Are straight men comfortable with male ROLE PLAY doctor?

I am curious how straight men feel about the possibility of receiving role play exams done by a male doctor. Specifically, are they comfortable having the male doctor examining the genitalia and anus and providing the manipulation for obtaining the semen specimen?

This thread is like the thread, "Would straight men be spanked by or spank another man."

https://en.zity.biz/index.php?mx=forum;ox=display;topic=72097

The answer is NO.

ABSOLUTELY NOT.

Straight men do NOT want a play exam or to be jerked off by a male play doctor.

I would have thought, that in light of the other thread, the answer would obviously be the same.

For a man to be PLAY examined by or to PLAY examine another man he would have to be bisexual or homosexual whether or not he admitted it to himself.

PERIOD.

This thread is like the thread, "Would straight men be spanked by another man."

The answer is NO.

ABSOLUTELY NOT.

Straight men do NOT want a play exam by a male play doctor.

I would have thought, that in light of the other thread, the answer would obviously be the same.

@SwitchableSusie is absolutely, 100% correct!!!

NO!!! NO!!! NO!!!

Fn

Not today or anytime in my foreseeable future.

No.

No, but isn't that kind of ...the point?

No, but isn't that kind of ...the point?

NO, it is not.

I'm not sure why some posters are so adamant that the answer is no. I am straight, but I would be open to being a patient for a male roleplay doctor and allowing him to masturbate me for a semen sample. Kinsey says that everyone is at least a little bi. I would much prefer to be stripped and masturbated (in roleplay, medfet, or in any other situation) by a woman (CFNM), but in the absence of that I would let a guy strip and masturbate me (in any of those situations) if it would give him pleasure.

I'm not sure why some posters are so adamant that the answer is no. I am straight, but I would be open to being a patient for a male roleplay doctor and allowing him to masturbate me for a semen sample. Kinsey says that everyone is at least a little bi. I would much prefer to be stripped and masturbated (in roleplay, medfet, or in any other situation) by a woman (CFNM), but in the absence of that I would let a guy strip and masturbate me (in any of those situations) if it would give him pleasure.

I am bisexual and this answer is one a bisexual would make to a question posed by another bisexual. It could someone bi-curious and one time only, but the question AND the answer are from those of the bisexual persuasion.

This may be some men's fantasy to be the cause of another man 'switching' teams. The straight men I know would never consider letting another man touch them and cause them to ejaculate.

I very much prefer men, but because I engage in activities with women that involve a high level of intimacy and decidedly sexual responses, I am bisexual. And not just a little. ?

I was also never just a little pregnant. ?

As a straight male I would have never considered doing such a thing in the first place so the assessment of the level of comfort is not even a consideration.

I am far more amenable in role play to having a male “doc” examine me. Part of the thrill for me is trying and experiencing new things. For me, being exposed and vulnerable in front of a play doc overrides any concern about the gender. Of course, there needs to be be mutual trust and respect for boundaries, but that goes for all aspects of kinky play.

I'm not sure why some posters are so adamant that the answer is no. I am straight, but I would be open to being a patient for a male roleplay doctor and allowing him to masturbate me for a semen sample. Kinsey says that everyone is at least a little bi. I would much prefer to be stripped and masturbated (in roleplay, medfet, or in any other situation) by a woman (CFNM), but in the absence of that I would let a guy strip and masturbate me (in any of those situations) if it would give him pleasure.

https://bisexuality.wikia.org/wiki/Alfred_Kinsey

I don't know that Kinsey ever said that - the Kinsey scale goes from completely heterosexual to completely homosexual - if everyone is somewhat bisexual then there are no truly heterosexual people as he proposed. Kinsey himself was bisexual. If you let someone of the same sex get you off sexually - you are NOT 100% straight.

@nebag said

I'm not sure why some posters are so adamant that the answer is no. I am straight, but I would be open to being a patient for a male roleplay doctor and allowing him to masturbate me for a semen sample. Kinsey says that everyone is at least a little bi. I would much prefer to be stripped and masturbated (in roleplay, medfet, or in any other situation) by a woman (CFNM), but in the absence of that I would let a guy strip and masturbate me (in any of those situations) if it would give him pleasure.

Being a patient for a role play where a man jerks you off is clearly NOT STRAIGHT

============

@CitraHops said

I am far more amenable in role play to having a male “doc” examine me. Part of the thrill for me is trying and experiencing new things. For me, being exposed and vulnerable in front of a play doc overrides any concern about the gender. Of course, there needs to be be mutual trust and respect for boundaries, but that goes for all aspects of kinky play.

In your profile you said you are heteroflexible, so you are not a straight heterosexual male either.

Other members who posted here have listed their orientation as UNSURE, so we are getting answers from men who are NOT straight/heterosexual, that they would have play exams with other men.

@Ms_Lila said

I am bisexual and this answer is one a bisexual would make to a question posed by another bisexual. It could someone bi-curious and one time only, but the question AND the answer are from those of the bisexual persuasion.

This may be some men's fantasy to be the cause of another man 'switching' teams. The straight men I know would never consider letting another man touch them and cause them to ejaculate.

