Double Balloon EU

My trusty Double Balloon nozzle is nearing retirement age and replacement and I wonder what the forum members think is the best option right now?

I currently have this and although aesthetically I love it I've often felt the distance between the 2 balloons is a bit too long?

https://www.medtech3000.de/Doppelballon-Darmrohr-mit-2-Geblaese-Darmkatheter-Ballondarmrohr::409.html

This doesn't look as appealing, but it has a shorter gap. Would it be better?

https://www.medtech3000.de/Ruesch-Doppelballon-Darmrohr-nach-Gaul-Doppelballondarmrohr::8.html

Or something else from an EU based seller?

Thanks.

I have both, and I switch back and forth. The first one you listed is my fav, but if I have a really tough to hold solution I can push that one out. The second one I can inflate bigger and it holds, but is not as comfortable for long retention, and no control of the balloons individually.

@blob

I would opt for the one in the first link, because you can inflate the balloons individually.

Medtech apparently doesn't sell silicone double balloon catheters, but many other suppliers do.

For example, from Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/CleanStream-Double-Silicone-Enema-Catheter/dp/B003CU684W/

I don't know about availability in the EU

Agree with @Sean. I've bought a couple of the CleanStream off Amazon and have been relatively pleased with them considering the price and the comments about their quality. I may have simply been lucky, but I would buy one again for sure.

I have one of the Amazon cleanstream units as well. It leaked out of the box where the balloons are affixed to the tube. I cleaned it up real well with alcohol and put a layer of silpoxy at the bond line. Has provided several years of service now. It probably gets used twice a month. I do find that the 750cc balloon is bigger than I prefer, but it works. Years back I had the 500cc front balloon version, that I really liked. It popped after about ten years of service. If anyone knows where to find them, please post.

Senttobedempty, I had same problem, and did same fix!

My trusty Double Balloon nozzle is nearing retirement age and replacement and I wonder what the forum members think is the best option right now?

I currently have this and although aesthetically I love it I've often felt the distance between the 2 balloons is a bit too long?

https://www.medtech3000.de/Doppelballon-Darmrohr-mit-2-Geblaese-Darmkatheter-Ballondarmrohr::409.html

This doesn't look as appealing, but it has a shorter gap. Would it be better?

https://www.medtech3000.de/Ruesch-Doppelballon-Darmrohr-nach-Gaul-Doppelballondarmrohr::8.html

Or something else from an EU based seller?

Thanks.

Blob, I've got both and prefer the second one. It has a shorter distance between the balloons, as you note, and seals better. You also don't have the the two inflators hanging down. Although at times it is a challenge to get it inflated without loosing air. I have a second shut off that I use instead of the plug.

I also have both but prefer the first on. The second one, the balloons are sharing the same inflation source. When the water pressure in the bowel builds up, it pushes the air from the inner balloon to the outer balloon and then it will leak. The first one you can really inflate it to get a good seal.

I have both and love the second one. When using the first one, my "enema nurse" will insert BOTH nozzles. The first one typically goes beyond the rectal valve. The seal is excellent and the feeling is indescribable.

@EnemaAndIvory said

I have both and love the second one. When using the first one, my "enema nurse" will insert BOTH nozzles. The first one typically goes beyond the rectal valve. The seal is excellent and the feeling is indescribable.

Both NOZZLES or both BALLOONS???

I would expect two nozzles being inserted to compromise the seal and severe leaking would occur.

Two balloons would keep a good seal.

I've never used the second one, but have had the first for many years. When sufficiently inflated (for me, ~8-12 pumps) it gives a very good seal of my anus between the two balloons, allowing me to hold 4-5 quarts for as long as I like. Why would you want to insert both balloons when it's designed to have one in and one out?

Eric

The one that uses two infiltrators is very straightforward, you inflate the balloons individually and leave the inflation bulbs in place. The other one requires a syringe that while attached, fills both balloons at once, you cannot control the individual pressures. I find that it works well, but found that using a 50cc syringe takes multiple cycles to fill the balloons. To do that, have to disconnect the syringe, stop the air from leaking out by pressing on the small valve, re-attach the syringe and force more air in, you could use water. I've found it cumbersome to use, as stated prefer the one that takes two bulbs.

I use a regular rubber squeeze bulb for filling the Rusch double balloon and a three foot tube extension so I don't require the squeeze bulb to be close to my body.

I have a proprietary method of doing that.

Even though one bulb fills both balloons, the inner balloon is larger than the outer balloon, but that isn't usually recognized unless you inflate the balloons while you hold them in your hand. The inner balloon gets at least twice the diameter of the outer balloon.

