Money, Masters and Salves

It seems to me that to be a good Master you should be rich. Also, if you are doing okay (or better) financially you would not want to be a slave.

Is my reasoning valid?

I don’t think it’s a matter of status, financially or otherwise. Some very well off people desire to be submissive outside of their work or satus. For some, it may be a psychological release from the stress of always being in control. Like wise people with limited means can be very dominant.

I don’t think it’s a matter of status, financially or otherwise. Some very well off people desire to be submissive outside of their work or satus. For some, it may be a psychological release from the stress of always being in control. Like wise people with limited means can be very dominant.

I agree @Rigel. I think that there are some notable examples of rich doms and less wealthy subs, especially in non-fiction media such as erotica and movies. But there are plenty of well-off submissives who crave to let their guard down and be controlled.

There’s currently a joke circulating on TikTok of the leader of the opposition in Australian politics being referred to as “Peggy Sue” because people think that a sex worker talking about a client she calls Peggy Sue (who just wants to be pegged by something bigger and bigger every time) is him.

A psychologists response video said “well, maybe” and pointed out the same as yourself that a proportion of powerful/ important people “let their hair down” as a treat.

Mason Verger was a classic example of a fictional extremely wealthy man into submissive role play. Although fictional, I bet the character was based on real life wealthy persons with submissive kinks.

I’ve known a few people on here who are very well off and enjoy the submissive role, or are switches in real life.