I am uncut anyway I am fashinated by the high and tight circumcisions and in particular those executed by the resection sleeve technique with also frenectomy. The appearence is that of an always retracted penis.
My preference is Low & Tight, and that is how I was circumcised age 6, cut line is 3mm behind the glans, the remaining skin is not loose when flaccid, and stretches drum tight when erect.
The urologist who performed my operation removed the entire prepuce, including most of its inner layer, and the frenulum. This resulted in a very low and tight circumcision. The operation permanently revealed the entire glans, including its coronal sulcus. The entire glans remains fully exposed at all times, when my penis is flaccid and when it is fully erect. The circumcision scar is located less than 2mm below the corona.
Switchable said:The looking uncircumcised and retracted has nothing to do with the circumcision. It is generally a combination of short penis length and being overweight.Dam, now I must look for that camera you put in my bathroom. 😮
SwitchableSusie said:Everybody has an agenda on this topic.Have you seen the crap Pink got after posting the picture of her son on facebook? She decided to ink out his cut penis. I think it was totally unnecessary.Even though I retained my foreskin (mother's choice) I feel either way would be fine. If my wife had wanted me cut I would have done it for her but she never mentioned it. I tried holding it back during sex to see what it felt like and she definitely did not like the feeling of my glans and coronal ridge rubbing on her vaginal walls. Some girls must either like that or at least get used to it. I got tired of the sensitivity (pain) of my bare glans touching things other than my inner foreskin so I desensitized it years ago. I got used to that so I suppose a girl could do the same about her vaginal walls.I think I would be just as satisfied if my mother had gone the other way on it except that I do have a preference on the style. I would prefer having it tight so the coronal ridge is fully and permanently exposed and so I can feel it rubbing against her walls. I would like it high to retain as much of the inner foreskin for the pleasure it provides.
I think that high and tight with a definite scar looks awesome.Myself I am moderate looseness with some skin bunching against the carona and moderate height. But as I was cut at birth I just got what I got
Gods forbid, If I had to get circumcised, I'd probably opt for a low cut. Not at all a fan of the two tone look; it'd be very apparent with my skin color.
The doctor that circumcised me at birth decided to give me a forceps guided high and tight with the scar positioned half way along the shaft. I'm happy with it.
My preference has always been for an invisible circumcision. That is the ideal and I have only ever seen a rare few. Invisible means no fenulum, no foreskin, no detectable scar, no change in skin color; just a penis that looks like it naturally formed without any of that. When I was circumcised the internet was still mostly just a bunch of modems between university and military computers, so I didn't have access to the ocean of information we do today and I just didn't know that there were different styles, but I hoped mine would turn out low and tight to make the scar as invisible as possible. When I got the bandages off and the swelling went down I discovered I had been cut high and very tight. I wasn't exactly disappointed, but I was worried I'd have an artificial look and a tiny bit worried and how shortened it looked because of it, but my surgeon told me the skin would stretch out over time, so I wasn't too upset about it. Eventually the contrast between the inside and outside skin reduced and the scar while it is still visible isn't very noticeable, so that's great. Additionally, I was fortunate that the inner skin didn't get puffy, which apparently often happens to high adult cuts, and as the skin slowly stretched out over the next year the scar reduced from a noticeable bump with stitch marks to a very smooth transition. Perhaps still being a teenager helped with that excellent healing.Having said all of that, I don't mind the aesthetics of a visible scar - I have seen one or two that were *CHEF'S KISS*, just not what I wanted for myself.
I wrote a few posts up (and a few years ago) that if I had to get circumcised, I would want a low cut such that it looked like I was born naturally circumcised - just like the post immediately above this. Weird thing is, exploring this kink, I'm not so sure about that any more. I think that's because if I pull my foreskin right back, there is a two-tone look going on, although the transition between colors is, of course, gradual. It's less apparent when flaccid, though - which seems to be the case on cut guys as well, anyways.So, I guess I don't really care about that much any more. The cut I'd opt for would be one that preserves the most sensation while looking pleasing. So, no "Tuli" style dorsal slits that leave the foreskin hanging. Keep the frenulum intact if possible. I guess that means a high and loose, if my reading is correct? Enough cut to keep the glans fully exposed no matter what, but making sure there's enough slack skin.
Uncut myself but I think if I were to have it done, I would want a tight one for neatness. Low looks neater but I suspect a high cut would give more sensitivity? I believe there is a 'cosmetic' option now where a band of skin is removed from the base of the penis where it joins the body, the foreskin is then fully retracted and the skin is stitched together. Probably looks neat?
Whilst I admit I find the look of a High & Tight appealing, Low & Tight where all the foreskin is removed is my preference and I what I have
That’s actually a difficult one. For sure tight is always better, as an uncircwd male I would say the tighter the better. And then I have to agree with @CanD that the aesthetics of an invisible, ultra low tight circ with no frenulum is super hot. Like the male was born without any foreskin at all. But the look of a high and tight with a visible scar or discoloration is also appealing as it displays the modification of the penis, wether it was voluntary or mandated by parents or medical personnel or e.g. a military draft requirement.