Female Ejaculation

An interesting URL -- http://www.the-clitoris.com/f_html/female_ejaculation.htm

The home URL is -- http://www.the-clitoris.com/

Well worth a visit!

Some my also find this site interesting -- Female orgasm Masturbation videos

http://www.femalecoming.com/

Very nice sites. The clitoris site is one every women should visit that is curious about her body in comparison to others.

For those who may be interested, I've posted an article on Female Ejaculation, http://sites.google.com/site/xamminer2/female-ejaculation .

Andy,

aka xamminer

Superlative, Andy, thank you!

LadyDoc

You're certainly welcome!

Mashie, why are you so sure of it?

Effectively are been collected there fluid different from urine and is not scifi that residual of female organ are present in male and viceversa.

Residual of penis = clitoris, residual of prostate = some tissue around the urethra and in the male nipple not working but present ...

These "residual" are more or less developed in relation of amount of male hormone in a woman or female one in the man, until to become patologic ( for example a clitoris so big to be similar to a little penis ).

This way, it's an interesting argument and not so easy like your comment 😉

M2000

I agree with Mashie 100%.

There is no anatomic structure capable of storing or producing that volume of fluid anywhere in the female pelvis. If there was, gynecologists, surgeons, obstetricians, pathologists and anatomists would have found it LONG LONG ago. REALLY, I mean MILLIONS of live women and their corpses have been examined since Leonardo DaVinci and others before him have been studying anatomy.

There may be the expression of several milliliters of fluid, but not what's in all those porno pix.

If we are speaking of large quantity, I agree too, the porno pix are surely fake or better simply urine 😃

But I am convinced that something of true can be really in some women, obviously only some drops or so ...

M2000

I absolutely love female genital lubrication there's nothing nicer and it hits the spot for me big time.

But I'm with Mashie and Switchable...Female ejaculation is a lovely thought but in reality just a urban myth. Women get wet sometimes very, but they can't ejaculate.

The porn flics are like some when the guy ejaculates all over the woman and there's enough semen to float a battleship!....fake!

Dr Philip - The UK Play Doctor.

While one might quibble with the picture I used or be skeptical about the volume of ejaculate that I cited (15 to 125 ml PER MINUTE), it's pretty hard to argue with peer reviewed medical research without some empirical evidence to the contrary:

J Sex Med. 2007 Sep;4(5):1388-93; discussion 1393. Epub 2007 Jul 18. The Female Prostate Revisited: Perineal Ultrasound and Biochemical Dtudies of Female Ejaculate. Wimpissinger F, Stifter K, Grin W, Stackl W. Department of Urology, Rudolfstiftung Hospital-Urology, Vienna, Austria. florian.wimpissinger@gmx.at

INTRODUCTION: Many speculations have been made on the possible existence of a "female prostate gland" and "female ejaculation." Despite several reports on the subject, controversy still exists around the "female prostate" and whether such a gland might be the source of fluid emitted during orgasm (ejaculation). AIM: To investigate the ultrasonographic, biochemical, and endoscopic features in two women who reported actual ejaculations during orgasm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perineal ultrasound studies, as well as biochemical characteristics of ejaculate and urethroscopy, have been performed in two women. METHODS: Two premenopausal women--44 and 45 years of age--who actually reported fluid expulsion (ejaculation) during orgasm have been investigated. Ultrasound imaging, biochemical studies of the ejaculated fluid, and endoscopy of the urethra have been used to identify a prostate in the female. Ejaculated fluid parameters have been compared to voided urine samples. RESULTS: On high-definition perineal ultrasound images, a structure was identified consistent with the gland tissue surrounding the entire length of the female urethra. On urethroscopy, one midline opening (duct) was seen just inside the external meatus in the six-o'clock position. Biochemically, the fluid emitted during orgasm showed all the parameters found in prostate plasma in contrast to the values measured in voided urine. CONCLUSIONS: Data of the two women presented further underline the concept of the female prostate both as an organ itself and as the source of female ejaculation.

The Journal of Sexual Medicine is the Journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine ( http://www.issm.info ) and this is just one of several peer reviewed articles cited.

Incidentally, no argument from me that a lot of the porno depictions of female ejaculation are faked. No surprise there. When we hear porno actors screaming Ohhhhhh, baby, yeah!!!, we're under no illusion that anyone depicted is in love or actually having an orgasm.

Mashie and I are not debating whether or not several milliliters of fluid can be expressed from [someplace] in the female reproductive system during orgasm. What we are refuting is the volume. The prostate (the REAL prostate) in the male produces a few milliliters for the first orgasm, and less in succeeding ones, while the female "squirting" has been described as up to hundreds of milliliters. This is simply ridiculous. As I stated above, if there was such a structure capable of producing and/or storing that volume of fluid, its presence wouldn't be a secret, everybody would know about it and way more lay people would have been able to have seen it without lying about it.

Switchablesusie and Mashie:

I'm unclear where you saw a claim of hundreds of milliliters. In my article I mention 15 ml (about a tablespoon) to 125 ml (less than half a cup). This range is based on figures given in a 2002 paper published by Shannon Bell, Ph.d., York University and refers not to the amount produced by one ejaculation but, rather the amount that could be produced over a one minute period. Zaviacic[sup]1[/sup], cited in my bibliography, estimates mean volume at about 5 ml, although much higher volumes have been reported in other studies. In my personal experience I think a range of 5 - 20 ml is about right; so, I don't think there is too much of a difference of opinion between the two of you and me.

