I also love this in play exams and do it every time no matter what my play patient complains of.
She has the sniffles: rectovaginal exam.
She has allergies: rectovaginal exam.
But for real male doctors to do it to female patients without any symptoms seems a bit “tactile voyeuristic.”
(Cute term...I may need to trademark it?)
Anyway, I suggest tactile voyeurism happens more frequently than the medical profession willingly admits. I know it happened to my wife on a visit to a local male doctor when she had zero issues in that area.
This is a doctor that extended the privilege of ausculating her bare chest (gown dropped to waist) EVERY time she went in...once for an ear issue that was clearly a localized infection.
So this same dude, on another visit for a simple UTI, has her take off her jeans and panties and get in the stirrups to check her urethra. I can see the logic in that, and sure want to be present for the next exam because he proceeds to do a rectovaginal before he finishes.
Hmmmmm
I think he is just having a good time being a doctor with “plausible deniability” of wrong doing...after all, why not check “while he is down there.” I know I use that line in my play exams?
And I intend to go back with her on her next UTI or the like visit. I wonder if he will do the same thing with me in the room? Well, if he does, I may LEARN something for my next play exam??