I very much prefer men, but because I engage in activities with women that involve a high level of intimacy and decidedly sexual responses, I am bisexual. And not just a little. ?

I was also never just a little pregnant. ?

I totally agree

It is a well-known phenomenon of human sexuality that even if someone is straight that if the only available sexual outlet is a same sex encounter that that becomes at least a little bit attractive. As Kinsey demonstrated, in any given set of life circumstances nobody is completely "straight" or completely anything. Hundreds of straight guys (including me) have written about their enjoyment of male doctors handling their genitals during exams. Are people questioning whether these guys are in fact straight? Just like one can be, say, a Democrat and not agree 100% with every position of the Democratic party, one can be straight but also get some enjoyment from a "bi" experience.

As Kinsey demonstrated, in any given set of life circumstances nobody is completely "straight" or completely anything.

Kinsey says that everyone is at least a little bi.

Two posts allude to the fact that Kinsey stated everyone is a little bit "bi". Like @Ms_Lila said - you can't be a little bit pregnant - you are or you aren't. Same with your sexual orientation.

If anyone could point to a reference where Kinsey states this the I'd be interested to see it. I've not come across that.

I am glad to provide this direct quote from Kinsey himself. “Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects. While emphasizing the continuity of the gradations between exclusively heterosexual and exclusively homosexual histories, it has seemed desirable to develop some sort of classification which could be based on the relative amounts of heterosexual and homosexual experience or response in each history [...] An individual may be assigned a position on this scale, for each period in his life. [...] A seven-point scale comes nearer to showing the many gradations that actually exist".

Just a friendly observation on the "pregnant" analogy. Yes, you CAN be a little pregnant or a lot pregnant. Just as Kinsey has posited that we are all at least a little bit bi, there IS a difference between a woman who is one day pregnant and one who is eight months pregnant. Some people are 99% gay and 1% straight and others are 1% gay and 99% straight, and everywhere in between.

@nebag Thanks for the reference. Agree that a lot of peoples sexual orientation can change over their life span - that said, they are not exclusively heterosexual. The issue I had was that fluctuation doesn't apply to everyone as implied in the posts. Not everyone is a little bit bi-sexual or bi-curious, some/many are completely straight. That reference by Kinsey supports why he came up with the 7 point scale between exclusively being heterosexual and the gradients between that and exlusive homosexual, but it doesn't imply "nobody is completely straight". If some of the male population is exclusively heterosexual as Kinsey states - then some segment of the population is "completely straight"..

Just a friendly observation on the "pregnant" analogy. Yes, you CAN be a little pregnant or a lot pregnant. Just as Kinsey has posited that we are all at least a little bit bi, there IS a difference between a woman who is one day pregnant and one who is eight months pregnant.

Some people are 99% gay and 1% straight and others are 1% gay and 99% straight, and everywhere in between.

That's ridiculous - both are pregnant. And I still don't see where Kinsey ever said everyone is a little bit bi - why did he have a heterosexual only category? Some people (male or female) are 100% straight and some are 100% homosexual - and some, as Kinsey states, are in between.

Because we can't ask Kinsey precisely what he meant there will be different interpretations of his conclusions. My honest assessment is that he meant that although at any given moment a person might be "completely heterosexual", that over the course of a person's life (according to the situation) there is inevitable fluctuation. If someone wants to claim that I'm not "straight" because I'm not 100% straight 100% of the time then yes, that is true. All I'm saying is that Kinsey would say that that is true of everyone.

@nebag said

Just a friendly observation on the "pregnant" analogy. Yes, you CAN be a little pregnant or a lot pregnant. Just as Kinsey has posited that we are all at least a little bit bi, there IS a difference between a woman who is one day pregnant and one who is eight months pregnant. Some people are 99% gay and 1% straight and others are 1% gay and 99% straight, and everywhere in between.

NO NO NO. Not at all. Absolutely, definitely, positively NOT.

YOUR ACTIVITY can be 1% homosexual and 99% heterosexual or somewhere in between, but THE PERSON is either heterosexual, bisexual or homosexual.

It is the same with pregnancy. The person is either pregnant or NOT pregnant. The duration of the condition is NOT part of the definition.

I am heteroflexible. Call me bisexual if you like I do not care. My sexual activity is 1-2% homosexual and 98-99% heterosexual. That officially makes me bisexual. I listed heteroflexible in my profile because the FREQUENCY of homosexual activity is very small. It still is bisexual and I would never claim to be a straight heterosexual because I'm not, despite the tiny amount of homosexual activity I am involved with.

In the same manner, many men here need to get with the program and accept what they really are, not what they want to be called.

Because we can't ask Kinsey precisely what he meant there will be different interpretations of his conclusions. ..... If someone wants to claim that I'm not "straight" because I'm not 100% straight 100% of the time then yes, that is true. All I'm saying is that Kinsey would say that that is true of everyone.

How do you know Kinsey would say that is true of everyone if we can't ask him what he really meant?? I don't believe he said our inferred that being partially gay/bisexual is true for everyone - that is you interpretation - not necessarily Kinsey's.

