Forced retractions attempts?

Who here has been subjected to forced retractions of the foreskin? When I was growing up, these were the last resort before sending the boy to a “little surgery”!

I have,but when the foreskin went back it was a job to get it back over my helmet and my helmet was very sensitive,after a few attempts it went back over and i never had no trouble retracting it again.

@biman2 Who did it?

@biman2 Who did it?

i did

Fortunately, I didn't have a full exam until I was 18. By then I was naturally retractable. Before my mid-teens, my foreskin didn't retract. In the US where I was, I probably would have been forcibly retracted by a doctor, or worse.

I was constantly exposed to foreskin by my parents as a child until I was able to pull it all the way through.

During the genital examination my pediatrician did the forced prepuce retraction. He started with a gentle stretching but before puberty he dilated the prepuce with instruments obtaining a fully exposed glans. He did a forced retraction for all examination untill I finished to go to him, he retracted the prepuce very deeply, the glans was bending and I remember my frenulum pulling painfully. In a few occasion after the retraction he applied a cream directly to the glans and the touch was in between a tickling and painful sensation.

Yes I was. I had a medical when I was around 7 where the doctor retracted my foreskin, and suggested it was too tight and that I needed circumcising. My mother took me to my GP for a second opinion, he examined me and said I maynot need circumcising if my foreskin was stretched. My mother did this after baths. My foreskin was always retracted in school medicals.

I have not. My foreskin could fully retract before a doctor ever tried to retract it. But I know one of my cousins experienced this at the doctor when he was 9 or 10 years old. (edited to fix spelling)

Yes I remember well the failed and very painful attempts but my mother and subsequently a Dr to retract my foreskin. I have described the resulting surgery in previous posts. I do sometimes wonder however if it had been left alone whether retraction would have happened naturally when a bit older? I strongly suspect not.

I have posted on another thread about my experience as I was subjected to forced foreskin retraction during my first ever school medical.

I had no idea before hand what was going to happen during the medical but at one point I was told that the doctor had to see me with without my underwear on.

Without saying anything, as soon as my pants were down the doctor proceeded to give my genitals a thorough exam. She tried to retract my foreskin but I was very tight and could not expose any part of my glans. This was very embarrassing as rather than it being a quick look I was standing for ages while the doctor manipulated my penis and discussed the phimosis with my parent.

Afterwards, I had to go to the family GP to discuss a circumcision. The school doctor would have had me cut straight away but our own doctor said to leave it a while and try to loosen it over time. From then on, every night I had to sit on the edge of the bed, rub some cream on the end of my penis and show how far my foreskin would pull back. I took a long time but eventually it managed to get it all the way back.

I was about as close as you can get to getting cut but years on and my skin couldn't slide back any easier.

When my pediatrician discovered my phimosis tried to forcefully retract my foreskin. He initially used creams to aid the retraction but was unsuccessful. After that he inserted hemostats between foreskin and glan to remove the adhesions, this procedure was very painful but it wasn't possible to fully expose the glan. After repeating the procedure several times without full success he sent me to the hospital for the circumcision.

How do they do a circumcision if the foreskin is adhered to the glans? Do they just rip it off the glans and if so why would it still be necessary? The poor boy would be left with not only the sore cut but a very sore bare glans now rubbing on everything.

@JP1 This shows how such decisions depend on which physician provides the opinion, some will advocate surgery right away, some will say this can wait and why don't you try to ease it gently… So this school physican was with your mother? father? attending?

@roscoe Indeed, during circumcision adhesions between the glans and the foreskin are undone. I think it's easier to do it during circumcision rather than as a standalone procedure because the physician does not have to preserve the skin and it's done under anesthesia anyway. I think they run a tool between glans and foreskin.

And indeed, after circumcision the boy has a sore bare glans, thus the bandages, and, in some cases, application of Vaseline until things have settled down.

I have written several posts on this site about my forced foreskin retraction over a period of years from being about 5 - 7 years of age by two older girls.

It was done in a playful manner, as in playing “ Dr’s & Nurses”. Essentialy the naturally fused inner foreskin which was attached to the glans corona, was pulled away by one girl in particular.

