Seeing the sole of the feet

One thing I like when seeing pictures of spanked women on the Web is when they kneel (or similar position) with a red bottom and no clothing below, and one sees the bottom and the sole of the feet. I find this sight so cute... it's a part of the body that's normally not shown.

How about you?

I don't think so. Foot fetishishism does nothing for me. Perhaps you need a vajankle PN?

Liquidsky: It's not foot fetichism... normally feet don't do anything for me, it's this particular pose (naked below, seeing the soles and bottom, perhaps spank or awaiting an enema...).

As Randy Newman said "baby take off your shoes real slow. Take off your dress, yes, yes, yes. You can leave your hat on, you can leave your hat on..." Or something like that.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G55cJrUs9VM

Pecan, you feel about the bottoms of women's feet the same way I feel about men's armpits. I find them very sexy for some reason. It's not a fetish for me. I don't like to lick them, smell them run my genitals on them, nothing like that. I just like to see them. But I am a huge chest girl. I love a man's chest with hair. Damn that's so freaking hot for me. Maybe like you it's a part that isn't seen very often. Odd, I don't believe I have ever shared that with anyone before. Maybe I was afraid that people would think I was really weird instead of just a little bit weird. LOL

Mashie

Mashie, I would guess that loving a man's hairy chest is pretty mainstream, so no worries about being seen as too weird. I think we're all erotically and lovably weird here.

Yes, seeing his chest and loving it is very mainstream, but not so much his armpits, lol.

Mashie

Mashie: Actually... I think seeing their soles increases the impression of submissiveness and nakedness. ;-) And I'm a switch, and I like seeing females submit to a spanking or enema.

LOL Pecan, I and Doc are both switches too. And again, I think armpits also show a bit of vulnerability in a man. You don't often get to see his armpits. When someone raises their hands up over their head they are leaving themselves wide open and unprotected. So having someone tied to the bed with their arms up over their head is extra hot for me because it means they are completely exposed and 100 percent vulnerable. Which is exactly how I like my men when I am in bed. You know, Doc is going to probably beat my ass for saying that, lol. But then again, is that really such a bad thing? HEHEHE

Mashie

The woman getting spanked should absolutely have her naked soles exposed. I guess its all part of the foot fetish for me. However @Mashie has me thinking armpits for some reason. Possibly!

But if you look at my avatar you'll see rightvawsy where I stand with naked soles lol

I envoy seeing a submissive in position for a spanking with their bare feet exposed. The way I can tell if the spanking or other punishment is real (as opposed to disingenuous fetish porn), is to watch the soles of their feet scrunch up as they anticipate each stroke.

I like seeing this as well, there is something erotic about. When i spank, i require the spankee to remove shoes (i am Domme and usually only spank women)

This figures into the foot worship / fetish discussion held elsewhere within Zity. As a barefoot advocate I appreciate, no, I insist on the culprit being barefooted...( if not nude)

I observed this first hand as a child while seeing another girl of equal age kicking and screaming over her mommy's knee. When the spanked child would bend her knees, her pretty soles would come into view in what I considered an alluring fashion.

To the artist all anatomy is beautiful. Likewise to the spanker, the more flesh be exposed...the better.

I like seeing the soles of women's shoes, but not feet.