Detail, detail!

Let me get this off my chest! In communications with Zity-ers, including roleplaying by correspondence but also more general stuff exchanging information about each other and our kinks, I'm very often disappointed by the other person's seeming reluctance or inability to go into detail! For me, the more detail the better - the more realism, the more involvement! Granted, my own kinks are relatively rare which maybe freezes or intimidates some people. (Those kinks include interest in surgical and dental operations/procedures and anaesthesia; also mouths and teeth; also thorough medical exams of young patients such as my alter ego, ‘young Ken’.)

But invariably, in detail!

- Ken

Let me get this off my chest! In communications with Zity-ers, including roleplaying by correspondence but also more general stuff exchanging information about about each other and our kinks, I'm very often disappointed by the other person's seeming reluctance or inability to go into detail! For me, the more detail the better - the more realism, the more involvement! Granted, my own kinks are relatively rare which maybe freezes or intimidates some people. (Those kinks include interest in surgical and dental operations/procedures and anaesthesia; also mouths (wide open!); also thorough medical exams of young patients such as my alter ego, ‘young Ken’.)

But invariably, in detail!

- Ken

Ain't no use complainin' that's the way it's stayin' baby. People will post what they want to post and in the writing style they wish to execute. It is what it is.

My further grievance of course is with Zity-ers who do the smart (?) thing and criticise other Zity-ers for speaking their mind honestly and with a real point to make. My point last time about how detail can help make an account more ‘real’ and more ‘involving’ for the reader is something known to professional writers (myself among them). Further, provided the point being made isn't offensive to morals or to reasonably healthy sensibilities, then I believe I, for one, have the democratic right to make it. My point was well-intentioned, and I stand by it. 😃

- Ken

My further grievance of course is with Zity-ers who do the smart (?) thing and criticise other Zity-ers for speaking their mind honestly and with a real point to make. My point last time about how detail can help make an account more ‘real’ and more ‘involving’ for the reader is something known to professional writers (myself among them). Further, provided the point being made isn't offensive to morals or to reasonably healthy sensibilities, then I believe I, for one, have the democratic right to make it. My point was well-intentioned, and I stand by it. 😃

- Ken

So it is perfectly acceptable for you to be critical of others but when the shoe is on the other foot it is a different story, Democracy? I think not.

Re post #4. Huh?! My original post was not being critical except in the sense that literary critics (and scholars) analyse a text. As l said, it was well-intentioned, and to the point.

- Ken

I call it like I see it.