/quote]
Hey! Why are we hating on the metric system? I record all temps in metric because: 1) many medical places are switching to it, 2) I'm a science/engineering guy and 3) it's actually a better system....
[quote author=docshelper010 link=topic=28366.msg268922#msg268922 date=1263319613]
Of course, a rectal temperature should only be taken for those subjects that are considered not suitable for an oral temperature.
[/quote]
Yes, but my (play) patients require an accurate reading, so I'm afraid oral temps are ruled out for all of them........