Physical Exam by a DO vs. MD

I know every doctor has their own approach and routine with how they conduct physicals, but I'm wondering if there are any general differences you could expect if you were examined by a DO versus an MD for a comprehensive physical exam? Anyone have actual experiences that compares the two?

Over the last 10 years I’ve seen various DO and PA provides for my primary care. Just recently switched to an MD. I’ve noticed no difference in physicals, they have all been bare bones.

Primary care should be the first line of defense. They should see your skin to notice weird moles and other issues and then can refer you. They should check for hernia, abdominal issues, testicular cancer, throat issues, and more. To me there is no point even other than checking a box to reduce my insurance premium.

Generally I like DOs better. They seem to be less egotistical and also more open to natural healing.

None of the doctors changed the routine of doing clinical physical exams and even with specialists such as urologists and cardiologists. Always evaluating heart rate, blood pressure, hernia and others.

I’ve been examined by both. No difference for me.

I have had both MD and DO and not noticed any difference.

I've been to MD, DO, NP, & PA, I've not noticed any differences in my exams or care.

Only DO I saw was in my 30’s early 40’s. He was a fitness buff and checked my flexibility, touching my toes etc. that’s the only difference I saw between him and other MDs I’ve seen.