These episodes of submitting myself for her to do these things to my penis, have left an indelible scar on me and has certainly created my ongoing fetish for having my foreskin forced back tight and painfully to this day.

How do they do a circumcision if the foreskin is adhered to the glans? Do they just rip it off the glans and if so why would it still be necessary? The poor boy would be left with not only the sore cut but a very sore bare glans now rubbing on everything.

Generally, when circumcision is performed in infancy, the prepuce needs to be separated from the glans before a clamp is attached. The doctor clears the adhesions by pulling the prepuce up and inserting a blunt instrument between the glans and the prepuce. Then, the instrument is moved around the glans inside of the prepuce before it is fully retracted. Then, the clamp is attached, and the prepuce is removed.

The operation is quick, safe, and simple. Parents often request their newborn sons to be circumcised because the procedure has significant preventive and hygienic benefits. Decades ago, it was often performed on US-born male without a parental consent.

The doctor clears the adhesions by pulling the prepuce up and inserting a blunt instrument between the glans and the prepuce. Then, the instrument is moved around the glans inside of the prepuce before it is fully retracted. Then, the clamp is attached, and the prepuce is removed.

Why not describe the procedure as it is: an instrument is forceably pushed between foreskin and glans which essentially cuts/tears open the natural adhesions between the two. Then the foreskin is cut away.

Why not describe the procedure as it is: an instrument is forceably pushed between foreskin and glans which essentially cuts/tears open the natural adhesions between the two. Then the foreskin is cut away.

I would prefer to see the adhesion being focibly separated by hand, using the thumbs. Once the foreskin is fully retracted, a thumb being placed onto the glans and the other placed firmly onto the stretched shaft skin beneath the corona, so the skin can be peeled away.

This is what happened to me when young, although my penis was erect at the time when I had mine forced back by the girls.

Yes i got the forced retractions of my foreskin when i was 7 years old.

It like a torture for à little boy and must be illégal to do That. It very very very painfull.

This very likely was my fate as a young child, before I had many memories. My mom was a stickler for hygiene, and I was left uncut because I was born very prematurely. I've written a number of posts saying that had I been carried to normal term, there is zero doubt I would have been circumcised, given the prevalent medical advice in the USA at the time. This is despite my parents emigrating from a decidedly non-cutting culture! Following that advice, subsequently, also meant that there would have been efforts made to make sure I was retractable and cleaned underneath at diaper changes, etc.

As such, my penis had a quite retractable foreskin at a young age. The entire glans could be revealed when flaccid, at ages 4-5, the earliest I can recall anything dealing with my genitals. I do remember my mother making sure in no uncertain terms I washed underneath my foreskin in the bath/shower, to the point of her checking by gently squeezing my glans to make sure nothing came out of the meatus. (On the other hand, my dad, who is either cut really loosely or has an extremely short foreskin, just said that being clean underneath was all that was necessary and sufficient.) Through childhood, my mom was concerned that I had too much foreskin and extended an offer to pay for circumcision should I decide to undergo it, because it was more hygienic and very likely more preferred among female partners in my future. This led me to a slight mental complex regarding the topic that persists to this day, hence my activity on this sub-forum.

Thanks to the wonders of the internet, I now know that my foreskin definitely is on the longer side of average. When younger and erect, I could pull the skin down to about the corona (definitely not past it). This state persisted until I was finished with puberty, at which point frequent “further activities” showed I could pull it back further, but would cause discomfort. My frenulum is quite prominent as well, and was short - I resolved the frenulum breve by manual stretching over a few more years' time, and would consider myself completely retractable by now.

All that said, I pretty much had just a couple penis-related issues in my life - two infections down there as a boy that each resolved quickly + cleanly, and discovering a latex allergy later in life (that also affects my hands and is related to my line of work). Regarding the popularity of foreskin among sexual partners, I've written about that too, and my conclusion is that any ignorance is typically due to unfamiliarity and cultural norms rather than any particular malice, and that it's not a big deal either way once “in the flesh," so to speak. Because any woman seeing a guy's penis in person is probably attracted to him at some level, and a bit of skin ought not to be a deal-breaker at that point. When I've brought up the topic of circumcision with a number of American women aged 20-60, their reactions spanned the entire range from “it's a terrible practice" on one end, a lot of “I don't really know, isn't being circumcised supposed to be a good thing for hygiene and that's all I've experienced", a few “it doesn't matter at all,” all the way to those who think foreskin is gross and would cut any sons for sure. The last group, by the way, includes some people who are immigrants or whose families are from non-cutting cultures. So that's how strong the American cultural mores are! (And the anti-circumcision women include some that you'd think as ‘typical’ white Americans, so go figure…)

