Difference between erect circumcised and uncircumcised

A lady friend of mine claimed to me that once erect there is no difference between a circumcised and an uncircumcised penis. From what I see though an uncut penis will either have the foreskin still partially over the glans or folded bunched behind it. What is the truth?

What is the difference for the partner? (Another lady friend of mine said that she found friction from circumcised males more intense and even unpleasant in the vagina.)

I heard the same opinion from a woman. Perhaps they are right...

I kind of figured that an circumcised one would feel an bit more abrasive than an uncut one

Can't speak for other guys but I'm uncut and once erect the skin of my penis is tight and my entire glans exposed.

I’m not circumcised and when I’m erect my glans is still almost completely or even completely covered. I can though imagine that a woman doesn’t feel a difference when being penetrated. Fact is when I go in, my foreskin is pushed back completely anyway. If not before, because she plays with me, then during going inside her.

I know my partner does like to play with my foreskin and that will certainly be a difference 🙂

Depends how long the foreskin is I think. Mine stays mostly covered unless I ( or someone else ) pull(s) it back.

I can confirm as a circumcised man that when erect the gland is completely exposed as it is when flaccid.

When I had a foreskin if I was lying on my back with an erection you could not really tell I wasn't circumcised. Standing it usually needed help to fully retract.

The difference between an erect uncircumcised penis with the foreskin retracted and a circumcised penis is that the coronal sulcus is fully exposed in the circumcised man. This allows the partner to feel the rim of the head during penetrative intercourse.

To the OP, it seems to me that your friend is under the common assumption that the foreskin pulls back to expose the glans on an erect, uncircumcised penis. It isn't necessarily true, but for those where the skin automatically retracts, an untrained or non-discerning eye may not be able to tell whether a guy is cut or uncut.

My foreskin is long enough to cover most of the head when hard, until I pull it back. If I do that, some women have assumed I am circumcised. For those women, they associate being able to see the glans as circumcised and don't give much thought as to what skin might be going on behind the head, on the shaft.

I have a "hybrid" foreskin. At the most, whether erect or not erect, my foreskin will only cover 1/2 the head, no matter how hard I try. When I release it, it retracts to behind the head and stays there 100% of the time. It looks like a circumcized foreskin with a few wrinkles. I can't find any suture line to show that it was ever done.

I have never had any lady friends comment on it either way.

I wouldn't have it any other way as there is lots of skin movement for masturbation purposes.

Well soft they do look different. Erect uncircumcised guys can have the glans exposed or covered. However if there is a visible scar line you would know the guy is circumcised.

Uncircumcised might have more skin movement when inside. Circumcised just tight friction