Foreskin stretching back

I was born in Europe but now reside in the US. As such, I had physical exams performed by medical practitioners in Europe and in the US.

In the US, the doctors that examined me always retracted my foreskin very aggressively, in a swift motion, and with no advance warning.

I can understand that this might be agreeable in a certain way during a play exam, as part of a dominance/punishment thing ... a stern, aloof and disapproving manner in a play situation can certainly be fun and part of what makes the play attractive in the first place.

But in real life? I just can't help but ponder that there is something personally disapproving if doctors proceed in this manner. It seems to me to be showing their personal preferences just a bit too openly.

Imagine how a female would react to having a speculum being very aggressively inserted during an exam, or anyone having a spatula stuck into the mouth or an otoscope into the ear ... I don't think anyone would appreciate any of that during a real exam.

I just can't help but ponder that there is something personally disapproving if doctors proceed in this manner. It seems to me to be showing their personal preferences just a bit too openly.

Well, I do not really think you should make any effort understanding it. I described my personal experiences when my foreskin was examined by the US doctors. That is how they were trained, that is how they do it. Remember, that the majority of males in the US lack that flap of skin that is so common in Europe. This could be another reason.

I like retracting my own forskin back as far as it will go and hold it there for a while , i like the sensation of the forskin sliding down my shaft, exposing my shiney glands head.

I described my personal experiences when my foreskin was examined by the US doctors. That is how they were trained, that is how they do it.

It's interesting and good that you describe your experiences. And comparing this to other accounts I've read both on-line as well as in published literature, it sounds spot-on for many American doctors.

And perhaps some doctors in the US are trained like that. But then I'd ask, why in the world would anyone be trained in this manner? What kind of service is this to the patient? If any doctor did that to me, I'd interpret their manner as being disapproving, certainly disrespectful and unprofessional and uncaring. I just can't get around the impression that this is a way of signalling that the doctor thinks there is something wrong or disapproving, that he thinks it is high time to get circumcised.

And since circumcision is either a religious obligation or a social custom or perhaps even a sexual fashion choice, what concern should any of these be to a medical professional? What if a doctor acted in this manner if you had a beard or mustache for instance ...

I really enjoy having my foreskin pulled back and wish that I'd be circumcised. It's provided me with some good entertainment and my frenulum has been pierced on a couple of occasions. The first piercing grew so large that the frenulum over the top snapped in the shower one morning which now allows me to pull my foreskin back even further. The only down side of this is that I've been left with a small amount of frenulum attached to the end of my glans.

If you're interested, I can tell you how to bloodlessly remove it.

As a child i had d tight foreskin and when ever i had my doc visit he made sure to strech my foreskin and expose the glans as much as possible.

had a penile cyst operation 3 mnths back and then i had to be naked and my foreskin pulled back almos all the time.

i like the feeling of foreskin rolling back on my shaft and now i can pull it down to the end.

i love to be NAKED at doctor's office.

I certainly love pulling back the foreskin very tight (or having it pulled back for me!). It seems to heighten the sensitivity of the glans when everything is stretched tight like that. I'm not sure I would advocate jerking it back tight - that could do some damage, but slowly retracting it as tightly as possible is great.

I love to pull my foreskin right back, hold my cock at the base then smear my helmet with toothpaste it stings but it makes my

orgasm so much more intense and i seem to cum more as well.

In my teenaged time, the paediatrician did a kind of stretching treatment of my foreskin because I had a light form of phimosis and my mom did not want to have a circumcision on me.

I'm uncut. Perhaps it's obvious, but being well lubricated can minimize and pain (and increase the pleasure).

When I was a young boy, during every physical my foreskin was stretched back. First times it is very painfull, forcing back the prepuce with both thumbs with a firm grip. Other times retraction is so massive that the skin seems as tearing and the frenulum was so highly stretched that glans appears bending ahead. During those deep retractions any further touch or slight pressure required by the examination itself resulted inevitably in an embarassing sexual stimulation. Sometimes the doctor explained how an eventual circumcision operation would be performed on my penis taking more time than I would in that part of the physical. This often determined slight erections and wetness appearing on the meatus which showed an initial arousal making him stop any further manual contact. It was very humiliating. But now after many years, I remember with excitation those moments.

cockney rebel said:

i love to pull my foreskin right back, hold my cock at the base then smear my helmet with toothpaste it stings

but it makes my orgasm so much more intense and i seem to cum more as well.

My first girlfriend loved to play doctors and always retracted my foreskin. Sometimes she would stretch the skin tight and swab my glans and inner foreskin with Dettol. The sting was very intense, almost painful at first. I loved it!

I would love that to be done to me during an exam by a strict female doctor

It seems to me that all males born in the U.S. from the 1940's on, have a circ. automatically. I am glad that I was included. I think that all Ped's and F.P. Dr.'s do this when they do a newborn baby check, without asking the mother.

It seems to me that all males born in the U.S. from the 1940's on, have a circ. automatically. I am glad that I was included. I think that all Ped's and F.P. Dr.'s do this when they do a newborn baby check, without asking the mother.

That certainly happened to my younger brother who was born in the US. My Belgian mother was adamantly set against circumcision. When my brother was born in the late 1950s, despite my mother requesting/demanding/asking that he not be circumcised, it was done anyway. Why would an American doctor of those years listen to the wishes of a European mother? Apparently they didn't. And there is no way to make good or correct an unwanted circumcision.