Having a foreskin that covers my glans and then some, when flaccid, I never had a problem with lesions as a kid probably because it was standard practice to grip the end when peeing so that the foreskin filled up with pee and could then be squeezed to shoot the pee as far, or as high as you could.

Standard peeing contests when I was a kid. Never knew any kids that were circumcised.

The only problems I had were later when I became sexually active. I discovered I have a rather short frenulum. Consequently, when erect if I retracted my foreskin I could only do it so far before it would pull the glans down.

I just put up with this until a certain young lady decided she would masturbate me forcing the skin down and eventually stretching the frenulum.

Circumcision wasn't something that was common in UK in the 40s unless you were Jewish, or had problems, phimosis ect.

The only problems I had were later when I became sexually active. I discovered I have a rather short frenulum. Consequently, when erect if I retracted my foreskin I could only do it so far before it would pull the glans down.

I just put up with this until a certain young lady decided she would masturbate me forcing the skin down and eventually stretching the frenulum.

I guess I must have had a short frenulum too, though I had no one to compare it to and oddly enough thinking back, not much was ever mentioned about this little bit of skin in the sex manuals I bought when young. It seemed that the assumption was that it was the correct length.

Well, mine wasn't, it too was on the short end and when retracting the foreskin, it was pretty bothersome at times. At one point , late teens I think, when 19 or 20 I began thinking about getting a very sharp blade (I don't think box cutters were sold yet, I was thinking of some sort of artists knife, used for cutting cardboard and such. Sharp, wicked things).

But I chickened out in the end. Decided a possible embarrassment if something turned out wrong wasn't worth it. Especially as I was the only person who'd have sex with me ... ha ha.

Eventually I began stretching my foreskin, kept at it and without being all that aware of the outcome, the frenulum stretched along with everything else and the problem was solved.

I grew up having my mother retract it to wash under it at every bath. I thought all boys could do that. Mine went back easily. Whenever my aunt came to visit bringing her half dozen girls of all ages, the tub was placed on the kitchen table and my mother showed them how to bath the baby. My father's home movies show all those girls playing with little me's penis inside and out.

Before entering 1st grade my mother told me I would see boys who didn't look like me because they had that skin cut off when they were born.

If I really pulled it down hard the frenulum would bend the tip down and when I got older the tip would get stuck behind the glans sometimes when masturbating. It would usually be back in place by morning but when it wasn't the glans was dry and fun to play with which caused me to masturbate again in the morning.

After I got married the frenulum ripped several times thanks to the sex-ed we DIDN'T have so now it's like not having one and my foreskin can be retracted way back.

@roscoe Interesting she preempted the question you may have had about different penises.

The only forced retractions were the ones I did myself. I knew it was supposed to go back and my doctor never even looked at it so I took matters into my own hands

@roscoe Interesting she preempted the question you may have had about different penises.

It was thoughtful of her when I consider the other sex ed I got. Meaning NONE!!! but she was over 40 at the time.

My sex ed was "don't touch a girl here or especially not there".

I still had a tight foreskin in puberty, so the doctors who did my first genital exams applied force to get it back. They also complained about its tightness but postponed voting for circumcision a couple of times. Becoming aware of the danger of becoming circumcised I regularly forcibly retracted myself (sometimes mutually with another guy who also had a tight foreskin).

In fact, until the age of 15 or 16 every really thorough cleaning under my foreskin I performed under more or less forced retraction condition

Also my foreskin used to be kind of stuck to my glans at some pieces, which was also torn piece by piece during those hard retractions (and the last parts became loose during my first intercourses which also hurt).

Still today I sometimes do forced retractions to myself, and love to do it to other guys (especially those with more or less tight foreskins).

I have, but have no recollection of them! I just know it was tried before I was sent to the hospital!