Thanks for all the replies so far, much appreciated. Mixed voting on 1 or 2 though!

As for inserting both the bulbs 😮

Thanks for all the replies so far, much appreciated. Mixed voting on 1 or 2 though!

As for inserting both the bulbs 😮

So with both balloons inside you and inflated, the reason you do so is just because it feels more invasive, full and erotic? I love putting double balloons in my rear and inflating them, even sometimes without using it for an enema but just masturbation. So I'm curious about your experience doing this. Thanks,

Eric

I like the true double balloon latex one you show. The one with the 2 balloons connected can have a problem with a strong long cramp. The extra pressure on the inside one forces air to migrate to the outer one . Then suddenly you are in cleanup mode. When I bought my last one I was able to buy 2 for about $100 us. I am still on my first but it is nice to have a spare.

My 250/250 latex double balloon catheter split open today, first time I ever had one do that. I had just put it in, pumped 5 times and about 20 seconds later, pop. About an inch split in the distal balloon. I knew it was going to die, a kind of a pimple developed on the balloon, looked like a weak spot, and it was. Fortunately, I have a spare so I commenced the enema with a new nozzle. I ordered 2 new double balloon nozzles from Medtech3000. The price has increased, with VAT, shipping, the price of the nozzles was about $175. They are a little pricey, but last a long time if you take care of them.

Update on the split 250/250 latex nozzle. I cut all the damaged distal balloon off and tried to use it as a single balloon nozzle, but the 4" or so remaining latex tubing was much too flexible , and doubled over every time I tried to put it in my rectum. So, I cut off all but about an inch of the remaining tubing, plugged the distal balloon opening, inserted the single balloon and pumped it up with 6 pumps. I could really feel that balloon. I took a 2 1/2 qt, soapy enema - no problems and no leaks. The remaining balloon is in great shape, so i think the modified balloon nozzle is going to last for awhile.

I'm quite tempted order one of each. Spending too much money lately, but then I'm not going anywhere any time soon....

My 250/250 latex double balloon catheter split open today, first time I ever had one do that. I had just put it in, pumped 5 times and about 20 seconds later, pop. About an inch split in the distal balloon. I knew it was going to die, a kind of a pimple developed on the balloon, looked like a weak spot, and it was.

I have had several over the years and without spending a fortune the cheap ones never hold up more than a few times. I gave up in disgust but I know the medical quality balloons do last. I just can't justify spending a couple hundred dollars for a good one. I used to use a barium nozzle which is good enough to stay in place while I am doing other things.

I own the second one. It is of high quality, easy to insert, feels nice when in place (it puts pressure on the right spot), and I never had any problems with leakage. It is one of my favorite nozzles and I can definitely recommend it.

Https://www.medtech3000.de/Doppelballon-Darmrohr-Set::495.html. As much as I love my SN single balloon nozzle, the darn thing is so long that it really puts the water up higher than I'm used to. I thought it might be nice to try something that would work a little (or a lot) lower for the first one or two bags to clear the way for the final fun with Ole Faithful. I hate to admit it to myself, but I just don't have the strength of sphincter that I had 30 years ago and without inflation there will be leakage! From Medtech3000 I ordered the set with two different styles. I was hoping that the traditional design would work as well as I remembered in the mists of my youth.The other one in theory looked as though the air line was awfully small. I can appreciate that Switchable Susie did some modifications to hers.

It took a few weeks to get the order delivered (some may be attributed to COVID-19. What isn't, these days), but that was okay, they got here.

First problem with the "traditional" design: either the fittings on the inflators are too small or the sockets molded into the nozzle are too big.

Take your choice, but they do not fit securely. However, eager as I was to try out the toy of my dreams (wet), I proceeded, hoping that all would stay together. Well, that didn't work out, I got everything situated, inflated, started the flow, began to enjoy the sensations, and the inflator that had the most tenuous grasp on reality blew out, instantly deflating the interior balloon, resulting in a soggy mess and a very disappointing trial run.

Fortunately, I always put a tarp over the bedding, and I had the clamp in hand when I released it so I was able to clamp it back as soon as I realized things were going awry. At first, I thought I'd try to buy some aftermarket inflators, but without dimensions to compare, I couldn't be sure that another brand would solve the problem. I settled on mini-zip ties to clamp the tubing securely to the barbs on the inflator. I also used a different color for each one so I'd know which inflator was which. Problem solved. New problem, even though the inflators are secure, the balloons just don't seal everything 100%, there is still leakage at the dike. I will still experiment with it, but so far, it's not the answer I was hoping for. Now, the other one...even though it looks a lot different by comparison and the air line just doesn't look robust, the balloons work well with my anatomy and seals very well. SN's is the best for me overall, but I'll like having the option of not always having to go as deep as the SN goes. Here is a link to my favorite video making use of the Rusch Gaul double balloon enema catheter. What a beautiful, lucky patient. https://xhamster.com/videos/evil-enema-1241847.

