Where is the younger generation of medfetters? 20s-30 max?

I’m in my late 60’s, and I work around a lot of young adults in their 20’s, and 30’s. I get the impression that they aren’t as sexually open as we were in the 70’s and 80’s. Sex toys, rimming, and anal sex, were popular, and openly discussed. I may be wrong, but it seems like people today are more restricted.

Restricted isn't the word for people nowadays: try using the descriptions: prudish, priggish, moralistic, strait-laced, stuffy or Neo-Victorian.

So no, you are not wrong at all. The thing is though, that a certain type of politician, religious leader etc keep on repeating how depraved and sexually corrupted our present times are supposed to be and many people end up believing this. They erroneously think we are living in licentious times.

This is so disheartening an evolution to observe. I grew up in the decades where in some (Western) countries/states you could actually go to jail or be chemically castrated if caught engaging in homosexual acts. And many deplore this is no longer the case and clammer to restore such legislation.

Enough to despair.

I am in my mid 20s and open to chatting with anyone.

Restricted isn't the word for people nowadays: try using the descriptions: prudish, priggish, moralistic, strait-laced, stuffy or Neo-Victorian.

So no, you are not wrong at all. The thing is though, that a certain type of politician, religious leader etc keep on repeating how depraved and sexually corrupted our present times are supposed to be and many people end up believing this. They erroneously think we are living in licentious times.

This is so disheartening an evolution to observe. I grew up in the decades where in some (Western) countries/states you could actually go to jail or be chemically castrated if caught engaging in homosexual acts. And many deplore this is no longer the case and clammer to restore such legislation.

Enough to despair.

I can recall some talk of passing laws that allow castration either surgically or chemically as punishment for a repeat offender of sex crimes but it was no more than talk and never came to fruition in any state that I know of. However they seem to have done much worse than that with the sex offender lists. They seem to be a much wider broom to sweep with and easier to use. It used to be violating a federal law was the dumbest thing a person could do because you would have nearly zero chance of escaping the law. Many crimes did not rise to the level of federal offenses. Murder was not a federal crime it was up to whatever state it happened in to enforce their own laws. Now the federal government seems to have taken over everything and doesn't have the resources to do that very well. My army buddy owned a light plane (1960) and never took the keys out when leaving it because it was a federal crime to steal one so they rarely got stolen. Today you would be foolish to do that. Messing with a mail box or stealing mail is a federal crime and you would be foolish to do that in the past but today the post office laughs at you if you think they will investigate your busted mail box or missing mail. Postal inspectors were the first government agents to carry guns and mail trucks have the supreme right of way on our highways. When I drove a semi carrying mail into Boston I was told not to stop for anything until I turned the box over to the postmaster at South Station Annex. You don't have to stop for the police, fire trucks, or ambulances.

The younger generation - 20s, 30s, 40s didn't grow up with rectal thermometers, enemas, nudity in the locker room showers. They didn't even grow up with radio and television. They grew up in the digital age and are attached to their smart phones. They may be more liberal and politically correct but are much more prudish sexually. Gay and heterosexual young adults alike.

i've just seen this thread and confess i have not read but a few of the comments, so cannot respond to the "consensus." But, this comment did catch my attention. i work as a critical care nurse in a mid sized teaching hospital, i've worked there for nine years now. i am daily (truly) impressed by the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) that i work with. >80% of them are in their early 20's, some younger. They work a 12.5 hour shift answering call lights, wiping dirty butts, endlessly changing and cleaning up people who have wet and soiled themselves. Taking difficult people tangled in wires and hoses to the restroom. Dealing with people who are often mean and inconsiderate, people who are verbally abusive are a normal part of our day, some throw things and try to hit or kick us, spit on us. We always have a some of this kind of patient on the floor, it never goes away. Yet they daily return to the job, and for 12.5 hours are kind, considerate, professionals. It never ceases to amaze and encourage me that this generation has wonderful people of substance.

i have also sometimes wondered if some of them may be a bit kinky, but none of them ever lets that part show. We all have a bit of a macabre and different sense of humor. It comes with the territory, part of a coping/survival mechanism me thinks.

i have found many of these younger people to be mature beyond anything i had at that age.

@tallslenderguy I agree with all of that. I've been in the hospital a couple times in the last 2-3 years. I had cellulitis and was unable to use one leg doe to the pain. I had to have someone wipe my ass because I couldn't put any weight on the foot I need to, to wipe myself. The poor girl had to do that for me and one time she got tangled with my balls and pulled them part way up my ass. She felt terrible about it and kept apologizing to me. I thought it was just something that could happen given the circumstances and told her that. I said when you turn 75 they should chop those useless things off anyway just to get them out of the way.

