Test of will for girls

The summary description of this entertaining experiment of will and concentration of a girl, who must demonstrate her tenacity and mental capacity, before sexual games.

The test is done to verify that the girl is able to maintain impeccable physical behavior, without sexual arousal.

Obviously, it's a perfidious and insidious test, because the girl, from the start, already knows that, later, the game that will follow will make her experience some orgasms. This is the beauty of it, because the result is already almost obvious from the start, therefore pleasant punishments can be foreseen in case of failure of the test.

Required for the test: books or

The test is very simple: after questioning her sexual preferences, he strips her completely and she stands on the carpet. At that point we start by reading some erotic text that deals with the topic, or we invent something inherent to her preference and we start the narration, even with some specific questions.

I have enough imagination, so I prefer to invent something new, even if I have a well-stocked library. :-)

After about ten minutes, she is told that she must separate her legs a little, still remaining standing, and that she must push her pelvis forward, because I will sit down in front of her, to take a good, close look at her vulva, so she will have to push the mount of Venus well out.

I'm mean, I know, because I exploit the exhibitionistic part of the girl, that she definitely gets turned on, if she already isn't.

Few minutes of "observation", while she remains in that position, with her legs apart and her pubis well out, showing almost all of her vulva well, then I expressly tell her that I will swipe the spoon a couple of times from her perineum, until the clitoris, passing it well over the vaginal vestibule and between the small lips, because I want to see if it collects any fluid...

Many, at this point, already show their delicious juice, which has run down to mid-thigh...

Test failed.

Sorry for the bad translation, but Google is to blame...

So, you find girls who volunteer for this?? Or this a fantasy??

The summary description of a test of will and concentration of a girl, who must demonstrate her tenacity and mental capacity, before sexual games.

What sexual games follow this test??

I failed just by reading the instructions!!!

You're in for a shocker mate. I would pee in your face and have a good laugh then walk off soon as you put your nose in my box. Test failed.

If a bloke wants to play with me he has to be a man.

Wow

@charles70 Your statement of a test before sexual games, concentration, tenacity and mental capacity is a bit of a conflict. Since it is a so called test before sexual games, doesn't this setup the test as a sexual game since the very subject of the test is sexual to start with? I personally would be more worried if she passed the test than failed the test as in failing the test to me is a good sign that the person enjoying the experience. The person who passes could be thinking that they are bored, not into you and thinking how can I get out of this situation and leave.

I can think of better games that I have actually done that focus on following instructions, obeying orders, and discovering what turns them on by exploring various parts of the body. Knowing what turns someone on and what doesn't helps me to plan for what happens next to make it enjoyable to both.

@Rigel

This "test" is in itself a game that is a prelude to much more extensive games.

The girls who lend themselves to playing with me are, of course, those with whom I have a certain amount of acquaintances or who agree to try some different experience after an acquaintance.

@Secret_sub I failed just by reading the instructions!

What sweet and spontaneous sensitivity...

Lovable from every point of view.

For this public admission, I could avoid punishing you... BUT I assure you that the punishment would be the best and, perhaps, you would be unhappy, without the punishment. :-)

@Bad_Princess

Well, when you peed on my face, you passed liquids, so you failed the test in the first place.

In any case, it wouldn't be bad either. I'm not a fan of peeing on my face, but it would still be nice to see.

You definitely wouldn't walk away, because, before taking this test, you would have already enjoyed other opportunities for good sex.

This is a test that comes when you know how to play. 😃

@Master_Dorson

I personally would be more worried if she passed the test than failed the test as in failing the test to me is a good sign that the person enjoying the experience.

Indeed, this is a game, of course.

It's not hard to understand the irony of the initial post. Also, being a prelude to later games, failure is almost certain.

Also, right in the test, the stage of "learning" about the girl's sexual fantasies is included, that she answers her questions ...

Even if, in any case, they are rhetorical questions, because although it would be nice for the girl to be there for the first time, this is not in reality.

She's already known before.

@charles70 I would walk away for no other reason but to deprive you of any possible pleasure. I get off on that. If we had played before and I enjoyed it I must have worn a strap-on.

@charles70,

You definitely have a lot to learn about women and BDSM. You have received some very good advice from members here.

Rolling my eyes, shaking my head and walking away…

@Fawkes

I'm sorry, but I usually only interact with people who know how to grasp irony, especially where it is evident...

Instead of making hasty judgments, without knowing who you are dealing with, you could make constructive criticisms, such as saying what you don't like, motivating the content.

If not, nobody's holding you back, you're free toto roll your eyes (watch out for Coriolis syndrome), turn on your heels and walk away :-)

Many kisses!

@Bad_Princess

I would walk away for no other reason but to deprive you of any possible pleasure. I get off on that. If we had played before and I enjoyed it I must have worn a strap-on.

hahahaha you are tough!

Those are not my pleasures, unless there is another woman with us, on whom you could use the strap-on.

You can't be perfect.

De gustibus non est disputandum.

@Fawkes 😀😀😀😀

Your opinion is valid and constructive Opinions differ. I doubt rolling your eyes will make you nauseated or disoriented or give you vertigo.

@charles70 To each their own.

I've read this. Thought about it. And have come to the conclusion that your test is invalid from the very beginning and is always doomed to fail. Your ultimate goal is for failure. Your scientific methodology is flawed and incomplete.

And your test is not even necessary if you did your due diligence in the first place by doing a proper interview to see if your subject should even be ‘tested’.