I may have to plan some more experiments this weekend. This post has me thinking "those kinda thoughts".

Nozzle Tov!

@2BagsFull I have bought 4 of the 250/250 double balloon latex catheters, and all of them came with inflation bulbs that fit great. The bulbs were all different, 4 of the bulbs had a matte surface that collect dust and dirt like a magnet, i don't use those.

I agree with your assessment of SN's single balloon retention nozzle, the balloon part is too long, i find it very uncomfortable when pumped up enough to provide a good seal. I stopped using it, and finally just threw it away.

Second one. Much easier to insert and seal than the fluted balloons. Also, as has been mentioned, the inflation bulbs don't connect securely to the tubes on the first. When I ordered the second one, it came with an inflation bulb that had an extension like Susie describes and I like it a lot - keeps things out of the way. I've never had a problem with leakage with the second one.

The Rusch double balloons are easier to insert than the fluted ones because the central body of the catheter is stiffer than the fluted ones.

The video of the double balloon resonated with me, not as much the tube insertion, but with the subject was a transgender w/o surgery. At first glance one thinks she's a pretty woman until the scrotum and penis fall out, and later the domme strokes the penis.

The question is off the double balloon topic but applies to the person receiving the enema. Do readers think the person is a woman--transgender by appearance & gender preference--or a man--defined by the genitals?

Way back when, longer ago than I care to contemplate, I had the same difficulty with a double balloon catheter from that company we dare not name these days. Which is to say that when placed and inflated it did not offer enough traction or pull on the inner balloon to form a seal. Possibly this problem could be because of the use of plugs and or larger nozzles opening the inner sphincter. Or simple differences in anatomy. Whatever the cause, the result is unpleasant. It allows the inner balloon to rest not close enough to the outer sphincter. Voila, leakage. Sometimes a lot of it. I could use a hand to pull on the catheter thereby improving the seal. But then what’s the point of a second balloon at all? Not to mention the difficulty in changing positions, or getting up to move around.

Here is how I solved it. A cheap fix, but does require dexterity and a few tools. Cut a tennis ball in half or nearly so. Then punch a hole or drill one in the center of the half ball. Undoubtedly you will have to trim the hole with a razor knife to make it smooth. The hole need not be the exact size of the catheter but not large enough to irritate your tissues when in place. Next cut the ball from the outer edge to the center hole. Put the half ball gently between the two balloons by twisting the cut area open and sliding carefully into place. When you let go, the half ball will readopt its round shape around the catheter. After insertion of the inner balloon and inflation, carefully inflate the outer balloon to do no more than fill the inside of the ball. I think you will find that the soft surface of the tennis ball is not uncomfortable against you and effectively shortens the distance between the ballons. Obviously the ball will have to be removed and thoroughly washed for the next use as does any item used internally or at the anus after enemas.

I hope this idea helps those who are having leakage problems with these double balloon catheters.

Way back when, longer ago than I care to contemplate, I had the same difficulty with a double balloon catheter from that company we dare not name these days.

Thanks for understanding and keeping zity out of any problems. I recently did a search for the unnamed company and happily turned up no hits. Good work everyone not using brand names for equipment , particularly balloon nozzles.

I did get one of each.

Tested the Rusch nozzle this morning. It's harder to insert than the fluted one but forms a *much* better seal. Had a good couple of enemas with it and feeling nice and cleaned out.

The gap between the 2 bulbs on the new fluted one seems slightly smaller than on the old one, possibly a few years of use had stretched it? I'll test it out next time.

Many thanks for everyone's advice 😃

I was sent a prototype "shorty" variant of the Siliconenozzles balloon that is essentially just the body with a short tapered top on it (should get a picture up I suppose). It's big and fills the rectum, so it is not good for a first enema if you tend to have stool in the rectum. It seems to seal pretty well, but the feeling is very different as it fills up the rectum rather than just putting a bulge against the anus - good if you like strong prostate stimulation. It's also nice when used uninflated as a dildo as it is soft and there's something about the feel of the balloon piece that is nice when thrust in and out. I was able to borrow a "full SN balloon" once and I like the shorty better, as you don't need to feed in as much, but if I could only get one inflatable it would probably be the classic type (though I haven't tried a Rusch-design).