One time the guy in the bed next to me was so verbally abusive I don't know how they put up with him and he wasn't incapacitated at that time he was just waiting to go to a rehab place. Another time there was a woman in another room who was so loud with her ugly mean diatribe you could hear her several rooms away. That went on all night and every time a nurse looked in on me she would apologize for the noise.

One time a nurse who happened to recognize me from work came in to get a "sterile" urine sample. When I was about to overflow the cup she quickly shoved a "urinal" bottle in place scraping my inner foreskin and then the back of the coronal ridge when removing it. Well, those things happen, I wasn't upset. Another time I was standing next to the bed waiting in a room they were getting ready for me. I couldn't get in it yet because they hadn't changed the bedding yet. there were a half dozen girls coming and going getting the room ready when a girl came in to put that pad on my back. She had me strip naked because she was going to have to check me all over before I could get in the bed. She left the room with me standing there naked and all those other girls coming and going doing their jobs. There was a curtain between the two beds but I had the first bed with nothing between me and the door. She left me like that for about 10 minutes when she came back with a gown. Some people think that was awful but I just think she probably had to attend to something or someone else who needed her more than I did. The hospital has lost about half their staff since Covid and their patient load has increased substantially so the ones who ARE there are overworked. I was just there for a stress test in the morning and an MRI.

I am 60ish and going on 16. many of the comments that I make here. I wouldn't think of making when I was 16. Yes, I've come a long way, baby!

I am in my 30s, and still enjoying med-fet and this community very much. We're out there!

I am 60ish and going on 16. many of the comments that I make here. I wouldn't think of making when I was 16. Yes, I've come a long way, baby!

@ddell2 I agree. I'm an 18 year old in an 83 year old skin. Many things I am comfortable talking about today I would never have even considered 65 years ago. I have several medical appointments coming up soon and I have a list of questions to ask that I would have been embarrassed to ask when I was younger.

I'm 29 and discovered this site recently, but was into medfet since I was about 15yo or so. Glad to find a community where I can openly talk about it. I hope I'll find a woman who wants to play with me. I'm into enemas and uretral play. 🙂 Hope to talk with you soon !

Interesting….I’ve always had to pay to play. Over 25 years, I’ve had 4 actual fetish patients who actually enjoyed being patient as much as I enjoyed being their doctor. I’m only in touch with one still. I’m near 50 and she’s 38, with a nice tight belly just like doctor wants 😋. I’ll be quite honest here. Early in my adulthood, I mostly played with escorts. Worked well but it was expensive and after certain websites that made things safer for all involved disappeared, became kinda sketchy. Gave up for a while. Now I’m on seeking arrangements. An escort I saw years ago suggested I try it out. I’ve found some amazing young women to play with. Yes, doctor likes them young….but always legal. I’ve been very pleasantly surprised at how many of these young ladies end up really enjoying the examination. I feel like the current generation is very open minded and eager to explore their hidden…or not so hidden…,kinky side. Unfortunately, still paying to play, but for me it’s worth it. I think the potential in this younger generation is great, very open minded, if only they’d come seeking on this board 🤷🏼‍♂️.

A medfetter here. I'll be 22 soon. I joined this site just for my love of injections. I felt like this site was too much for me. Fantasizing only about cute injection scenarios, I was almost vanilla at a place with such diverse kinks. But with time, as I talked to more people, I started getting into some more medical procedures.

Injections are something I've always liked. Since I was quite young. But I'm still exploring and exposing myself to different discussions and stories. It's just I'm unsure of what I can like and endure just yet. I'm a late bloomer I guess :-)

I don't know if it's just me, but my kinky days aren't consistent. Sometimes I'm almost vanilla, then a craving hits when I get the urge to get naughtier and talk to someone even naughtier.

@Emerald_queen There is a huge diversity of kinks here, huge diversity of experiences and tastes, I hope you find suitable matches!

I think a lot has changed over the years towards patient centered care and asking for consent to do many parts of exams as well as anyone coming in to observe.

Growing up we were told to do whatever the medical providers told us to do and they often “ambushed” patients at the last minute with observers that made it very difficult to say no.

They no longer do group physicals at public schools that I know of and I think you would get many refusal’s because of doctors like Larry Nasser.

They also do not always complete genital exams unless there is a problem or some kind of history I can remember seeing my children’s pediatrician either during or after as they got older and he or she would ask any issues “down there” and since they never had any genital exams were intermittent at best.

For these reasons and I am sure others far less exposure in medical settings and number of people observing is now the norm.

@GregB When I was a kid, I endured two digital rectal exams and in neither case I was told I would get a finger up there (the second time, I knew it would happen because of similarities with the first one, but the first one was a surprise). I think nowadays they would not ambush kids like that.

I’ve been on here since I was in my late twenties or so. I’m in my late thirties now.

