Does a thought of male gynecologist getting hidden erection while examining you bother women here?

Does a thought of a male gynecologist getting a hidden erection while he examines you ever bother any women here ?

I mean getting aroused by a man in presence of a naked woman shouldn't shock anyone, even if he controls it and doesn't let it interfere with the exam is not the point here, yes we all know they are professionals and are trained in medical ethics and he's seen so many over years it doesn't faze him any more and on and on , but its a fact that - men do get aroused and we cant control the erections , they come So I was just wondering if any women thought of that and if that bothers you in any way that a doc you go to and get undressed in front of fully may get an erection as he is examining you ? thank you

It’s surprising how not a single female had anyhing to reply to this post , the assumption would be that women don’t really care if he gets an erection as long as he is a good doctor 🤷‍♂️

I suspect most women would take it as a compliment. If a doctor who sees plenty of naked women is aroused it does make them special.

For an exam in real life, I would prefer not to think about it.

For a play exam, though…?

That would be really gross and I would never go to him again.

It never once came to my mind that a doctor doing his job by examining women would be aroused. I would think that there are too many other things he has to think of and care about.

In a play that would be totally different of course 😉

@CooolDave Do you think that male gynaecologist get erections when examining women patients. So just the sight of a naked woman would cause any male to get an erection regardless of the situation . I think its important to differentiate between nudity, sexuality and sexual arousal. Nudity as in naturalism equates to zero sexuality you don't see naturalist walking around in a constant state of arousal.

From your statement “but its a fact that - men do get aroused and we cant control the erections ” I think you equate nudity with sexuality and sexual arousement. In a clinical setting nudity and sexuality don't coexist in my experience , a clinician's main focus is on ensuring that all possibilities for your symptoms are check and nothing is missed. The focus is finding the cause and how to fix it , not whether you are naked.

You really need to reflect and see if you are jealous or have insecurities ( as in possessiveness) and you are trying to find any excuse to prevent your wife from seeing a male doctor or gynaecologist because you don't want what you consider yours to be viewed or touch by others.

If I were seeing a doctor that was becoming erect when he examined me I’d find a new doctor.

I have never been to a male doctor and the thought would gross me out.

@RN1993,

AMEN! Nailed it!

I don't plan on looking at that area of my doctor. Lol I barely make eye contact with him. The only way I would notice it is if he does something inappropriate with it. So far, all the male doctors/gynecologists I have seen are overly professional.

It would be unprofessional of him to have the erection.

Sorry to said, but lot of males mistaken though ehkm.. naughty videos with reality. In real life, they have hard work. Seen many troubles cases. Like on mine hospital. 90% of cases are older womens with dropped out uterus. Even they have young girls (let's say under 25yo) and they have bad cases of infections or rarely- cancers in breasts or down parts. So they was focused on health check ups than on imagining what they would like to do with this girl

It would be unprofessional of him to have the erection.

@MissStress I would posit to say if he acts upon having one, or draws attention to it in any way, the line has been crossed. However, he or may not have control over whether it occurs. Just thoughts, but I do not speak for male healthcare providers….

I'm not a gynecologist but an internist who did hundreds of pelvics on women who preferred that as part of their routine annual physical. I gotta tell you…getting aroused as a result of doing a clinical, real life exam is the furthest thing from reality that I can imagine.

I was just recollecting the stream of consciousness in my mind as I was doing a clinical pelvic exam: “vaginal mucosa looks normal…need to improve the lighting a bit …no lesions on the cervix…oops, hope I didn't pinch her.” It seems clear how “Wow, great pussy!” simply DOES NOT FIT in there!

I'm not a gynecologist but an internist who did hundreds of pelvics on women who preferred that as part of their routine annual physical. I gotta tell you…getting aroused as a result of doing a clinical, real life exam is the furthest thing from reality that I can imagine.

@Pollux My question to your comment would be first why you in this medFetush site and going back to your post in another thread you wrote

Pollux

623 / 99

“Not sure which category this might be but I'm completely fascinated by all things related to bottoms and have been since the age of 7 when I recall becoming fascinated by them. To the best of my knowledge, I just came hardwired this way. When I reached puberty my fascination became sexual. Been pretty much the same ever since. Rectal Temperatures, spanking, enemas…you name it! There it is”

So I don’t know how you can reply to not being aroused doing pelvic exams ??

Good question, CooolDave, and it's reasonable to ask. I would simply answer that my head is in a totally different place when I was acting as a medical professional versus a turned on play doc. My focus is just on different things. As a professional I do not allow my mind to go to the same places. In fact, I guess after years of practice it doesn't even seem to want to go to the kinky places it otherwise does. As I was trying to point out in my little"internal thoughts" thing, in a clinical situation there is just so much else to think about. I know this is a topic that's been debated for years on Zity – whether this bifurcation of thoughts is really possible. All I can say is…it is.

Good question, CooolDave, and it's reasonable to ask. I would simply answer that my head is in a totally different place when I was acting as a medical professional versus a turned on play doc. My focus is just on different things. As a professional I do not allow my mind to go to the same places. In fact, I guess after years of practice it doesn't even seem to want to go to the kinky places it otherwise does. As I was trying to point out in my little"internal thoughts" thing, in a clinical situation there is just so much else to think about. I know this is a topic that's been debated for years on Zity – whether this bifurcation of thoughts is really possible. All I can say is…it is.