As far as "the REAL prostate" is concerned, in 2001 the FICAT (Federative International Committee on Anatomical Terminology) announced support for the term "Female Prostate" in their Journal, Histology Terminology. Additionally, according to Dorland's Medical Dictionary http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_hl_dorlands_split.jsp?pg=/ppdocs/us/common/dorlands/dorland/nine/20823231.htm , the peri-urethral gland is considered analogous to the prostate in men. There is nothing disingenuous about calling the peri-urethral gland in women the female prostate.

Various studies show that anywhere from 10–69% of women report being able to ejaculate, although definitions and methods vary among these studies.[sup]1,2,3,4,5[/sup]

As I stated in my article, the subject of Female Ejaculation is controversial. I don't mean to create any rancor, particularly in as much as we don't really seem to disagree by much.

[sup]1[/sup] Zaviacic M. The human female prostate: From Vestigial Skene's Paraurethral Glands and Ducts to Woman's Functional Prostate. Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1999

[sup]2[/sup] Bullough B, David M, Whipple B, Dixon J, Allgeier ER, Drury KC. (March 1984). "Subjective reports of female orgasmic expulsion of fluid". Nurse Pract 9 (3): 55–9. doi:10.1097/00006205-198409030-00009. PMID 6546788.

[sup]3[/sup] Davidson JK, Darling CA, Conway-Welch, C (Summer 1989). "The role of the Grafenberg Spot and female gushing in the female orgasmic response: an empirical analysis". J Sex Marital Ther 15 (2): 102–20. PMID 2769772.

[sup]4[/sup] Darling CA, Davidson JK Sr, Conway-Welch C. (February 1990). "Female ejaculation: perceived origins, the Grafenberg spot/area, and sexual responsiveness". Arch Sex Behav 19 (1): 29–47. doi:10.1007/BF01541824. PMID 2327894.

[sup]5[/sup] Wimpissinger F, Stifter K, Grin W, Stackl W (September 2007). "The female prostate revisited: perineal ultrasound and biochemical studies of female ejaculate". J Sex Med 4 (5): 1388–93; discussion 1393. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00542.x. PMID 17634056.

Whoops, one more thought, Mashie and Switchablesusie:

In taking your point into consideration, I'm changing the picture in my article to show a bit more modest "squirt" and revising my volume figures downward to reflect something closer to Zaviacic's 5 ml mean ejaculation.

Thanks for keeping me honest.

Andy

[quote author=Mash4077th link=topic=31110.msg290225#msg290225 date=1272439739]

. . . . .And on another point, one of the biggest reasons I have issues with this whole squirting thing, besides that fact that usually it's fake, is that men seem to brag about being able to make a woman squirt. Really? Chances are, if the woman would have urinated before they had sex that wouldn't have happened. For some it seems that it's a thing of grandeur, a trophy for lack of better terms. Like they are extra good in bed because they can make a woman "squirt", or that their dick is somehow a magic wand or something, lol. Again, ummm, I don't think so.

My advice to these people is if you want a golden shower, then ask her to pee on you. It's a lot less work on your part, and chances are you will be in a place that's easier to clean up.

[/quote]

I couldn't agree more, especially about it being the man's ability. Ditto for the golden shower. A golden shower IN the shower or at least if prepared for over a plastic drop cloth makes it easier to clean up.

N.B.: I'm not really into golden showers except maybe occasionally IN the shower.

[quote author=Mash4077th link=topic=31110.msg290225#msg290225 date=1272439739]

But you have to admit that 99 percent of the time when you see material whether it's written or visual they talk about women who produce great amounts of "unknown" fluid and thus call it squirting.[/quote]

I couldn't agree more. This is one reason that I'm not very interested in conventional porn. A lot of it is bull. And the braggadocio about "making" women squirt that we see on the Internet is an embarrassment to the male gender and reminds me a bit of husbands who are taught to "coach" at a birth. You only have to be involved in one birth to see that a man's primary role in the birthing process is, at best, performing the function of "bystander", lol.

I think that you and Susie have put your fingers on two of the main reasons that female ejaculation is controversial among feminists:

[list type=decimal]

Unreasonable performance pressure . . .,

Brought on by unreasonable and ill informed expectations,

[/list]

I certainly didn't mean to infer that men had any role in eliciting a female ejaculation beyond well informed encouragement or that, for that matter, a man needed to be involved at all.

Andy

I cant help but squirt my cum .

when im forced to cum its a squirt but if i masturbate my self i squirt but its more of a trickle .and i also can produce a very thick white cum from my vagina when im having sex .and i can not squirtduring sex but i do cum.

but your find there are 2 different types of a woman cumming.

some can not cum squirting .

All I know about this is, that once I had a girlfriend who had some kind of a female ejaculation. I had to lick her quite long for it, but than it worked... She told me, that she was embarassed about it and so she normaly tries to hold it back. I was quite surprised, I have to admit :-)