28 and have been around in here since I was 19 or 20! 😃

I think that the older generations were examined with far less concern for patient modesty and therefore it was easier to sexualize the experience. If I experienced the type of exam performed nowadays growing up, I probably wouldn't have the same intense emotions connected with medical exams. I also believe that the vast amount of sexual material available today has dulled the younger generation's reaction to nudity and sex. Getting naked and seeing someone naked, as well as touching of intimate areas, carried much more weight as you couldn't simply pull up a multitude of websites with far more graphic images and content.

I also believe that the vast amount of sexual material available today has dulled the younger generation's reaction to nudity and sex.

The vast amount?

There may be the internet, but in the real world and media like movies and TV and published books/magazines, there is far far less than back in the 1980s-90s.

The younger generation of med fetters are probably watching the scenarios on hamster, pornhub, and other porn channels.

The vast amount?

There may be the internet, but in the real world and media like movies and TV and published books/magazines, there is far far less than back in the 1980s-90s.

@agracier growing up, if you wanted to see boobs, you either convinced a girl to show you hers or stole a porn magazine from your friend's father. Both methods required effort. Most media has gone digital, so physical media is slowly disappearing. Mainstream movies and TV can't compete with the internet, so a nude scene in a movie doesn't hold the weight it did years ago. Personally, I enjoy watching the old sexploitation movies of the 1970s. It seems like they understood the psychology of sex, not just the physical aspect like most of today's media.

growing up, if you wanted to see boobs, you either convinced a girl to show you hers or stole a porn magazine from your friend's father.

Growing up I simply bought such magazines. They were relatively easy to get and by the 1970-80s, sex shops were everywhere. Even regular newsstands sold magazines with content that nowadays they wouldn't handle with a ten foot pole. Secondhand bookstores had sections dedicated to erotic publications. In any decent sized city you could find a number of such stores.

After 2001 all of this began to phase out. Newsstands stopped carrying erotic mags, sex shops closed, secondhand bookstores no longer had sections for erotica.

Yes, now there is the internet, but in all honesty the content is not the same. It is mostly corporate junk while in the past things were certainly more tasteful and more in the open. Not hidden away on the Internet.

I think one difference is that 1970s porn was longer movies that pretended to have some kind of scenario, albeit a cheesy one, while most current porn is short sequences depicting certain sexual acts out of any kind of story context.

I think one difference is that 1970s porn was longer movies that pretended to have some kind of scenario, albeit a cheesy one, while most current porn is short sequences depicting certain sexual acts out of any kind of story context.

There is something in this observation.

Porn does tend to become shorter and shorter in length, although if you look for compilations of true illicit old porn footage, there are so many vids that compile porn shorts from the 30s-40s-50s that each last only a few minutes. These were celluloid scenes showing one setting with not much more than traditional sexual activity going on. Apparently these were often shown in (legal French) brothels or at stag parties at the time. So, these are not much longer than our present day clips we find on the Internet, like on Onlyfans, Twitter, Chaturbate screencaps etc.

And it's also possible our attention spans have been altered/infected by the pace and exigencies of modern life. We have limited time for just about everything and need to jump and forth between various subjects at work and at home. A polite word for that is multitasking. It means juggling several tasks at the same time and not being able to apply one's full attention to any.

On a side note, this seems to apply to modern novel writing as well. Short chapters, disjointed story, telling hopping about from character to character, different povs and locations. It's getting so it's hard to follow modern day novels and who is who or what is happening. While rereading older ones shows there was more continuity and development in writing a novel.

@agracier I think it's a question of monetization. In the 1970s there used to be porn movies shown in theaters (in France if I'm not mistaken : in regular theaters then in specialized theaters after regular theaters were prohibited from showing them). You had to sell tickets etc and I suspect this makes sense only if the movie lasts some length. People won't bother coming to a theater, get in line for a ticket etc. for something that lasts 5 minutes. If you have short clips you must at least market them as one compilation.

Nowadays people access it through the Internet from their home and it's monetized by advertisements and sometimes subscription.

In the 1970s there used to be porn movies shown in theaters (in France if I'm not mistaken : in regular theaters then in specialized theaters after regular theaters were prohibited from showing them). You had to sell tickets etc and I suspect this makes sense only if the movie lasts some length. People won't bother coming to a theater, get in line for a ticket etc. for something that lasts 5 minutes. If you have short clips you must at least market them as one compilation.

That is right, there were such 'sex' theaters back then. But if you now look at the material shown, it wasn't really porn. There were lots of naked breasts and bottoms, often pubic hair which is the same as showing nothing, but no explicit scenes with erect penises or spread open legs and vaginal slits. It was exciting for the times, but not porn as in the illicit material or what we now know.

I went to such theaters a few times when in university in the early 1970s. It was disappointing stuff, even back then.

