Dd/bg Relationship that does NOT include age play: a question

I spent a year in the BDSM world a few years ago, and for a time was a collared sub in what was told to me to be a Dd/bg relationship. But I'm not sure if that is really the best descriptor of what I experienced. I know that a lot of Dd/bg relationships involve age play; however, mine did not. I do not identify as a little, but more as a sub or bottom.

How would you describe someone who was a baby girl in this context, but excluding it from age play?

If you are being anything other than your real age, especially a little girl, then it IS age play.

If you are being anything other than your real age, especially a little girl, then it IS age play.

I'm not pretending to be a different age. I'm not a little. I'm trying to figure out how to classify this kind of relationship. Maybe sensual BDSM or caring Dom, I dont know. But ageplay was NOT part of the mix.

From what you have said, it sounds like D/s,but with a gentle, firm Dom.

Maybe not the answer you are looking for, but I would not worry too much about labels. What is more important is how you both set up your relationship that worked for you. I am also going to throw this into the mix, relationships tend to be dynamic in nature, not static. It comes down to did it work for you no matter the label, and did things shift around in the roles to varying degrees.