And that was my point that as a male examining a female you have to fight those thoughts but those thoughts and arousal is there , and as a professional obviously going through med school and becoming a doctor you really want to treat patients not look at their vaginas, there's other easier and cheaper ways of doing that , there's no magic wand that is tapped on doctors noses to all of a sudden be immune to a female body , and when faced with the situation where doc is examining a female he has to act as if he is professional and kill those thoughts but they are there

@CooolDave You've obviously never worked in a restaurant.

And female Gyn's have chaperons in office too.

@CooolDave You've obviously never worked in a restaurant.

And female Gyn's have chaperons in office too.

@Nurse_Phillips Through out this lengthy conversation that's what you took out - What's your point ?

@Nurse_Phillips Through out this lengthy conversation that's what you took out - What's your point ?

Really? You said:

, just it's hard to believe that someone with food desires can look at a hamburger and see a carrot and not have any thought of wanting to eat the burger, you can say I can't have this burger cause I am on a diet but to completely be blinded to it and it not having any effect on your stomach is a very rare occurrence , that's why it's mandatory to have a nurse present with a male Gyn and not with a female Gyn

You made an analogy of not being able to look at food and not feeling the desire to eat it. My point is that if you've ever worked food service you see, handle and create meals all day long but don't want to eat them. You're focused on doing your job, not looking at these meals as ‘wow I want to eat that’. It never even crosses your mind.

And your comment back to me was quite rude.

@CooolDave

@CooolDave

• female gyns have to have chaperones too
• you sound like a pervert

@SarahBlues I love it when people have nothing constructive to say they exert to insults - Trust me I am not a pervert any more than you or anyone else on this site . I am just having a conversation, if you can keep up with it and offer an intelligent input then just do it, insulting me is easy …

Having a nurse in the room during a gynecological exam is not a Legal Requirement specifically for male gynecologists or female gynecologists.

However, it is a common practice that is recommended by medical associations and healthcare providers to ensure the safety and comfort of patients during such exams.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that healthcare providers offer chaperones to patients during sensitive exams, including gynecological exams, regardless of the gender of the provider. The chaperone can be a nurse or another healthcare professional who is present in the room to provide support and ensure that the exam is conducted appropriately and professionally.

While having a chaperone in the room is not Legally Required, it is considered a best practice and can help patients feel more comfortable and secure during a vulnerable and intimate exam.

Male doctors are just more prone to abuse vs female doctors, therefore a female doctor can get away with not having a nurse present but a male doctor would most likely not dare to perform an exam without a nurse present.

Kind of different, but kind of the same, at least in my odd reasoning. lol I once had a friend who did piercings. Once, during a chat, the guys asked him if he liked the 'benefit' of his job to be able to look at breasts and vaginas as he was piercing them. His response? A groan and complaint about how he was sick of looking at them! I suspect that a lot of the times it just becomes commonplace and nothing 'new'. It would just be the last thing on his mind. He would then go on to enlighten us about his sex life with his girlfriend. So, really, just a matter of being able to 'turn it off and on again' or more switch to being professional while working and then back to your personal self.

Personally, I hope my doctor is focused on my care, rather than sexual things. But, body responses happen and well, if it happens, it happens.

I’ve been to a few gyn exams with my wife. One, the doc explained what he was doing and looking for. I had a ring side seat. While my wife really turns me on (still does!) - I found nothing arousing about the exam - it was very interesting and informative. Nor did the doc. He was matter of of fact and professional. There’s more to arousal than looking at a vagina clinically, for most of us.

While there are a few perv docs who get off on that, I suspect that type incapable of an erection.

I'll leave you with this and be aware that's all my point was

http://patientmodesty.org/index.aspx

http://patientmodesty.org/avoidmaledocs.aspx

http://sexualmisconductbydoctors.com/chaperones.aspx

Yes it does because I think it should not happen in a “profession”

I never thought a medical professional would get an erection whilst doing an exam.

Just like, I love to see and touch a penis, I can honestly say I have never become aroused/ wet whilst giving a gentleman a bed bath or shower as part of my career as a carer.

This thread needs critical thinking skills.

• the original question was whether male gynos popping a woody would bother females. Well, this is a case by case answer. All females aren't going to be bothered, and all females aren't going to be unphased, either. And some females are going to lie somewhere in between where in one situation with one particular gynecologist, it may not bother them and in others it would. It would seem, though, from the range of responses thus far, it would upset most females here. That seems reasonable.
• the topic, however, seems to have morphed into whether healthcare professionals do or do not sexualize patient encounters. Zity does tend to have a hard on for its healthcare providers and would like to think they're all paragons of virtue, but a simple google search would quickly bust this notion. nurses have murdered patients, doctors have recorded patients' intimate exams, made disparaging comments about patients while they were under anesthesia, routinely perform pelvic exams without patients' consent while under anesthesia, and of course you have Larry Nassar, and that's just off the top of my head. It is still reasonable to say most of the time everything is on the up and up, though, but to claim it just doesn't happen or every single doctor or nurse is capable of separating work from play is flat-out dishonest and demonstrably false.
• you can't really argue someone's own personal experience… because it is their experience. so if a professional on this forum speaks about their experience, well, you have to take it at face value because there is no disproving it, and I do believe most people here are being honest about their experience and feelings on the matter.
• even though you can't argue a person's personal experience, and most people are honest, it is still a good idea to retain a degree of skepticism regarding what people post or knowing who they really are. for example, if i see someone weigh in on this thread and go on about sexuality and professionalism but you look through their post history and there's no fetish content at all and we're on a fetish forum… well why?? there's always a why.

Also, on a side note about restaurants and eating… once I sliced over 100lbs of brisket in a day. I didn't want to look at a brisket for quite a while after that. But if a man likes brisket, he's eventually going to find his appetite for it again.