That said there were some very successful series back then like the German produced 'Schulmaedchen Report', with at least 13 movies in the series. But when you view them now, they are cute and amusing, fun-loving, but not really arousing at all. That is why on porn sites, such material is usually classified as 'soft porn'. Sort of like a tad more explicit David Hamilton movie (like Bilitis, Tendres Cousins, A Summer in St. Tropez) but a tad more vulgarish in a way. Lots of promise of sex in the air, but little really ever delivered to the viewers. Or movies like the prize-winning compilation 'Pornografi'.

And come to think of it, movies like the 'Schulmaedchen Report' series and certainly 'Pornografi' were really nothing than a series of short scenes, many bearing little continuity to the next.

This also reminds that not so long ago I tried watching the big 1970s hit 'I Am Curious (Yellow)'. Talk about much ado about nothing in the way of sex. Absolutely boring and a few nude scenes. But a big hit back in the 1970s.

But anyway, you are right about the sex theaters, they had to offer something of considerable length to justify entry price.

I'm 35 and I especially enjoy chatting with the younger members. For reasons like you mentioned

That is right, there were such 'sex' theaters back then. But if you now look at the material shown, it wasn't really porn. There were lots of naked breasts and bottoms, often pubic hair which is the same as showing nothing, but no explicit scenes with erect penises or spread open legs and vaginal slits. It was exciting for the times, but not porn as in the illicit material or what we now know.

I went to such theaters a few times when in university in the early 1970s. It was disappointing stuff, even back then.

.

This also reminds that not so long ago I tried watching the big 1970s hit 'I Am Curious (Yellow)'. Talk about much ado about nothing in the way of sex. Absolutely boring and a few nude scenes. But a big hit back in the 1970s.

But anyway, you are right about the sex theaters, they had to offer something of considerable length to justify entry price.

I recall going to some Bridgette Bardot movies hoping to see something that never materialized other than that there were a few scenes in older movies where a dancer showed a quick shot of her bush. Most of those had already been cut out of the print before our theater got them for some other projectionist's collection.

The first split beaver I saw was in Hustler magazine.

Today I think I would prefer seeing things like Naked And Afraid without the blurring.

I recall going to some Bridgette Bardot movies hoping to see something that never materialized other than that there were a few scenes in older movies where a dancer showed a quick shot of her bush. Most of those had already been cut out of the print before our theater got them for some other projectionist's collection.

If I am not mistaken, Playboy used to run articles on 'Sex in the Movies' or some similar title. It would mainly consist of screenshots, usually blurry stuff, that contained imagery of naked bodies, breasts and such that had been carefully looked for and lifted from contemporary movies. It was pretty pathetic stuff when looked at now, but then it was seemingly popular.

You could also find many published books with similar photos, quite often French publications along with basic information on the movies they were taken from. I come across such old books from the 70s often enough at flea-markets or secondhand bookstores, but they are virtually impossible to sell anymore, not even getting customers at 1 euro.

Growing up I simply bought such magazines.

@agracier Here in the States, you have to be 18 to purchase such magazines. That's why you had to steal them from a friend's father. Otherwise, you could have a female friend purchase them for you. The horny newsstand operators were happy to sell to a girl who wasn't 18.

I think one difference is that 1970s porn was longer movies that pretended to have some kind of scenario, albeit a cheesy one, while most current porn is short sequences depicting certain sexual acts out of any kind of story context.

@Pecan_nutjob I'm talking more about the sexploitation films like the ones directed by Jess Franco and others. However, I agree that porn depicting just intercourse looks like a collection of body parts more than anything erotic.

And it's also possible our attention spans have been altered/infected by the pace and exigencies of modern life.

@agracier There's definitely a change in how we consume all media content today. We consume all forms of media in short bursts rather than extended format. Whether lifestyle, attention span, or the media itself is to blame for starting this trend is up for debate.

I'm a 20s something Gen Z and I think I've had a pretty "traditional" doctors experience so far with regard to undressing and the doctor being more hands-on, so I wouldn't say that the old method of examination is completely gone yet. I do think it varies a lot more these days, even regionally, depending on the practice and the doctors themselves, which is why I've made it a point to more thoroughly vet my potential doctors and look for family practices that might be more old-fashioned or set in their ways. Another thing also is that I don't think a lot of young people are on here in general or even know this site exists, they are more likely on mainstream social media so we are just seeing a filter bias on here. Overall I think everyone agrees that todays exams can be less thorough, less detailed, and more modest now. But at least in medical fetish, things don’t have to change! (except into a gown 😜) Personally I prefer the strict, thorough, and more “old-fashioned” type of exams from an older, experienced doc. So if you're asking where the younger generation is? Well, I’m telling you where I am. Right here! And waiting to be examined by you! 😁