And while I have no idea what my brother thought or thinks, my mother still brought up the topic now and then until she was in her 80s. Mainly I would think, because of the doctors blatant disregard for her wishes. As if they knew everything better. It still rankled with her after all those decades.

And I don't blame her. It was a combined arrogance of doctors knowing better than lay people and better than non-Americans.

A cousin of mine had that done by his mother on doctor's advice, to resolve phimosis. Since it was not effective, she had him circumcised.

There is no way in the world a circumcision on a new born would be done without having the parents sign a consent. It's after all a surgical procedure.

There is no way in the world a circumcision on a new born would be done without having the parents sign a consent. It's after all a surgical procedure.

We're talking 1950s and a non US mother. In just about every country, non citizens and immigrants are treated with less regard and differences of opinions or customs are usually settled to the advantage of the customs of the host country.

Perhaps the hospital had an all-in procedure for births that 'naturally' at that time included routine circumcision as normal. Perhaps it was even mentioned in the release forms that few read in their entirety anyway. Perhaps no one bothered to make any changes to the release forms or whatever paperwork was required. Perhaps it was the natural and unquestioned assumption back in the 1950s that male babies were always of course circumcised, with no doubt about the matter. Perhaps no one cared about the wishes of a foreign mother.

In any case, I heard about this from my teens till my 60s and it was not something my mother ever forgot.

If you've never been an immigrant or foreigner living in another country, it's difficult to understand how often they are treated as being slightly under par on so many levels, how little is often taken into account of their wishes. Nor is it only because of language difficulties either, because my mother could pass for a native speaker, as her father grew up in Great Britain and taught her (and me) English.

I've been sometimes treated as a foreigner in the US, then afterwards as an American in Belgium and now as a northerner in Spain ... once it starts it never seems to end ... there is always something you're doing wrong ... ha ha.

So I'm pretty certain that as Jimmyt44 remarked, he was not far off the mark.

I can't comment on past times but it would not happen now without a consent being signed. And I'm glad I was circumcised too but of course you know that!

I believe that most new moms were given forms to sign and the phrase, "of course you'll want him circumcised". was verbally said to the mother. Unless it's a Jewish family, where it is expected that the newborn male will be snipped by a Rabbi, as part of a religious ceremony sometime after birth. Since I am not Jewish, I don't know how this happens.

For you Docs on Zity, is the mother asked if she wants the new male to be circ'ed, or is it assumed and she is given the forms to signed?

JT

Hospitals and doctors are so sensitive now that it is not presented or spun in any way. Unless the parents want it done it isn't. The thought is to make the infant like his father so no one feels uncomfortable.

The thought is to make the infant like his father so no one feels uncomfortable.

Uncomfortable?

People are uncomfortable around each other, in the main, because of character incompatibilities, because of how they (irrationally) act and about the things they say to each other or because of power dynamics in a family.

I find it unlikely that performing a circumcision or not will in any way effect someone's comfort level, unless perhaps that of domineering and controlling fathers. Those are the type of people who have to have everything their way. Even something that practically no one will ever see anyway. It's not as if the neighbors will be able to admire the likeness between father and son in this regard ... ha ha.

I'm just quoting the pediatric literature. Frankly I could care less about whether someone is circumcised or not. It's an individual decision.

With regard to Reply #56 by jimmyt44

It seems to me that all males born in the U.S. from the 1940's on, have a circ. automatically. I am glad that I was included. I think that all Ped's and F.P. Dr.'s do this when they do a newborn baby check, without asking the mother.

That is not true that all males born in the 1940s on were automatically circumcised. My brother was born in the 1930s at home and he was. I was born in the 1940s in a hospital and was not circumcised, thank goodness. My dad was not circumcised either so why they did my brother I don't know, but I am very glad I was not. Even today at my age my penis is much more sensitive since it didn't spend 60+ years rubbing against rough material of clothing every hour of the day and night, which toughens the skin on the head of the penis. Then there is the fact that when masturbating, you don't need any extra lubrication from a tube or a bottle as the pre-cum serves quite nicely to keep the foreskin well lubricated until orgasm. So there is much less mess to clean up afterward. I never has any male children, but if I had they would not have been circumcised and may God help the doctor who did it anyway to one of my sons. God put the foreskin on males for a reason and that's good enough reason for me to leave it there.

I needed to have my foreskin stretched as a boy due to a tight foreskin. It was not always very pleasant since the foreskin had to be under pressure and it didn't feel very comfortable, sometimes even painful. Also I found it rather humiliating as my penis was erect for the stretching exercises. But I understood it needed to be. Today I am happy that it worked and I kept my foreskin.

I love having my foreskin pulled back by a doctor and examined, but it has never been done too violently...but I do love it...when I was a kid i was embarrassed by my foreskin, but now i am so happy I have one and so proud of it--it contains the most sensitive parts of my penis!!

When I get full physicals most docs either fully retract my foreskin or they ask me to retract it. If I do the retraction it usually moves forward a small way when I take away my hand so often the doc will then pull it fully back again as part of his exam. It has always been done gently and has never caused me pain.

I don't like the feeling its going to rip

I loved the feeling too of pulling the foreskin firmly backwards. It gave a nice tingling sensation and a rock hard erection. Since I'm circumcised I didn't try it anymore. I kinda forgot about it. Interesting to add to the next playtime ?