But I also infer from this that you live within your own delusional world. So, please continue to reside there and enjoy your privacy and the rest of us will move forward.

Thank you for participating in my test. Your results will be forwarded to you.

And one of my favorite quotes, paraphrased.. “move along, these aren't the submissives you're looking for.”

Have a lovely evening

Your scientific methodology is flawed and incomplete.

It is a (sexual) game and therefore intended in one way or another to be fun. So why care about scientific methodology?

Not according to the text. The test(s) are before the sexual games. And he layed out his instructions on how to advance. Therefore there is the method provided.

In my humble opinion, naturally.

It has been my normal reaction to refuse those absolutes that our author has made. When trying to impress an academic with how brilliant the plan to create failure.

Now see what you have done @agracier you've made me go and use big words. You know I prefer swearing.

(Okay for those who do not understand sarcasm…this is an excellent example, even if I do say so myself. And my whole time here has been completely tongue in cheek. ((Not between cheeks)))

@Faith

I've read this. Thought about it. And have come to the conclusion that your test is invalid from the very beginning and is always doomed to fail. Your ultimate goal is for failure. Your scientific methodology is flawed and incomplete.

But it is a sexual PLAY test. :-) :-)

And it's really a test doomed to fail.

As I have already answered to others, it is clear that this test is carried out with people who you already know...

Is it ever possible that in this forum we should always point out things, facts, arguments, as if we were at a medical congress? Sometimes it seems to me that psychiatrists have to intervene, to evaluate the arguments and the answers, which are particularly interesting because, until proven otherwise, everyone should be here for fun, more than anything else. That there are also topics that are treated seriously is another thing, but, in principle, it should be fun. Secondly, dear Faith, I'm not looking for any submissives here. If there is I can even chat and maybe meet her, but I don't see why showing an arrogance that is not just, but very, out of place.

Then, maybe, it's my fault that I didn't translate or correctly interpret your motivations.

There are those of us that have taken courses in logic and sciences, some have learned how to analyze things. What Faith basically pointed out that the test is no test since the intended purpose is failure and there is really nothing to prove if the test is designed for failure.

From both science and logic, it serves no purpose. So now you think I am raining on your parade, no what I am saying is you need to rewrite your premise with the correct intent. As someone who is an experienced dominate the tests I do is with not the intent of failure but the intent is to discover how the other person responds as a person incharge. I have a responsibility to ensure safety and to make things fun for everyone.

I believe the only issue here in the original post is a use of wrong words by someone who's first language is not English. Personally, as a non native English speaker myself, I choose to ignore this and answer to the spirit of the post rather than the literary meaning of the words used. @charles70 don't get discourage and continue to post as I am sure I would not be able to express myself as clearly in Italian as you do in English. Xx

I believe the only issue here in the original post is a use of wrong words by someone who's first language is not English. Personally, as a non native English speaker myself, I choose to ignore this and answer to the spirit of the post rather than the literary meaning of the words used.

Indeed, quite correct.

In the original post, it was already stated that the text in English was the result of a Google translation. And everyone knows how correct such translations are.

I believe the only issue here in the original post is a use of wrong words by someone who's first language is not English. Personally, as a non native English speaker myself, I choose to ignore this and answer to the spirit of the post rather than the literary meaning of the words used.

The highlighted part of that sentence is definitely not correct, is it? What does the word “who's” refer to? It doesn't make sense.

@Andrew_Finklehouse Thank you for pointing out my mistake. It refers to the original poster as HIS first language is not English.

Hope your Flemish is as good as my English and your Italian as good as the English of the original poster.

But as you are feeling it necessary to point out my error, please correct my English instead of just criticising it . So DO feel free to retype it including your correction

The summary description of a test of will and concentration of a girl, who must demonstrate her tenacity and mental capacity, before sexual games.

The test is done to verify that the girl is able to maintain impeccable physical behavior, without sexual arousal.

As others mentioned, english is not his native language, so digging into his words are difficult. I would like to reword part of the statement (if I may).

"The summary description of this entertaining experiment of will and ….

Just my two cents.

The highlighted part of that sentence is definitely not correct, is it? What does the word “who's” refer to? It doesn't make sense.

For goodness sake. There is no need to be so nitpicking. The word obviously should have been ‘whose’, but I suspect/hope you've heard of auto-corrects going all quirky and weird. It wouldn't be the first time we get a ‘your’ instead of a 'you're' and not notice it.

It's best to be charitable when coming upon typos or mistakes such as this. Especially when it is so easy to divine the original intent.

I suspect/hope you've heard of auto-corrects going all quirky and weird.

If my auto “correct” goes quirky and weird I correct it myself. How can anybody not notice something that is so frightfully hideous anyway? I wouldn't call it “nit-picking”.

The word should have been "whose", and there is no need to derail the thread.

Let us get back on-topic please instead of arguing over a simple error.

@DanMichMan ….I would like to reword part of the statement (if I may). "The summary description of this entertaining experiment of will and ….

Just my two cents.

Thanks, great tip.

I proceeded to modify the text in this sense.

Unfortunately, the Italian language has a lot of nuances that can't always be translated properly, especially in their sense of irony, or in their completeness, especially in the references to various subjects and complements, as well as the use of the consecutio temporum , in sentences in which the events and subjects must have (and actually have) their own sense of narrative and fluency in the original language, which are omitted or ignored in machine translation. I will try to use a simpler writing in the next narratives.