Reading all the many accounts of members being spanked and getting erections, I can't help but being both amazed, flabbergasted and also incredulous that the parents/persons doing the spanking never seemed to wonder about the oh so very obvious connotations they themselves observed.
What could be more clear: spank, especially bare-bottomed or naked and almost invariably this produces an erection. Not a difficult observation to make.
And since most of these adult spankers are described as being strict, straight-laced, often religious and what not in that vein, how did they handle the dissonance that they observed? How could they not see that they were sowing the seeds that would very well link spanking and sex for the person spanked?
And I find it just as remarkable how the spanking is thought to have been administered with good intentions, while clearly producing a sexual response.
Presently, if there is any kind of nudity involved from a doctor, the insinuations and accusations of misconduct and abuse are guaranteed to follow. But a parental naked spanking? Then we get the fairy-tale story of loving parents …
There doesn't seem to be any consistency in thinking.