Arrested for wearing nothing but a diaper in public?

I called a few local police departments and told them i lost a bet on a football game a i had to wear nothing but a diaper in public, i could not get a straight answer. But concider this try it at a beach, i mean a diaper covers the same if not more than a speedo

You cant get arrested for wear nothing but a diaper

I don't think it is as simple as Yes or No. I do think it would depend on which city, if the cops who you encountered were in the mood to pursue it, what they charged you with, who else was around, etc... Certainly on a beach, a diaper offers as much coverage as a speedo, but did your presence provoke so much commotion a cop might feel you were the cause of a disturbance? This should not be the diaper-wearers problem, but you know how these things go...I would say let's keep trying, pushing the cause forward, but be reasonable. We don't wear underwear with no pants down mainstreet at midday. That being said, I love the feeling of just a diaper while outdoors....

Diapered Dean, You certainly aren't someone who just wishes and dreams about testing the limits. I would say, wow!

The police needs to leave people alone and watch for murderers, theives, and anyone who is harming someone. The police likes to harrass local civilians just because they can which is wrong. Diapers is another form of underwear. The people in today's society thinks if you're different than them like those who would rather wear diapers as their underwear for whatever the reason may be is bad and those people who complain over others around them will be done the same way. They'll reap what they so and that goes for the law officals too.

My intial thought if I saw someone wearing just a diaper in public would be "what a creep" or "what the hell are they doing" diapers are a form of underwear and as such they should be worn under pants or shorts henceforth the name underwear if I saw someone wearing just underwear in public I would have the same reaction. Their is nothing wrong with someone wearing a diaper as underwear either for conveince need or enjoyment but no one else wants to see a grown man or woman walking around in just a diaper or just their underwear

I'll give you a good one , Where i live to get beer is 8 or 10 miles to visit someone, pack a lunch . I left dlcripple's to head home about 50 miles away, around 30 miles out i needed to change and pulled of out into the desert . about half way undressed lights came on behind me and a cop was asking for id. .registration and insurance. I said guy i am changing my diaper do you want to help??

He didn't say a word , he left

Nothing wrong with doing that, what i am saying is if in a city someone makes a point to walk around in just a diaper then i think they could be arrested in a situation like that your not trying to be public about it so by being honest the cop will likely leave you alone i would think

Yes you can get arrested for that as it's consided a breach of comon decency or/ a act of indecent exposure, which is a minor crime, however if you with a carer then you won't get arrested because you could claim that your disabled in which case you probably will only get a written warning/caution.

My advice would be to avoid this situation please don't break the law and cover up your diapers under your clothing and please don't encourage people to do anything illegal because it's just not right.

Although to awnser your questions, I wouldn't feel comfortable going out in just a diaper and a t-shirt as I would be humilliated and embarrassed about the whole thing as I haven't done anything like that since I was a baby/toddler in arms more than 30 years ago.

Yours sincerely

Chinababy888

I might try it on a beach in a far away town, where I'm not known

by anyone around that area. And like some one below said, I 'd have a long t shirt

to cover my diaper with.

Your post doesn't say where. At least in Canada, you certainly wouldn't get arrested or harrassed. Funny looks perhaps, but hell I wear a tail buttplug in public.

Out of curiosity I looked up what the local Indecent Exposure laws were where I live.

(720 ILCS 5/11-30) (was 720 ILCS 5/11-9)

Sec. 11-30. Public indecency.

(a) Any person of the age of 17 years and upwards who performs any of the following acts in a public place commits a public indecency:

(1) An act of sexual penetration or sexual conduct; or

(2) A lewd exposure of the body done with intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desire of the person.

Breast-feeding of infants is not an act of public indecency.

(b) "Public place" for purposes of this Section means any place where the conduct may reasonably be expected to be viewed by others.

(c) Sentence.

Public indecency is a Class A misdemeanor. A person convicted of a third or subsequent violation for public indecency is guilty of a Class 4 felony. Public indecency is a Class 4 felony if committed by a person 18 years of age or older who is on or within 500 feet of elementary or secondary school grounds when children are present on the grounds.

(Source: P.A. 96-1098, eff. 1-1-11; 96-1551, eff. 7-1-11.)

So if the cop could see you had an erection, then you could be in trouble.

A diaper is not, and will not ever be classified indecent. A diaper is far less revealing then underwear. Thugs reveal their underwear with impunity. Millions of adults wear diapers 24/7. Even if it is obvious that an adult has a diaper under pants, shorts, or a diaper cover they (you) will be terribly embarrassed but you can not, will not be arrested.

The way I see it you have the diaper on against skin, under underwear. Would you go outdoors in public with only your underwear on? Then expect the police to turn a blind eye to it. I would never pull a stunt like this and being in a wheelchair I could be seen to be disabled. Then the big and important thing we do not need anyone going out drawing bad publicity to others like ourselves.

I would be extremely cautious about doing something like this. All it takes is for one person to get their panties in a bunch call the police and get you arrested. If you're going to do anything like this I would suggest doing something like that at a function something like a gay pride whatever. But just walking down the street wearing nothing but a T-shirt and an exposed diaper is a quick way of getting yourself arrested wrapped up in the legal system and possibly get labeled as a sexual deviant and getting the tag of sex offender. While someone said in another post that diapers would not be considered indecent yet they are thinking of a child in a diaper which is acceptable for a child to run around in nothing but a shirt and a diaper but this does not apply to an adult. So my suggestion on the subject is not to do it.

Come to Brazil during Carnival, and you can wear nothing but a diaper in public as a costume. Diapers are chosen as the cheapest costume for Carnival, and you can wear them while eating at any restaurant, going to the bakery, withdrawing money from an ATM, filling up your car at the gas station, or buying more diapers at the pharmacy. These are just examples. No one sees wearing a diaper as something strange during Carnival, and you have complete freedom to wear any costume you want anywhere.

Come to Brazil during Carnival, and you can wear nothing but a diaper in public as a costume. Diapers are chosen as the cheapest costume for Carnival, and you can wear them while eating at any restaurant, going to the bakery, withdrawing money from an ATM, filling up your car at the gas station, or buying more diapers at the pharmacy. These are just examples. No one sees wearing a diaper as something strange during Carnival, and you have complete freedom to wear any costume you want anywhere.

Just wondering, would you be allowed to sit in a restaurant in an obviously used diaper? I would think they would require some type of diaper cover for hygiene reasons. Or is everyone too drunk to notice!

If anyone is interested to go off on the tangent, "arrested for wearing only a jockstrap", here is a classic article with a key photo

https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/cambridges-jeffrey-shaver-on-trial-for-public-nudity/article_2837ebbf-c0b5-59e7-95c9-21dbf1eaea22.html

The Jockstrap in public article doesn't actually surprise me, as the man in question was exposing his behind. That is entirely different from a diaper - nothing that is considered offensive is exposed. I'm still not sure how most police would react to an adult walking around in a diaper, of someone was shocked enough to call the cops. Would they treat it as a public nuissance and haul that diapered bottom off to jail?

I think about that a lot when I go on one of my diaper walks on nice summer evenings.

It always comes down to ONE extremely simple principle: do NOT impose your fetish on other people. Why is this so hard for some people to understand? It's incredibly selfish to impose something – anything, really – on people who have neither asked nor consented to it.

Maybe my view on this will shock you, but to me, doing this is downright akin to sexual assault. At least, I put this in the same "DO NOT DO THIS UNLESS YOU'VE BEEN GIVEN PERMISSION" category.