Docshelper010 To be more specific about the recent history of Electronic Medical Records, the origins were during the Bush II administration. He even talked about it in the State of the Union address, LONG before Obama. That's when federal funding began, too.
Why does that matter? Because the issues are well over a decade old and most practices are now on their second, third or even fourth EMR (Electronic Magic Record in my terminology). I work in health care (perhaps you, too) and that part of the industry is one of my consulting specialties.
The lack of consistency between products, the lack of the ability of doctors to "lock" confidential parts of a record, the poor security protections (hackers, etc.) and lots of other flaws is why the earlier posts are wise advice.
Enemasubgirl's explanation is a good example of an excellent way to handle those delicate needs.
An experience I had with an OB/Gyn practice in New England a few years ago was handled in another way. The lead physician (a woman) had a few women who were in complex relationships. One was being abused by her spouse and it is a very small town; another was active in BD/sm and some of her play led to medical issues. The practice's EMR was simply noted as: "See private notes held by Dr. XX," as she kept those paper records in her locked, private file drawer. Not a flawless approach, but an OK one. Some doctors even keep such records in private files at home.
If your kinks create the need for medical care that may require ongoing management, be very thoughtful about how the records are created, stored and accessed. As for me, I have my own copies of ALL of my medical records and although none involve any kink-related care, I would password those documents if that ever happens.