The Kinsey studies are akin to Freud's studies in that much of it has since been disallowed as valid due to poor statistical sampling methods and overt subjective conclusions.

I can only share what seem to me to be reasonable interpretations and common sense observations. We all look at things through our own lens and clearly some of my fellow posters feel very strongly about this topic. As with any group of people, we each have had different experiences and it's to be expected that we would have a variety of views. I think we've each succeeded in presenting our views and I wish everyone well.

@nebag

Because we can't ask Kinsey precisely what he meant there will be different interpretations of his conclusions. My honest assessment is that he meant that although at any given moment a person might be "completely heterosexual", that over the course of a person's life (according to the situation) there is inevitable fluctuation. If someone wants to claim that I'm not "straight" because I'm not 100% straight 100% of the time then yes, that is true. All I'm saying is that Kinsey would say that that is true of everyone.

What would be wrong with your not being straight 100% of the time? What would be wrong with your being bisexual? @SwitchableSusie identifies as being 'heteroflexible' because she engages in 'homosexual' sex 1-2% of the time. I've identified as 'bisexual' because, now, just under half of my sexual encounters have been 'homosexual' by definition with other women. My preference is decidedly for men because if my husband wanted us to become exclusive, I would although I would still have 'those feelings'. Although @SwitchableSusie I have to wonder where the cutoff point is for one being able to consider themselves as 'heteroflexible' as relates to 'bisexual'. 😉

@nebag this was a good topic, https://en.zity.biz/index.php?mx=forum;ox=display;msg=861011 and may be more on point. I still have to say that no 'straight' or 'heterosexual' man would consider having another man examine him in a non-medical or play setting.

When considering a question like this, I would certainly consider it quite important what kind of male were playing the examining doctor. A Tom of Finland hunk with more muscles than Charles Atlas? A hairy guy with hair covering every part of his hands and face (not to mention elsewhere)? A younger male, older, slim, overweight, balding, effeminate or swishy, openly gay and so on?

Some I would probably find enjoyable. Other types I often don't even like being near in real life. There are so many types of males that it would be difficult to decide without knowing the individual themselves.

I could definitely see giving or receiving a play doc exam with a male participant. I am straight as a string and frankly do not understand gay romantic attachment at all (though I am not in the least homophobic.) This aspect of my sexuality predates my interest in females by several years and is essentially the same as it was when I was an adolescent male who got excited getting genital exams from a male doctor. However, I am in a committed long term marriage and don't have play doc sessions with anyone, men or women, outside of that. Fantasy, though? Sure, you bet!

I’m perfectly fine receiving exams from male doctors under certain circumstance. Part of my fetish developed when I was younger and had a male dr...when I started Role playing, I found That having a male dr really gave me that sense of embarrassment and vulnerability. Being straight has always made it that much worse but also made the exam seem much more realistic.

@Ms_Lila said

What would be wrong with your not being straight 100% of the time? What would be wrong with your being bisexual? @SwitchableSusie identifies as being 'heteroflexible' because she engages in 'homosexual' sex 1-2% of the time. I've identified as 'bisexual' because, now, just under half of my sexual encounters have been 'homosexual' by definition with other women. My preference is decidedly for men because if my husband wanted us to become exclusive, I would although I would still have 'those feelings'. Although @SwitchableSusie I have to wonder where the cutoff point is for one being able to consider themselves as 'heteroflexible' as relates to 'bisexual'.

I don't think there is a clear cut-off line. Heteroflexible is still Bisexual, the difference being one of frequency--how much homosexual activity do you have?

For myself 1-2% homosexual is a small percentage, but if I have some sort of sexual activity 350 days a year, then 1-2% is about 4-5 homosexual episodes per year on average.

For others they might consider up to 10% or 20% still heteroflexible, but it is still bisexual. Also, the access to people for sex between the two sexes can also make a difference. More than 10-20%, and it seems that the person has little preference for one sex over the other, and it may become a matter of access to people of the two sexes.

All this bickering is wearing me out. This website has its fair share of members who see their opinion as the only correct answer to a question. I don't think anybody or anything is going to ever change that. Discussion is one thing, arguing another.

Back to the original topic. I am a straight man, in a loving marriage, and I have never participated in a play exam and probably never will. However, the way I interpreted the OP, I would possibly allow a man to examine me in a role play setting. I say possibly because there are many factors involved with this decision. If the person is a stranger, what they look like, where would it take place, my attitude and mood at the time, etc. However, I would not feel comfortable with them jerking me off. That's something that would cross the line for me personally.

I guess I'm naive, I never realized that was always part of a play exam for everybody. Some of the biggest parts of my medfet are me thinking back and recalling memories of exposure, embarrassment, and anxiety from real experiences, as well as the power the doctor and nurse have over the patient. My feelings and thoughts, as well as the dialogue used during the exam are what fuel my excitement. All of this I could possibly get from a play exam with a male. I prefer my fantasies to be as realistic as possible, so the doctor jerking me off would ruin that.